Abstract 4357313: Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) has been proposed as a therapeutic strategy for improving cardiac repair after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A previous meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the efficacy and safety of G-CSF but showed no statistically significant improvement. Recently, new studies provided an opportunity to update the current knowledge. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for RCTs comparing G-CSF to placebo or standard of care in AMI patients. The outcomes of interest were Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume (LVEDV), Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and mortality. Eleven RCTs involving 1,073 patients were included. Results: G-CSF significantly reduced LVEDV in the echocardiography subgroup (MD: -4.39 mL; 95% CI -6.80, -1.98; p < 0.001), while no effect was observed in the MRI subgroup (MD: -0.19 mL; 95% CI -7.22, 6.84; p = 0.958). Similarly, LVEF improved significantly in the echocardiography subgroup (MD: 6.76%; 95% CI 1.62, 11.90; p = 0.010) but not in the MRI subgroup (MD: -0.08%; 95% CI -2.38, 2.22; p = 0.947). No impact was observed on mortality (RR:1.00, 95% CI 0.45, 2.23, p = 0.995). Conclusion: G-CSF was associated with a reduction in LVEDV and improvement in LVEF in echocardiography studies, suggesting potential structural benefits. However, clinical outcomes remained unchanged. Larger, high-quality trials are needed to better understand the therapeutic role of G-CSF in AMI patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4357313
Primary Topic
Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4357313: Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adolfo Souza, Rafael Fonseca, Matheus de Jesus Leone Pereira, Kalynne Kellem Barros dos Santos et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
article

Abstract 4357313: Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adolfo Souza, Rafael Fonseca, Matheus de Jesus Leone Pereira, Kalynne Kellem Barros dos Santos, Mariana C. Oliveira, Fernanda Almeida Andrade, Lucca Tamara Alves Carretta, Luciano Falcão, Luiz Guilherme Silva Almeida, R Motta, Yasmin Silva, Gustavo Surgik
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) has been proposed as a therapeutic strategy for improving cardiac repair after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A previous meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the efficacy and safety of G-CSF but showed no statistically significant improvement. Recently, new studies provided an opportunity to update the current knowledge. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for RCTs comparing G-CSF to placebo or standard of care in AMI patients. The outcomes of interest were Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume (LVEDV), Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and mortality. Eleven RCTs involving 1,073 patients were included. Results: G-CSF significantly reduced LVEDV in the echocardiography subgroup (MD: -4.39 mL; 95% CI -6.80, -1.98; p < 0.001), while no effect was observed in the MRI subgroup (MD: -0.19 mL; 95% CI -7.22, 6.84; p = 0.958). Similarly, LVEF improved significantly in the echocardiography subgroup (MD: 6.76%; 95% CI 1.62, 11.90; p = 0.010) but not in the MRI subgroup (MD: -0.08%; 95% CI -2.38, 2.22; p = 0.947). No impact was observed on mortality (RR:1.00, 95% CI 0.45, 2.23, p = 0.995). Conclusion: G-CSF was associated with a reduction in LVEDV and improvement in LVEF in echocardiography studies, suggesting potential structural benefits. However, clinical outcomes remained unchanged. Larger, high-quality trials are needed to better understand the therapeutic role of G-CSF in AMI patients.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (BR), University of Iceland (IS), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (BR), Universidade Católica de Brasília (BR), Escola Superior de Ciências da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória (BR), Centro Universitário de Volta Redonda (BR), Centro Universitário Cesmac (BR), Universidade Federal de Roraima (BR), Centro Universitário Carioca (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.