Abstract 4372935: Efficacy evaluation of the novel concave supra-aortic branched stent-graft system and optimization scenarios for patient-specific endovascular total arch repair via hemodynamics

Introduction: Concave supra-aortic branched stent-graft (CSBSG) system offers a new option for managing aortic arch pathologies. However, therapeutic efficacy and appropriate implantation regimen of the innovative technique remain unclear. Aims: This study aims to quantify hemodynamic outcomes to assess therapeutic efficacy of CSBSG and then to investigate patient-specific optimization scenarios for further improving CSBSG performance. Methods: Numerical simulations are conducted via CTA datasets from first-in-human cases both before and after CSBSG implantation. Boundary conditions are obtained through three-element Windkessel model. Optimizations on concave degree (angle α) of CSBSG are analyzed in scenarios with patient-specific aortic diameter. Results: Results show that CSBSG insertion can effectively maintain supra-aortic branches blood flow, and will not significantly influence pressure in ascending aorta (AA) and hemodynamic environments whether postoperative blood pressure is normotensive or hypertensive (from 120/80 to 180/140 mmHg). Larger concave angle improves supra-aortic branches perfusion, but also increases pressure and oscillatory shear index in AA. More notable variations are found in patients treated by CSBSG with α ranging from 150° to 180° than from 120° to 150°. Additionally, effects of CSBSG implantation on hemodynamic parameters, e.g., time-averaged wall shear stress, are more pronounced in patients with smaller aortic diameters compared to those with larger diameters. Patients who have (i) larger AA and descending aorta (DA) diameters or (ii) smaller diameter differences between AA and DA, exhibit lower AA pressure, supra-aortic branches perfusion and total energy loss after CSBSG deployment compared with others. Conclusion: Results obtained can provide theoretical foundation in assessing CSBSG outcomes and guiding stent-graft design and determination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4372935
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4372935: Efficacy evaluation of the novel concave supra-aortic branched stent-graft system and optimization scenarios for patient-specific endovascular total arch repair via hemodynamics

Xiran Cao, Mingyao Luo, Chang Shu, Xuelan Zhang
Circulation
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
article

Abstract 4372935: Efficacy evaluation of the novel concave supra-aortic branched stent-graft system and optimization scenarios for patient-specific endovascular total arch repair via hemodynamics

Xiran Cao, Mingyao Luo, Chang Shu, Xuelan Zhang
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Concave supra-aortic branched stent-graft (CSBSG) system offers a new option for managing aortic arch pathologies. However, therapeutic efficacy and appropriate implantation regimen of the innovative technique remain unclear. Aims: This study aims to quantify hemodynamic outcomes to assess therapeutic efficacy of CSBSG and then to investigate patient-specific optimization scenarios for further improving CSBSG performance. Methods: Numerical simulations are conducted via CTA datasets from first-in-human cases both before and after CSBSG implantation. Boundary conditions are obtained through three-element Windkessel model. Optimizations on concave degree (angle α) of CSBSG are analyzed in scenarios with patient-specific aortic diameter. Results: Results show that CSBSG insertion can effectively maintain supra-aortic branches blood flow, and will not significantly influence pressure in ascending aorta (AA) and hemodynamic environments whether postoperative blood pressure is normotensive or hypertensive (from 120/80 to 180/140 mmHg). Larger concave angle improves supra-aortic branches perfusion, but also increases pressure and oscillatory shear index in AA. More notable variations are found in patients treated by CSBSG with α ranging from 150° to 180° than from 120° to 150°. Additionally, effects of CSBSG implantation on hemodynamic parameters, e.g., time-averaged wall shear stress, are more pronounced in patients with smaller aortic diameters compared to those with larger diameters. Patients who have (i) larger AA and descending aorta (DA) diameters or (ii) smaller diameter differences between AA and DA, exhibit lower AA pressure, supra-aortic branches perfusion and total energy loss after CSBSG deployment compared with others. Conclusion: Results obtained can provide theoretical foundation in assessing CSBSG outcomes and guiding stent-graft design and determination.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Beijing Information Science & Technology University (CN), University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.