Abstract 4365845: Low Rates Of Escalation Of Lipid Lowering Therapy Amongst Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Patients With Uncontrolled LDL-C

Background: In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), guidelines recommend a reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to target levels with statin therapy as required. Where targets are not achieved, escalation to higher intensity statin +/- additional lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is recommended. It is unknown to what extent adjustments in LLT are made after LLT initiation in routine practice, in relation to measured LDL-C levels. Aims: To document (i) testing and (ii) achievement of ESC guideline-recommended LDL-C levels (<1.8 mmol/L), in relation to (iii) prescribed LLT regimen during the first two years post-ASCVD diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective, population-level, observational study using linked anonymised population electronic health record (EHR) data amongst 178696 patients diagnosed with ASCVD between 2010-22, with at least one year of follow-up data. Patients were followed up for two years post-diagnosis, and censored at the point of death, migration, or loss of linked primary care data. Results: Within 90-days post-diagnosis only 36318 (20.3%) patients had LDL-C levels documented in their EHR, of which 7.3% were <1.8 mmol/L. Of those 23446 (13.1%) patients with LDL-C ≥1.8 mmol/L, 12.7% were receiving high-intensity statin therapy or combination LLT (HI), 40% had lower-intensity statin therapy or other LLT monotherapy (LI) and 47.3% were not treated (Figure 1). During the first-year post-diagnosis, only 4222 (2.4%) had LDL-C tested and 929 (22%) of these achieved target. Of those not achieving target, 15.9% were prescribed HI-LLT, 43.4% LI-LLT, and 40.7% were not treated (Figure 1). Among patients with no test at one-year, 48.1% were prescribed LLT and 51.9% were not treated. Of those not treated, 78.7% received no test or treatment by two-years post-diagnosis. By two-years post-ASCVD diagnosis, 12.5%, 27.2%, and 54.5% were prescribed HI, LI, and no LLT respectively. Figure 1 illustrates that most patients were not tested following 90-days post-diagnosis and remained on the initial LLT regime over the subsequent two-years. Conclusions: Management of lipids was below guideline-recommended standards in the early years following ASCVD diagnosis in the population, with low levels of testing and escalation in lipid treatment regimen uncommon, even when indicated by documented LDL-C levels. A more rigorous system-wide approach to LLT is required to maximise the potential benefits among these very high-risk patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4365845
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4365845: Low Rates Of Escalation Of Lipid Lowering Therapy Amongst Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Patients With Uncontrolled LDL-C

Julian Halcox, Mike B. Gravenor, Ashley Akbari, Daniel King et al.
Circulation
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Abstract 4365845: Low Rates Of Escalation Of Lipid Lowering Therapy Amongst Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Patients With Uncontrolled LDL-C

Julian Halcox, Mike B. Gravenor, Ashley Akbari, Daniel King, Daniel Harris
article en

Abstract

Background: In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), guidelines recommend a reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to target levels with statin therapy as required. Where targets are not achieved, escalation to higher intensity statin +/- additional lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is recommended. It is unknown to what extent adjustments in LLT are made after LLT initiation in routine practice, in relation to measured LDL-C levels. Aims: To document (i) testing and (ii) achievement of ESC guideline-recommended LDL-C levels (<1.8 mmol/L), in relation to (iii) prescribed LLT regimen during the first two years post-ASCVD diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective, population-level, observational study using linked anonymised population electronic health record (EHR) data amongst 178696 patients diagnosed with ASCVD between 2010-22, with at least one year of follow-up data. Patients were followed up for two years post-diagnosis, and censored at the point of death, migration, or loss of linked primary care data. Results: Within 90-days post-diagnosis only 36318 (20.3%) patients had LDL-C levels documented in their EHR, of which 7.3% were <1.8 mmol/L. Of those 23446 (13.1%) patients with LDL-C ≥1.8 mmol/L, 12.7% were receiving high-intensity statin therapy or combination LLT (HI), 40% had lower-intensity statin therapy or other LLT monotherapy (LI) and 47.3% were not treated (Figure 1). During the first-year post-diagnosis, only 4222 (2.4%) had LDL-C tested and 929 (22%) of these achieved target. Of those not achieving target, 15.9% were prescribed HI-LLT, 43.4% LI-LLT, and 40.7% were not treated (Figure 1). Among patients with no test at one-year, 48.1% were prescribed LLT and 51.9% were not treated. Of those not treated, 78.7% received no test or treatment by two-years post-diagnosis. By two-years post-ASCVD diagnosis, 12.5%, 27.2%, and 54.5% were prescribed HI, LI, and no LLT respectively. Figure 1 illustrates that most patients were not tested following 90-days post-diagnosis and remained on the initial LLT regime over the subsequent two-years. Conclusions: Management of lipids was below guideline-recommended standards in the early years following ASCVD diagnosis in the population, with low levels of testing and escalation in lipid treatment regimen uncommon, even when indicated by documented LDL-C levels. A more rigorous system-wide approach to LLT is required to maximise the potential benefits among these very high-risk patients.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Swansea University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.