Abstract 4364542: Aspirin Use for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in High Risk Patients with Diabetes: A Propensity Matched Analysis

Background: Aspirin (ASA) use for primary prevention of ASCVD events is no longer regularly recommended. However, little is known about how ASA adherence influences cardiovascular outcomes in diabetic patients based on their glycemic control and ASCVD risk. We investigated the impact of ASA use and adherence frequency on ASCVD outcomes in patients with diabetes, stratified by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Methods: Using an EHR generated primary prevention registry across a large healthcare network (>400+ sites), ASA use (no use, <30% of the time, 30% - < 70% of the time and ≥ 70% of the time) was assessed in patients with moderate or high 10-year ASCVD risk score. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:2 ratio) was performed to balance baseline characteristics between ASA users and non-users. Cumulative Incidence Function (CIF) and Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses were conducted on the PSM cohort to compare outcomes between ASA treatment groups. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. Subgroup analyses evaluated effect modification by HbA1c categories (6.5–7%, 7–9%, >9%) Results: In 11,681patients (61.6 ± 9.79 years, 46.24% female), 88.6% were ASA and 53.15% were statin users at anytime during 10-year follow up. Cumulative incidence of MI (42.4% vs 61.2%), Stroke (14.5% vs 24.8%), 10-year all-cause mortality (33.0% vs 50.7%), all p<0.001 was significantly lower in PSM ASA group compared to No ASA group. [ Table 1 ]. Any ASA use was associated with significantly lower hazards of MI and ischemic stroke compared to no ASA use with greater benefit observed in the high frequency use group (HR MI : 0.54 [0.50–0.58]; HR STROKE : 0.47 [0.41–0.53]; both p<0.001) [ Table 2 ]. Subgroup analysis by HbA1c showed consistent benefit of ASA (with statin use) across glycemic strata, though the magnitude of benefit declined with worse glycemic control. [ Table 3 ]. Mortality reduction was also more pronounced in better-controlled groups. Conclusion: Aspirin use is associated with significant reductions in MI, stroke, and mortality among high-risk patients with diabetes, with greater frequency conferring more benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4364542
Primary Topic
Medication Adherence and Compliance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4364542: Aspirin Use for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in High Risk Patients with Diabetes: A Propensity Matched Analysis

Pallavi Muluk, Oscar C. Marroquin, Floyd Thoma, Anum Saeed et al.
Circulation
Medication Adherence and Compliance
article

Abstract 4364542: Aspirin Use for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in High Risk Patients with Diabetes: A Propensity Matched Analysis

Pallavi Muluk, Oscar C. Marroquin, Floyd Thoma, Anum Saeed, Suresh Mulukutla, Aleesha Kainat, Jianhui Zhu
article en

Abstract

Background: Aspirin (ASA) use for primary prevention of ASCVD events is no longer regularly recommended. However, little is known about how ASA adherence influences cardiovascular outcomes in diabetic patients based on their glycemic control and ASCVD risk. We investigated the impact of ASA use and adherence frequency on ASCVD outcomes in patients with diabetes, stratified by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Methods: Using an EHR generated primary prevention registry across a large healthcare network (>400+ sites), ASA use (no use, <30% of the time, 30% - < 70% of the time and ≥ 70% of the time) was assessed in patients with moderate or high 10-year ASCVD risk score. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:2 ratio) was performed to balance baseline characteristics between ASA users and non-users. Cumulative Incidence Function (CIF) and Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses were conducted on the PSM cohort to compare outcomes between ASA treatment groups. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. Subgroup analyses evaluated effect modification by HbA1c categories (6.5–7%, 7–9%, >9%) Results: In 11,681patients (61.6 ± 9.79 years, 46.24% female), 88.6% were ASA and 53.15% were statin users at anytime during 10-year follow up. Cumulative incidence of MI (42.4% vs 61.2%), Stroke (14.5% vs 24.8%), 10-year all-cause mortality (33.0% vs 50.7%), all p<0.001 was significantly lower in PSM ASA group compared to No ASA group. [ Table 1 ]. Any ASA use was associated with significantly lower hazards of MI and ischemic stroke compared to no ASA use with greater benefit observed in the high frequency use group (HR MI : 0.54 [0.50–0.58]; HR STROKE : 0.47 [0.41–0.53]; both p<0.001) [ Table 2 ]. Subgroup analysis by HbA1c showed consistent benefit of ASA (with statin use) across glycemic strata, though the magnitude of benefit declined with worse glycemic control. [ Table 3 ]. Mortality reduction was also more pronounced in better-controlled groups. Conclusion: Aspirin use is associated with significant reductions in MI, stroke, and mortality among high-risk patients with diabetes, with greater frequency conferring more benefit.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Medication Adherence and Compliance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.