Abstract 4370397: Prognosis of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) Stages: The Dallas Heart Study

Background: The recent AHA presidential advisory on Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome (CKM) proposed a novel staging scheme, but limited data exist regarding the associations of CKM Stages with incident cardiovascular events and mortality. Methods: We included participants in the Dallas Heart Study, a population-sampled cohort from Dallas County, who attended study Visit 1 (2000-2002) and underwent protocol measurement of body composition, lipids, fasting blood sugar, serum creatinine, NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, urinary albumin and creatinine, coronary artery calcium by cardiac CT (CAC), and cardiac function and mass by cardiac MRI. CKM Stages were defined as per AHA CKM definitions: Stage 0 – no CKM risk factors; 1 – excess or dysfunctional adiposity; 2 – metabolic risk factors and/or chronic kidney disease; 3 – subclinical cardiovascular diseases [CAC, left ventricular hypertrophy or dysfunction by cardiac MRI, elevated cardiac biomarkers (NT-proBNP or hs-cTnT), high AHA-PREVENT or KDIGO scores]; 4 – prevalent cardiovascular diseases [coronary heart disease (CHD), heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation, stroke]. Participants were followed for fatal and non-fatal clinical outcomes, including CHD, HF, and stroke through December 31 th 2018. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the relationship of the CKM Stage with incident events compared to absent CKM or Stage 1, adjusting for age, sex, and race. Results: Among the 2,991 participants (age 44±10 years, 56% female, 50% reported non-Hispanic Black race), CKM stage prevalence was 9% Stage 0, 14% Stage 1, 47% Stage 2, 22% Stage 3, and 7% Stage 4. Over a median follow-up of 16.9 (IQR 16.4 -17.6) years, 19% died or developed CHD, HF, or stroke. No significant differences in risk were observed between Stage 0 and Stage 1 for composite and individual outcomes. Compared to those with Stage 0 or 1 CKM, a graded association was observed between greater CKM Stage 2-4 and heightened risk of composite CHD, HF, stroke, or death [HR 1.8 (95% CI 1.3-2.5), 3.5 (2.5-4.8), 5.4 (3.8-7.8), respectively] in adjusted model. Similar trends were observed for each component of the composite ( Figure) . Conclusion: Over 17 years of follow-up, individuals with CKM Stage 1 did not experience worse outcomes than those free of CKM Stage. CKM Stages 2, 3, and 4 were associated with a stepwise higher risk of all cause mortality and incident CHD, HF, and stroke compared to those with Stage 0 or 1 CKM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370397
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370397: Prognosis of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) Stages: The Dallas Heart Study

Chiadi E. Ndumele, Colby Ayers, Amit Khera, Parag H. Joshi et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4370397: Prognosis of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) Stages: The Dallas Heart Study

Chiadi E. Ndumele, Colby Ayers, Amit Khera, Parag H. Joshi, Amil M. Shah, James A. de Lemos, Khaled Shelbaya, Ian J. Neeland, Anand K. Rohatgi, Victoria Lamberson, Yimin Yang, Yinun Zeleke
article en

Abstract

Background: The recent AHA presidential advisory on Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome (CKM) proposed a novel staging scheme, but limited data exist regarding the associations of CKM Stages with incident cardiovascular events and mortality. Methods: We included participants in the Dallas Heart Study, a population-sampled cohort from Dallas County, who attended study Visit 1 (2000-2002) and underwent protocol measurement of body composition, lipids, fasting blood sugar, serum creatinine, NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, urinary albumin and creatinine, coronary artery calcium by cardiac CT (CAC), and cardiac function and mass by cardiac MRI. CKM Stages were defined as per AHA CKM definitions: Stage 0 – no CKM risk factors; 1 – excess or dysfunctional adiposity; 2 – metabolic risk factors and/or chronic kidney disease; 3 – subclinical cardiovascular diseases [CAC, left ventricular hypertrophy or dysfunction by cardiac MRI, elevated cardiac biomarkers (NT-proBNP or hs-cTnT), high AHA-PREVENT or KDIGO scores]; 4 – prevalent cardiovascular diseases [coronary heart disease (CHD), heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation, stroke]. Participants were followed for fatal and non-fatal clinical outcomes, including CHD, HF, and stroke through December 31 th 2018. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the relationship of the CKM Stage with incident events compared to absent CKM or Stage 1, adjusting for age, sex, and race. Results: Among the 2,991 participants (age 44±10 years, 56% female, 50% reported non-Hispanic Black race), CKM stage prevalence was 9% Stage 0, 14% Stage 1, 47% Stage 2, 22% Stage 3, and 7% Stage 4. Over a median follow-up of 16.9 (IQR 16.4 -17.6) years, 19% died or developed CHD, HF, or stroke. No significant differences in risk were observed between Stage 0 and Stage 1 for composite and individual outcomes. Compared to those with Stage 0 or 1 CKM, a graded association was observed between greater CKM Stage 2-4 and heightened risk of composite CHD, HF, stroke, or death [HR 1.8 (95% CI 1.3-2.5), 3.5 (2.5-4.8), 5.4 (3.8-7.8), respectively] in adjusted model. Similar trends were observed for each component of the composite ( Figure) . Conclusion: Over 17 years of follow-up, individuals with CKM Stage 1 did not experience worse outcomes than those free of CKM Stage. CKM Stages 2, 3, and 4 were associated with a stepwise higher risk of all cause mortality and incident CHD, HF, and stroke compared to those with Stage 0 or 1 CKM.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Southwestern Medical Center (US), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.