Abstract 4365814: Impact of Lipoprotein(a) on Aortic Valve Replacement in Chinese Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS), but its association with aortic valve replacement (AVR) risk in the Chinese population remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of Lp(a) levels for clinical outcomes in patients with mild-to-moderate aortic stenosis (AS). Hypothesis: Elevated Lp(a) levels are associated with an increased risk of AVR in patients with CAVS. Methods: This prospective study enrolled hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate CAVS (peak aortic jet velocity ≤4.0 m/s) from Fuwai Hospital between June 2013 and May 2014. Patients who had undergone baseline AVR or had severe comorbidities were excluded. Participants were stratified by baseline Lp(a) levels (cutoffs: 300 mg/L and 500 mg/L). The association between Lp(a) and the primary endpoint (AVR) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Results: Among 238 patients with complete follow-up (median follow-up: 6.2 years), the mean age of the patients was 66.0 ± 13.0 years, and 104 (43.7%) were females. The median baseline Lp(a) level was 197.2 mg/L (IQR: 78.8–398.5 mg/L). The high Lp(a) groups (≥300 mg/L or ≥500 mg/L) had a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia (all P <0.01). Multivariable analysis revealed that patients with Lp(a) ≥500 mg/L had a 68% higher AVR risk compared to those with Lp(a) <500 mg/L (adjusted HR=1.688, 95% CI: 1.108–2.573, P=0.0149), while those with Lp(a) ≥300 mg/L had a 61% increased risk (adjusted HR=1.616, 95% CI: 1.135–2.300, P=0.0077). Additionally, the Lp(a) ≥300 mg/L group had a higher progression rate to moderate-to-severe AS (56.2% vs. 35%, P <0.05). Conclusion: Elevated Lp(a) levels (≥300 mg/L or ≥500 mg/L) are independently associated with an increased risk of AVR in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate AS, suggesting its potential role in risk stratification and prognostic assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4365814
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4365814: Impact of Lipoprotein(a) on Aortic Valve Replacement in Chinese Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis

Fang Luo, xiao wang, Chen Liu, Xi Li et al.
Circulation
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Abstract 4365814: Impact of Lipoprotein(a) on Aortic Valve Replacement in Chinese Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis

Fang Luo, xiao wang, Chen Liu, Xi Li, Wenjia Zhang, Xiaoning Liu, Zheng Yin, Ke-Fei Dou, Menghan Lu, Na Wu, Zhang Li, Yan-Lu Xu
article en

Abstract

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS), but its association with aortic valve replacement (AVR) risk in the Chinese population remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of Lp(a) levels for clinical outcomes in patients with mild-to-moderate aortic stenosis (AS). Hypothesis: Elevated Lp(a) levels are associated with an increased risk of AVR in patients with CAVS. Methods: This prospective study enrolled hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate CAVS (peak aortic jet velocity ≤4.0 m/s) from Fuwai Hospital between June 2013 and May 2014. Patients who had undergone baseline AVR or had severe comorbidities were excluded. Participants were stratified by baseline Lp(a) levels (cutoffs: 300 mg/L and 500 mg/L). The association between Lp(a) and the primary endpoint (AVR) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Results: Among 238 patients with complete follow-up (median follow-up: 6.2 years), the mean age of the patients was 66.0 ± 13.0 years, and 104 (43.7%) were females. The median baseline Lp(a) level was 197.2 mg/L (IQR: 78.8–398.5 mg/L). The high Lp(a) groups (≥300 mg/L or ≥500 mg/L) had a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia (all P <0.01). Multivariable analysis revealed that patients with Lp(a) ≥500 mg/L had a 68% higher AVR risk compared to those with Lp(a) <500 mg/L (adjusted HR=1.688, 95% CI: 1.108–2.573, P=0.0149), while those with Lp(a) ≥300 mg/L had a 61% increased risk (adjusted HR=1.616, 95% CI: 1.135–2.300, P=0.0077). Additionally, the Lp(a) ≥300 mg/L group had a higher progression rate to moderate-to-severe AS (56.2% vs. 35%, P <0.05). Conclusion: Elevated Lp(a) levels (≥300 mg/L or ≥500 mg/L) are independently associated with an increased risk of AVR in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate AS, suggesting its potential role in risk stratification and prognostic assessment.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Fu Wai Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.