Abstract 4373413: Analysing the Capabilities of Recent Artificial Intelligence Models in Detecting Atrial Fibrillation Using Patient Electrocardiograms

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and it imparts significant morbidity and mortality. A substantial proportion of AF remains undiagnosed. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool to enhance early AF detection. This systematic review and meta-analysis critically evaluates the diagnostic performance of AI models for AF by using patient electrocardiograms (ECGs). Objectives: To systematically appraise and quantitatively synthesize the diagnostic accuracy of AI algorithms for AF detection, using databases of patient ECGs previously validated by cardiologists. Methods: Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and IEEE Xplore from January 2016 - June 2025 to identify studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of AI algorithms for AF detection, only using databases consisting of patient ECGs with prior cardiologist validation, irrespective of comparator. 73 quality studies were included for the study. Only the 9 most recent publications (January 2024–June 2025) were included in this analysis Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool; discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Pooled accuracy estimates were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis in R, adhering to PRISMA-DTA guidelines. Results: Nine studies were included. AI algorithms demonstrated robust diagnostic accuracy for AF, yielding a pooled accuracy of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.90 to 0.99; p < 0.0001). Individual study estimates ranged from 0.78 to 1.00, with the majority exceeding 0.95, underscoring the high discriminative capacity of contemporary AI models. Heterogeneity was substantial (I 2 = 98.7%), reflecting variability in algorithmic architecture and validation cohorts. Conclusions: AI and deep learning algorithms represent a paradigm shift in AF detection, addressing limitations of conventional diagnostic approaches. Our synthesis demonstrates that AI models achieve exceptional diagnostic accuracy using patient ECGs as samples, highlighting their transformative potential for scalable, early detection. However, substantial heterogeneity underscores the necessity for rigorous external validation, algorithmic transparency, and bias mitigation to ensure equitable clinical integration and to fully realize the promise of AI-driven cardiovascular diagnostics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4373413
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4373413: Analysing the Capabilities of Recent Artificial Intelligence Models in Detecting Atrial Fibrillation Using Patient Electrocardiograms

Umar Amin Qureshi, Elangovan Krishnan, Harshkumar Patel, ALAN OSWALD FRANKLIN JOHNSON et al.
Circulation
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
article

Abstract 4373413: Analysing the Capabilities of Recent Artificial Intelligence Models in Detecting Atrial Fibrillation Using Patient Electrocardiograms

Umar Amin Qureshi, Elangovan Krishnan, Harshkumar Patel, ALAN OSWALD FRANKLIN JOHNSON, Krish Patel, Syeda Fatima Hamna, Ramya Elangovan, Jansi Sethuraj, Kavin Elangovan
article en

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and it imparts significant morbidity and mortality. A substantial proportion of AF remains undiagnosed. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool to enhance early AF detection. This systematic review and meta-analysis critically evaluates the diagnostic performance of AI models for AF by using patient electrocardiograms (ECGs). Objectives: To systematically appraise and quantitatively synthesize the diagnostic accuracy of AI algorithms for AF detection, using databases of patient ECGs previously validated by cardiologists. Methods: Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and IEEE Xplore from January 2016 - June 2025 to identify studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of AI algorithms for AF detection, only using databases consisting of patient ECGs with prior cardiologist validation, irrespective of comparator. 73 quality studies were included for the study. Only the 9 most recent publications (January 2024–June 2025) were included in this analysis Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool; discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Pooled accuracy estimates were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis in R, adhering to PRISMA-DTA guidelines. Results: Nine studies were included. AI algorithms demonstrated robust diagnostic accuracy for AF, yielding a pooled accuracy of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.90 to 0.99; p < 0.0001). Individual study estimates ranged from 0.78 to 1.00, with the majority exceeding 0.95, underscoring the high discriminative capacity of contemporary AI models. Heterogeneity was substantial (I 2 = 98.7%), reflecting variability in algorithmic architecture and validation cohorts. Conclusions: AI and deep learning algorithms represent a paradigm shift in AF detection, addressing limitations of conventional diagnostic approaches. Our synthesis demonstrates that AI models achieve exceptional diagnostic accuracy using patient ECGs as samples, highlighting their transformative potential for scalable, early detection. However, substantial heterogeneity underscores the necessity for rigorous external validation, algorithmic transparency, and bias mitigation to ensure equitable clinical integration and to fully realize the promise of AI-driven cardiovascular diagnostics.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Thiruvalluvar University (IN), Government Medical College (IN), Christian Medical College, Vellore (IN), Farooq Hospital (PK), Aims Community College (US), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK), CU Shah Medical College and Hospital (IN), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.