Abstract 4361451: Prevalence and Outcomes of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

Background: Although antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are classically associated with excess risk of thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), emerging data suggest that aPLs may confer a prognostic role in patients with cardiovascular conditions who do not fulfill traditional research criteria for APS. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of aPL seropositivity among patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and to assess outcomes among those with and without aPL. Methods: In this study, as part of a larger project (PROSPERO ID CRD420251047305), we systematically searched PubMed and Embase through 3/11/2025 to determine the pooled prevalence of aPL seropositivity among patients with PAD. Despite variation in PAD severity across studies, aPL testing occurred in unselected individuals (rather than by clinical suspicion). aPL positivity was defined as at least one single positive measurement for either anticardiolipin, anti-β2 glycoprotein, or lupus anticoagulant. For studies with longitudinal data available, we assessed a composite outcome of subsequent arterial thrombosis, revascularization failure, amputations, and death stratified by aPL seropositivity. Random-effects models with inverse weights were used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs). Results: Among 2,890 records, we identified 31 studies assessing aPL prevalence and 11 evaluating clinical outcomes (3,364 total patients, mean age 58.6 years, 62.3% men). Seropositivity for at least one aPL was observed in 21.1% of patients with PAD (95% CI, 19.7%-22.5%). aPL seropositivity was associated with a significantly higher odds of the primary outcome (OR: 2.49, 95% CI 1.48-4.18) (Figure). Among patients who underwent revascularization, aPL seropositivity was associated with a higher odds of a failed revascularization procedure (OR: 2.72, 95% CI 1.49-4.98). Conclusion: aPL seropositivity is present in approximately one-in-five patients with PAD and correlates with a subsequent risk of adverse clinical events. Whether early testing can help inform management strategies and improve outcomes requires further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4361451
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4361451: Prevalence and Outcomes of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

Saman Asad Siddiqui, Sina Rashedi, Geoffrey D. Barnes, Samuel Z. Goldhaber et al.
1 citations
Circulation
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
1.67
article

Abstract 4361451: Prevalence and Outcomes of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

Saman Asad Siddiqui, Sina Rashedi, Geoffrey D. Barnes, Samuel Z. Goldhaber, Behnood Bikdeli, Mattía Galli, Nathan Watson, Eric A. Secemsky, Manuel Monréal, Brittany Weber, Jean M. Connors, Sacha Uljon, Mariana Pfeferman, Jason S. Knight, Karen H. Costenbader, Harlan M. Krumholz, David Jiménez, Gregory Piazza, Gregory Lip, Mary Cushman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Although antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are classically associated with excess risk of thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), emerging data suggest that aPLs may confer a prognostic role in patients with cardiovascular conditions who do not fulfill traditional research criteria for APS. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of aPL seropositivity among patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and to assess outcomes among those with and without aPL. Methods: In this study, as part of a larger project (PROSPERO ID CRD420251047305), we systematically searched PubMed and Embase through 3/11/2025 to determine the pooled prevalence of aPL seropositivity among patients with PAD. Despite variation in PAD severity across studies, aPL testing occurred in unselected individuals (rather than by clinical suspicion). aPL positivity was defined as at least one single positive measurement for either anticardiolipin, anti-β2 glycoprotein, or lupus anticoagulant. For studies with longitudinal data available, we assessed a composite outcome of subsequent arterial thrombosis, revascularization failure, amputations, and death stratified by aPL seropositivity. Random-effects models with inverse weights were used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs). Results: Among 2,890 records, we identified 31 studies assessing aPL prevalence and 11 evaluating clinical outcomes (3,364 total patients, mean age 58.6 years, 62.3% men). Seropositivity for at least one aPL was observed in 21.1% of patients with PAD (95% CI, 19.7%-22.5%). aPL seropositivity was associated with a significantly higher odds of the primary outcome (OR: 2.49, 95% CI 1.48-4.18) (Figure). Among patients who underwent revascularization, aPL seropositivity was associated with a higher odds of a failed revascularization procedure (OR: 2.72, 95% CI 1.49-4.98). Conclusion: aPL seropositivity is present in approximately one-in-five patients with PAD and correlates with a subsequent risk of adverse clinical events. Whether early testing can help inform management strategies and improve outcomes requires further investigation.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Vermont (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), University of Liverpool (GB), Universidad de Alcalá (ES), University of Michigan (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital (US), Yale University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Michigan United (US), Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES), Universidad Católica de Murcia (ES), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.