Abstract 4361453: Inaccurate information regarding cardiovascular disease prevention enabled by generative artificial intelligence

Background: Inaccurate information regarding cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention is present on the internet and may influence medical decisions. Artificial intelligence “bots” are prevalent on the internet and may be used for medical questions. Research Question: This physician-led experiment evaluated the generation of inaccurate CVD information on two widely used generative artificial intelligence (genAI) models, namely OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek-R1. Methods: This experiment was performed in Februrary 2025. Information was generated by OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek-R1 in response to prompts related to nine cardiovascular disease prevention topics, including statin therapy, LDL cholesterol and supplements. The prompts varied in two “tones”: a “neutral” tone, and a “misinformation” tone requesting inaccurate information. Two board-certified cardiologists specializing in preventive cardiology at a tertiary care center reviewed each response and agreed on a single grade. Responses were graded as appropriate (accurate content), borderline (minor inaccuracies that are not likely to be clinically meaningful), or inappropriate (inaccurate content that is likely to be clinically meaningful). Results: For neutral tone prompts, 88.9% (8/9) of OpenAI o1 responses and 66.7% (6/9) of DeepSeek R1 responses were appropriate (table 1, 2). For misinformation-prompting prompts, OpenAI o1 produced no appropriate responses; 77.8% (7/9) were inappropriate, and 22.2% (2/9) borderline. DeepSeek R1 produced inappropriate responses for all misinformation prompts (9/9). Conclusion: In this physician-led qualitative experiment, OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek R1, two popular and publicly accessible genAI models, were easily prompted to support inaccurate information regarding CVD prevention topics that are widely relevant to the health of patients, including statins, supplements, and LDL cholesterol. Findings suggest that LLM-powered automated personas on the internet could propagate inaccurate CVD information with ease. Further research is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4361453
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4361453: Inaccurate information regarding cardiovascular disease prevention enabled by generative artificial intelligence

Vikas Sunder, Fátima Rodríguez, Asha S. Multani, Bianca Honnekeri et al.
Circulation
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Abstract 4361453: Inaccurate information regarding cardiovascular disease prevention enabled by generative artificial intelligence

Vikas Sunder, Fátima Rodríguez, Asha S. Multani, Bianca Honnekeri, Steven E. Nissen, Leslie Cho, Ashish Sarraju, Dennis Bruemmer, Luke J. Laffin, Astefanos Al-Dalakta
article en

Abstract

Background: Inaccurate information regarding cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention is present on the internet and may influence medical decisions. Artificial intelligence “bots” are prevalent on the internet and may be used for medical questions. Research Question: This physician-led experiment evaluated the generation of inaccurate CVD information on two widely used generative artificial intelligence (genAI) models, namely OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek-R1. Methods: This experiment was performed in Februrary 2025. Information was generated by OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek-R1 in response to prompts related to nine cardiovascular disease prevention topics, including statin therapy, LDL cholesterol and supplements. The prompts varied in two “tones”: a “neutral” tone, and a “misinformation” tone requesting inaccurate information. Two board-certified cardiologists specializing in preventive cardiology at a tertiary care center reviewed each response and agreed on a single grade. Responses were graded as appropriate (accurate content), borderline (minor inaccuracies that are not likely to be clinically meaningful), or inappropriate (inaccurate content that is likely to be clinically meaningful). Results: For neutral tone prompts, 88.9% (8/9) of OpenAI o1 responses and 66.7% (6/9) of DeepSeek R1 responses were appropriate (table 1, 2). For misinformation-prompting prompts, OpenAI o1 produced no appropriate responses; 77.8% (7/9) were inappropriate, and 22.2% (2/9) borderline. DeepSeek R1 produced inappropriate responses for all misinformation prompts (9/9). Conclusion: In this physician-led qualitative experiment, OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek R1, two popular and publicly accessible genAI models, were easily prompted to support inaccurate information regarding CVD prevention topics that are widely relevant to the health of patients, including statins, supplements, and LDL cholesterol. Findings suggest that LLM-powered automated personas on the internet could propagate inaccurate CVD information with ease. Further research is warranted.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Palo Alto University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.