Abstract 4368054: Gender and Racial Disparities in Heart Transplantation Under the Updated US Regulations: Multicenter Analysis

Background: Racial and gender disparities in heart transplant access and outcomes were well documented prior to 2018. On October 18, 2018, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) implemented a revised Adult Heart Allocation Policy aimed at improving equity. This study examines whether such disparities have persisted in the post-policy era. Method: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the United States TriNetX platform, which aggregates records from 66 healthcare organizations. Heart transplant recipients from 2018 to 2023 were identified and stratified by gender and race. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics between groups. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, while secondary outcomes included heart failure and all-cause hospitalization, transplant rejection, sepsis and end-stage renal disease. Hazard ratios were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Between 2018 and 2023, a total of 2,569 heart transplant recipients were identified, including 1,862 males (72.5%) and 707 females (27.5%). The racial distribution included 1,414 White (55.0%), 722 African American (28.1%), 216 Hispanic (8.4%), and 56 Asian (2.2%) patients. No significant differences in mortality were observed across sex or racial groups. However, female recipients had significantly higher risks of adverse outcomes compared to males, including heart failure (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.11–2.28), transplant rejection (HR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.09–1.46), and rehospitalization (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07–1.38). African American recipients experienced a significantly lower rate of transplant rejection compared to White recipients (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.62–0.84, p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in heart failure hospitalization, ESRD, or all-cause hospitalization among racial groups. Conclusions: The findings suggest that while disparities in heart transplant outcomes have improved since the 2018 allocation policy change, significant gaps remain. Female recipients continue to face higher risks of adverse outcomes, and although racial differences in mortality were not observed, certain disparities—such as in transplant rejection rates—persist. These results highlight progress toward equity but underscore the need for continued efforts to eliminate sex- and race-based differences in post-transplant outcomes fully.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4368054
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4368054: Gender and Racial Disparities in Heart Transplantation Under the Updated US Regulations: Multicenter Analysis

Hafiz Muhammad Waqar Younas, Muhammad Shah Wali Jamal, Mohammed Othman, Lalitsiri Atti et al.
Circulation
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4368054: Gender and Racial Disparities in Heart Transplantation Under the Updated US Regulations: Multicenter Analysis

Hafiz Muhammad Waqar Younas, Muhammad Shah Wali Jamal, Mohammed Othman, Lalitsiri Atti, Harshith Thyagaturu, Amro Taha, Mohamed Al Hajji, Sudarshan Balla, Ahmed Taha, Uzair Malik, Alaa Al Hajji
article en

Abstract

Background: Racial and gender disparities in heart transplant access and outcomes were well documented prior to 2018. On October 18, 2018, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) implemented a revised Adult Heart Allocation Policy aimed at improving equity. This study examines whether such disparities have persisted in the post-policy era. Method: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the United States TriNetX platform, which aggregates records from 66 healthcare organizations. Heart transplant recipients from 2018 to 2023 were identified and stratified by gender and race. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics between groups. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, while secondary outcomes included heart failure and all-cause hospitalization, transplant rejection, sepsis and end-stage renal disease. Hazard ratios were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Between 2018 and 2023, a total of 2,569 heart transplant recipients were identified, including 1,862 males (72.5%) and 707 females (27.5%). The racial distribution included 1,414 White (55.0%), 722 African American (28.1%), 216 Hispanic (8.4%), and 56 Asian (2.2%) patients. No significant differences in mortality were observed across sex or racial groups. However, female recipients had significantly higher risks of adverse outcomes compared to males, including heart failure (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.11–2.28), transplant rejection (HR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.09–1.46), and rehospitalization (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07–1.38). African American recipients experienced a significantly lower rate of transplant rejection compared to White recipients (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.62–0.84, p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in heart failure hospitalization, ESRD, or all-cause hospitalization among racial groups. Conclusions: The findings suggest that while disparities in heart transplant outcomes have improved since the 2018 allocation policy change, significant gaps remain. Female recipients continue to face higher risks of adverse outcomes, and although racial differences in mortality were not observed, certain disparities—such as in transplant rejection rates—persist. These results highlight progress toward equity but underscore the need for continued efforts to eliminate sex- and race-based differences in post-transplant outcomes fully.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
West Virginia University (US), King Edward Medical University (PK), Weiss Memorial Hospital (US), Augusta University Health (US), Bon Secours Heart & Vascular Institute (US), Michigan United (US), Arrow International (United States) (US), Helwan University (EG), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.