Abstract 4357398: Artificial-Intelligence Based Smart Catheter Guidance for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Large Registry Validation

Background: Ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) by pulmonary vein (PV) isolation has limited success in some patients. However, identifying additional ablation targets in such patients currently requires mapping the entire atrium, which is time-consuming and poorly accounts for real-time changes. Objectives: We developed an Artificial-Intelligence (AI) based system that can guide an electrophysiology catheter in real-time (i.e. left/right, superior/inferior) during AF from an arbitrary location directly to sites leading to AF termination or 1Y success (fig. A). We validated the system in a large registry, and evaluated projected time savings from this approach. Methods: coPilot is an AI-system developed and tested in separate cohorts on ~20 million electrograms in a N=236 patient registry with physiological and clinical ground truth labels. First, we trained recurrent neural network (RNN) models to estimate AF activation times using unipolar and bipolar electrogram features (first derivative dV/dt, shape), tuned in a random forest classifier to experts informed by monophasic action potential (MAP) tracings (fig. B; top). Second, we applied this AI-model to multi-electrode catheters (e.g. local HDGrid, global Basket), to calculate predominant AF wave direction (fig. B bottom). Third, we validated if moving a catheter in AI-indicated directions reached successful AF ablation sites in a hold-out set not used for training. Results: The validation cohort was 69.0±8.3 years’ and 72.6% had non-paroxysmal AF. In Fig. B, AF activation times by traditional electrogram features were noisy versus MAPs (arrows). Fig. B (bottom) shows AI-activation times on a multi-electrode array in a 67Y woman in persistent AF, showing predominantly up/left activity over time. The array was moved accordingly and analysis repeated (steps 1-4 in fig. A, top), until the AF termination site was reached. coPilot pointed to 85.7% of AF termination versus 13.1% of control sites (p<0.01, fig. C). coPilot also reached sites ablated in cases of long-term success (68.8% at 1Y). Time to the successful region was 4.2±1.1 movements (estimated <5 minutes) that was shorter than atrial mapping time (>10-15 minutes). Conclusions: A novel AI-based system trained to physiological and clinical gold standards can rapidly steer a clinical catheter during AF to successful ablation sites. This approach has promise for improving the success of AF ablation while reducing case time over existing strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4357398
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4357398: Artificial-Intelligence Based Smart Catheter Guidance for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Large Registry Validation

Thomas Fillon, Chad Brodt, Sanjiv M. Narayan, Mitchell N. Faddis et al.
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4357398: Artificial-Intelligence Based Smart Catheter Guidance for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Large Registry Validation

Thomas Fillon, Chad Brodt, Sanjiv M. Narayan, Mitchell N. Faddis, Samuel Ruipérez-Campillo
article en

Abstract

Background: Ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) by pulmonary vein (PV) isolation has limited success in some patients. However, identifying additional ablation targets in such patients currently requires mapping the entire atrium, which is time-consuming and poorly accounts for real-time changes. Objectives: We developed an Artificial-Intelligence (AI) based system that can guide an electrophysiology catheter in real-time (i.e. left/right, superior/inferior) during AF from an arbitrary location directly to sites leading to AF termination or 1Y success (fig. A). We validated the system in a large registry, and evaluated projected time savings from this approach. Methods: coPilot is an AI-system developed and tested in separate cohorts on ~20 million electrograms in a N=236 patient registry with physiological and clinical ground truth labels. First, we trained recurrent neural network (RNN) models to estimate AF activation times using unipolar and bipolar electrogram features (first derivative dV/dt, shape), tuned in a random forest classifier to experts informed by monophasic action potential (MAP) tracings (fig. B; top). Second, we applied this AI-model to multi-electrode catheters (e.g. local HDGrid, global Basket), to calculate predominant AF wave direction (fig. B bottom). Third, we validated if moving a catheter in AI-indicated directions reached successful AF ablation sites in a hold-out set not used for training. Results: The validation cohort was 69.0±8.3 years’ and 72.6% had non-paroxysmal AF. In Fig. B, AF activation times by traditional electrogram features were noisy versus MAPs (arrows). Fig. B (bottom) shows AI-activation times on a multi-electrode array in a 67Y woman in persistent AF, showing predominantly up/left activity over time. The array was moved accordingly and analysis repeated (steps 1-4 in fig. A, top), until the AF termination site was reached. coPilot pointed to 85.7% of AF termination versus 13.1% of control sites (p<0.01, fig. C). coPilot also reached sites ablated in cases of long-term success (68.8% at 1Y). Time to the successful region was 4.2±1.1 movements (estimated <5 minutes) that was shorter than atrial mapping time (>10-15 minutes). Conclusions: A novel AI-based system trained to physiological and clinical gold standards can rapidly steer a clinical catheter during AF to successful ablation sites. This approach has promise for improving the success of AF ablation while reducing case time over existing strategies.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Washington University in St. Louis (US), ETH Zurich (CH), Cascade Technologies (United States) (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Silicon Valley University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.