Abstract 4361408: Amyloid Pathway Markers and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Amyloid beta 1–40 (Aβ1–40), a cleavage product of amyloid precursor protein, is emerging as a vascular inflammation marker with prognostic value in cardiovascular disease (CVD). Its predictive utility, however, remains inconsistent across clinical settings. BACE1-AS, a regulatory long non-coding RNA of Aβ1–40, has also been implicated in adverse cardiovascular outcomes. We aimed to synthesize available evidence and quantify the prognostic strength of these markers across CVD populations. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar using predefined PICO criteria. Filters: human studies, English language, adults (≥18), observational cohorts or clinical trials. Outcomes of interest included mortality, heart failure, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Risk of bias was assessed via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled hazard ratios were calculated using the generic inverse variance method. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess heterogeneity. Results: Four studies (n = 7,154). Pooled hazard ratio for all-cause mortality: HR = 1.19 (95% CI: 1.04–1.36; p = 0.01). Heterogeneity was high (I 2 = 94%). One-out sensitivity analysis identified Aleksova et al. as the primary driver; excluding it reduced I 2 to 59%. This study uniquely combined STEMI and NSTEMI patients in a high-risk cohort with longer follow-up, enriched for older age, renal dysfunction, and systolic failure—conditions known to amplify Aβ1–40 levels. Another study reported a 32% increased heart failure risk per 1-SD rise in Aβ1–40. Elevated BACE1-AS tertiles predicted a 1.86-fold increase in MACE risk. Conclusion: Aβ1–40 is a significant prognostic biomarker for mortality and heart failure in CVD populations. The heterogeneity across studies is largely explained by the Aleksova et al. study, which captured a more acute, high-risk phenotype with STEMI dominance and systemic inflammation. Its removal in sensitivity analysis reveals more consistent effect sizes across stable cohorts. These results reinforce the pathobiological relevance of the amyloid axis in cardiovascular disease and call for standardized measurement protocols and phenotype-stratified validation. Aβ1–40 and BACE1-AS should be investigated further as tools for early risk stratification in precision cardiology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4361408
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4361408: Amyloid Pathway Markers and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Salar Haider, Saman Javid, Durga prasad Gutta, Tushar Subhadarshan Mishra et al.
Circulation
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
article

Abstract 4361408: Amyloid Pathway Markers and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Salar Haider, Saman Javid, Durga prasad Gutta, Tushar Subhadarshan Mishra, Gaurav Sharma, Nidhi Lanka
article en

Abstract

Background: Amyloid beta 1–40 (Aβ1–40), a cleavage product of amyloid precursor protein, is emerging as a vascular inflammation marker with prognostic value in cardiovascular disease (CVD). Its predictive utility, however, remains inconsistent across clinical settings. BACE1-AS, a regulatory long non-coding RNA of Aβ1–40, has also been implicated in adverse cardiovascular outcomes. We aimed to synthesize available evidence and quantify the prognostic strength of these markers across CVD populations. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar using predefined PICO criteria. Filters: human studies, English language, adults (≥18), observational cohorts or clinical trials. Outcomes of interest included mortality, heart failure, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Risk of bias was assessed via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled hazard ratios were calculated using the generic inverse variance method. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess heterogeneity. Results: Four studies (n = 7,154). Pooled hazard ratio for all-cause mortality: HR = 1.19 (95% CI: 1.04–1.36; p = 0.01). Heterogeneity was high (I 2 = 94%). One-out sensitivity analysis identified Aleksova et al. as the primary driver; excluding it reduced I 2 to 59%. This study uniquely combined STEMI and NSTEMI patients in a high-risk cohort with longer follow-up, enriched for older age, renal dysfunction, and systolic failure—conditions known to amplify Aβ1–40 levels. Another study reported a 32% increased heart failure risk per 1-SD rise in Aβ1–40. Elevated BACE1-AS tertiles predicted a 1.86-fold increase in MACE risk. Conclusion: Aβ1–40 is a significant prognostic biomarker for mortality and heart failure in CVD populations. The heterogeneity across studies is largely explained by the Aleksova et al. study, which captured a more acute, high-risk phenotype with STEMI dominance and systemic inflammation. Its removal in sensitivity analysis reveals more consistent effect sizes across stable cohorts. These results reinforce the pathobiological relevance of the amyloid axis in cardiovascular disease and call for standardized measurement protocols and phenotype-stratified validation. Aβ1–40 and BACE1-AS should be investigated further as tools for early risk stratification in precision cardiology.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Siddhartha Medical College (IN), King Edward Medical University (PK), NIMS University (IN), Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital and Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College (IN), Combined Military Hospital (PK), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Sri Siddhartha Medical College (IN), Jaipur National University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.