Abstract 4361427: Serial changes in post-heart transplant ejection fraction predict recipient mortality

Background: Heart transplantation (HTx) is the gold standard therapy for refractory class IV NYHA heart failure. While it has been widely observed that donor ejection fraction (EF) at the time of procurement has little to no significant impact on recipient survival, particularly when ischemic time is less than 4-hours, there are few studies which investigate the role of post-transplant EF. Namely, it has not been fully established how serial changes in follow-up EF impact HTx outcomes. Research question: Do serial changes in post-transplant EF impact HTx recipient survival, and if so, which pattern of change has the highest risk of mortality? Goals: Our study seeks to evaluate the role of post-transplant EF changes and its impact on HTx recipient survival. By addressing this gap in knowledge, clinicians may better identify and treat hazardous EF trajectories earlier in their course. Methods: The UNOS thoracic database was analyzed for first-time, isolated orthotopic HTx patients (≥18yrs) between 2000-2023. The absolute difference between EF values at 1- (EF1) and 2-years (EF2) post-HTx was analyzed; patients with missing data in EF1 or EF2 were excluded. Recipients were stratified into 5 groups: severe reduction in EF: <-10% points (n=1403), mild reduction in EF: -5.1 to -10% (n=2381), stable EF: -5 to +5% (n=19194), mild increase in EF: +5.1 to +10% (n=2414), and substantial increase in EF: >+10% (n=1314). Survival was assessed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and Cox regression modelling. Results: In total, 26706 patients were included in this study. Kaplan-Meier curves are displayed in Figure 1, with median survival estimates for each EF group as follows: severe reduction (10.6yrs), mild reduction (14.3yrs), stable (14.4yrs), mild increase (14.5yrs), and substantial increase (14.2yrs). There was a significant difference in survival based on log-rank test (p<0.001). Cox regression modelling found the following mortality risk results with reference to a stable EF: severe EF reduction (HR=1.88, p<0.001), mild EF reduction (HR=1.11, p=0.035), mild EF increase (HR=1.04, p=0.426), and substantial EF increase (HR=1.24, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our investigation found a significant increase in mortality risk for HTx recipients who develop a reduction or substantial increase in EF. Special attention and care should be given to such recipients – particularly those who are observed to have a drop in their EF of >10%, as their risk for mortality may increase by 88%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4361427
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4361427: Serial changes in post-heart transplant ejection fraction predict recipient mortality

Ahad Firoz, Shirin Jimenez
Circulation
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4361427: Serial changes in post-heart transplant ejection fraction predict recipient mortality

Ahad Firoz, Shirin Jimenez
article en

Abstract

Background: Heart transplantation (HTx) is the gold standard therapy for refractory class IV NYHA heart failure. While it has been widely observed that donor ejection fraction (EF) at the time of procurement has little to no significant impact on recipient survival, particularly when ischemic time is less than 4-hours, there are few studies which investigate the role of post-transplant EF. Namely, it has not been fully established how serial changes in follow-up EF impact HTx outcomes. Research question: Do serial changes in post-transplant EF impact HTx recipient survival, and if so, which pattern of change has the highest risk of mortality? Goals: Our study seeks to evaluate the role of post-transplant EF changes and its impact on HTx recipient survival. By addressing this gap in knowledge, clinicians may better identify and treat hazardous EF trajectories earlier in their course. Methods: The UNOS thoracic database was analyzed for first-time, isolated orthotopic HTx patients (≥18yrs) between 2000-2023. The absolute difference between EF values at 1- (EF1) and 2-years (EF2) post-HTx was analyzed; patients with missing data in EF1 or EF2 were excluded. Recipients were stratified into 5 groups: severe reduction in EF: <-10% points (n=1403), mild reduction in EF: -5.1 to -10% (n=2381), stable EF: -5 to +5% (n=19194), mild increase in EF: +5.1 to +10% (n=2414), and substantial increase in EF: >+10% (n=1314). Survival was assessed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and Cox regression modelling. Results: In total, 26706 patients were included in this study. Kaplan-Meier curves are displayed in Figure 1, with median survival estimates for each EF group as follows: severe reduction (10.6yrs), mild reduction (14.3yrs), stable (14.4yrs), mild increase (14.5yrs), and substantial increase (14.2yrs). There was a significant difference in survival based on log-rank test (p<0.001). Cox regression modelling found the following mortality risk results with reference to a stable EF: severe EF reduction (HR=1.88, p<0.001), mild EF reduction (HR=1.11, p=0.035), mild EF increase (HR=1.04, p=0.426), and substantial EF increase (HR=1.24, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our investigation found a significant increase in mortality risk for HTx recipients who develop a reduction or substantial increase in EF. Special attention and care should be given to such recipients – particularly those who are observed to have a drop in their EF of >10%, as their risk for mortality may increase by 88%.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.