Abstract 4361466: Association Between Antiphospholipid Antibody and Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Emerging evidence suggests that antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) may be associated with an increased cardiovascular risk beyond the thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Among patients with ischemic stroke, the clinical significance of single positive aPL remains ill-defined. We aimed to assess the prevalence of aPL seropositivity in patients with stroke and the association between aPL seropositivity and stroke risk. Methods: This analysis is part of a larger project with PROSPERO ID CRD420251047305. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and Embase on 5/13/2025 to identify cohort or case-control studies of unselected adult patients (without APS) investigating the association between aPL seropositivity and acute ischemic stroke compared with non-stroke controls. Positivity for aPL was defined as a single positive measurement for lupus anticoagulant in clot-based assays, IgM/IgG anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibody, or IgM/IgG anticardiolipin antibody at the time of stroke. Random-effects models with inverse weights were utilized to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Among 3,241 unique records, 43 studies (39 case-control and 4 cohort studies) were included representing a total of 6,374 patients (mean age 59.0 years, 51.1% men). The pooled prevalence of aPL seropositivity among patients with ischemic stroke was 18.1% (95% CI 17.2%-19.0%) (Figure, Panel A). Patients with ischemic stroke, compared with non-stroke controls, had a higher odds for seropositivity for aPL (OR: 2.94, 95% CI 2.31-3.74, I 2 =69%) (Figure, Panel B). In sensitivity analysis following removal of outlier studies, similar findings were demonstrated with overall improvement in model heterogeneity (OR: 2.58, 95% CI, 2.21-3.02, I 2 =20%). Conclusion: In this analysis, seropositivity for aPL were present in nearly one in five patients with ischemic stroke, significantly more than in the general population, and were associated with an increased odds of stroke. Whether seropositivity for aPL at a single time point is a causal risk factor for stroke warrants further investigation in future prospective studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4361466
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4361466: Association Between Antiphospholipid Antibody and Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mehrdad Zarghami, Harlan Krumholz, Sina Rashedi, Syed Bukhari et al.
1 citations
Circulation
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
1.67
article

Abstract 4361466: Association Between Antiphospholipid Antibody and Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mehrdad Zarghami, Harlan Krumholz, Sina Rashedi, Syed Bukhari, Samuel Zachary Goldhaber, Mitchell S.V. Elkind, Mary Cushman, Behnood Bikdeli, Nathan Watson, Eric A. Secemsky, Christopher B. Anderson, Brittany Weber, Jean M. Connors, Jeffrey Ian Weitz, Mariana Pfeferman, Karen H. Costenbader, Geoffrey Barnes, Gregory Piazza, Francisco Ujueta, Yogen Kanthi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Emerging evidence suggests that antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) may be associated with an increased cardiovascular risk beyond the thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Among patients with ischemic stroke, the clinical significance of single positive aPL remains ill-defined. We aimed to assess the prevalence of aPL seropositivity in patients with stroke and the association between aPL seropositivity and stroke risk. Methods: This analysis is part of a larger project with PROSPERO ID CRD420251047305. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and Embase on 5/13/2025 to identify cohort or case-control studies of unselected adult patients (without APS) investigating the association between aPL seropositivity and acute ischemic stroke compared with non-stroke controls. Positivity for aPL was defined as a single positive measurement for lupus anticoagulant in clot-based assays, IgM/IgG anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibody, or IgM/IgG anticardiolipin antibody at the time of stroke. Random-effects models with inverse weights were utilized to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Among 3,241 unique records, 43 studies (39 case-control and 4 cohort studies) were included representing a total of 6,374 patients (mean age 59.0 years, 51.1% men). The pooled prevalence of aPL seropositivity among patients with ischemic stroke was 18.1% (95% CI 17.2%-19.0%) (Figure, Panel A). Patients with ischemic stroke, compared with non-stroke controls, had a higher odds for seropositivity for aPL (OR: 2.94, 95% CI 2.31-3.74, I 2 =69%) (Figure, Panel B). In sensitivity analysis following removal of outlier studies, similar findings were demonstrated with overall improvement in model heterogeneity (OR: 2.58, 95% CI, 2.21-3.02, I 2 =20%). Conclusion: In this analysis, seropositivity for aPL were present in nearly one in five patients with ischemic stroke, significantly more than in the general population, and were associated with an increased odds of stroke. Whether seropositivity for aPL at a single time point is a causal risk factor for stroke warrants further investigation in future prospective studies.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Vermont (US), American Heart Association (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), National Institutes of Health (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Michigan (US), Yale University (US), Michigan United (US), Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute (CA), Mass General Brigham (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.