Abstract 4344908: Financial Burden in Cancer Survivors with Cardiovascular Comorbidities: A Nationwide Evaluation of U.S. Healthcare Expenditures and Utilization (2016–2022)

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in cancer survivors, yet its cumulative economic impact remains underexplored in nationally representative populations. As both cancer survivorship and CVD prevalence rise, quantifying this dual burden is essential to inform resource allocation, optimize care, and guide policy interventions. Hypothesis: We evaluated healthcare expenditures and utilization among U.S. cancer survivors with and without CVD using nationally representative data. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of the 2016–2022 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Household Component (MEPS-HC), including adults aged ≥18 years with diagnosis of cancer. Cardiovascular comorbidities including ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and stroke were identified using ICD-10 codes. Annual healthcare expenditures and utilization (inpatient nights, hospital discharges, emergency room visits, office-based visits, and prescriptions) were compared between cancer survivors with and without CVD. Multivariable generalized linear models (gamma family with log link), negative binomial, and zero-inflated negative binomial regressions, adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical confounders. Results: Annually, an estimated 1.19 million cancer survivors with CVD incurred 41.2% higher adjusted annual healthcare expenditures than those without CVD (marginal increase: $10,096; 95% CI: $4,394–$15,798; p=0.001). Stroke imposed the highest financial burden (+123%; +$30,518/year), followed by heart failure (+73%; +$19,000) and atrial fibrillation (+46%; +$12,393), while myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease did not yield significant cost differences (p=0.088). Cardio-oncology patients had greater utilization: 33% more office visits (Median 14 vs 10/year; p=0.003), prescriptions (+58%), ER visits (+70%; p=0.001), and hospital discharges (+0.18/year; p=0.002). Financial hardship was linked to a 15% increase in total cost (p=0.001), regional differences accounted for 8% of expenditure variation, while Medicare coverage reduced costs up to 36% (p<0.01). Conclusion: Cancer survivors with CVD face significantly higher healthcare costs and utilization, particularly in the context of stroke and heart failure. These findings underscore the need for integrated cardio-oncology care and targeted policy intervention to mitigate financial toxicity and improve outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4344908
Primary Topic
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4344908: Financial Burden in Cancer Survivors with Cardiovascular Comorbidities: A Nationwide Evaluation of U.S. Healthcare Expenditures and Utilization (2016–2022)

Harshith Thyagaturu, Ranjana Ramesh, Brijesh Patel, Harshkumar Patel et al.
Circulation
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
article

Abstract 4344908: Financial Burden in Cancer Survivors with Cardiovascular Comorbidities: A Nationwide Evaluation of U.S. Healthcare Expenditures and Utilization (2016–2022)

Harshith Thyagaturu, Ranjana Ramesh, Brijesh Patel, Harshkumar Patel, Pranathi Tella, Zulkifl Jafary, N. Ramesh, Ramya Elangovan
article en

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in cancer survivors, yet its cumulative economic impact remains underexplored in nationally representative populations. As both cancer survivorship and CVD prevalence rise, quantifying this dual burden is essential to inform resource allocation, optimize care, and guide policy interventions. Hypothesis: We evaluated healthcare expenditures and utilization among U.S. cancer survivors with and without CVD using nationally representative data. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of the 2016–2022 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Household Component (MEPS-HC), including adults aged ≥18 years with diagnosis of cancer. Cardiovascular comorbidities including ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and stroke were identified using ICD-10 codes. Annual healthcare expenditures and utilization (inpatient nights, hospital discharges, emergency room visits, office-based visits, and prescriptions) were compared between cancer survivors with and without CVD. Multivariable generalized linear models (gamma family with log link), negative binomial, and zero-inflated negative binomial regressions, adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical confounders. Results: Annually, an estimated 1.19 million cancer survivors with CVD incurred 41.2% higher adjusted annual healthcare expenditures than those without CVD (marginal increase: $10,096; 95% CI: $4,394–$15,798; p=0.001). Stroke imposed the highest financial burden (+123%; +$30,518/year), followed by heart failure (+73%; +$19,000) and atrial fibrillation (+46%; +$12,393), while myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease did not yield significant cost differences (p=0.088). Cardio-oncology patients had greater utilization: 33% more office visits (Median 14 vs 10/year; p=0.003), prescriptions (+58%), ER visits (+70%; p=0.001), and hospital discharges (+0.18/year; p=0.002). Financial hardship was linked to a 15% increase in total cost (p=0.001), regional differences accounted for 8% of expenditure variation, while Medicare coverage reduced costs up to 36% (p<0.01). Conclusion: Cancer survivors with CVD face significantly higher healthcare costs and utilization, particularly in the context of stroke and heart failure. These findings underscore the need for integrated cardio-oncology care and targeted policy intervention to mitigate financial toxicity and improve outcomes.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
West Virginia University (US), Government Medical College (IN), Brown University (US), West Virginia University Hospitals (US), Aims Community College (US), Medical Research Foundation (GB), Indiana University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.