Abstract 4359177: In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Is Associated With Higher Mortality Than Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Patients With Cardiac Arrest Treated With eCPR

Background: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) is increasingly being used for cardiac arrest refractory to conventional resuscitation. While data suggests the benefit of eCPR in select populations, there are scarce outcomes data for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) compared to those with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Research Question: Do outcomes of eCPR differ between IHCA and OHCA? Methods: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2022, we analyzed in-hospital outcomes of adult patients who underwent eCPR for IHCA vs. OHCA using multivariable logistic regression and propensity score methods. The study cohort was identified using ICD-10 diagnostic and procedural codes. Results: Of 4,365 patients treated with eCPR for cardiac arrest, 3,252 (74.5%) had OHCA and 1,113 (25.5%) had IHCA. During the study period, the proportion of patients with OHCA receiving eCPR significantly increased (p-trend<0.001). Patients with IHCA were older (54 vs. 53 years), more often female (37.8% vs. 33.1%) with a higher comorbidity burden, and less likely to have shockable rhythm. In-hospital mortality was higher in patients with IHCA compared to OHCA (66.5% vs. 56.4%, p<0.001). The length of hospital stay was longer, and the cost of hospitalization was higher for patients with IHCA vs. OHCA. After adjustment for comorbidities, IHCA was associated with higher mortality based on regression (odds ratio [OR], 1.56; 95% CI [confidence interval], 1.23-1.98) and propensity score-matched (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.25-2.10) analyses. IHCA was associated with less major bleeding (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.98) and less anoxic brain injury (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.95) but higher risk of sepsis (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.29-2.10). Conclusion: In patients with cardiac arrest treated with eCPR, IHCA was associated with increased in-hospital mortality compared to OHCA. These findings suggest a need for further studies to guide patient selection in clinical practice for eCPR in IHCA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4359177
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4359177: In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Is Associated With Higher Mortality Than Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Patients With Cardiac Arrest Treated With eCPR

Andrea Elliott, Ganesh Raveendran, Roshan Modi, Sergey Gurevich et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract 4359177: In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Is Associated With Higher Mortality Than Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Patients With Cardiac Arrest Treated With eCPR

Andrea Elliott, Ganesh Raveendran, Roshan Modi, Sergey Gurevich, Ilhwan Yeo, Jason A. Bartos, Alejandra Gutiérrez, Demetris Yannopoulos
article en

Abstract

Background: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) is increasingly being used for cardiac arrest refractory to conventional resuscitation. While data suggests the benefit of eCPR in select populations, there are scarce outcomes data for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) compared to those with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Research Question: Do outcomes of eCPR differ between IHCA and OHCA? Methods: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2022, we analyzed in-hospital outcomes of adult patients who underwent eCPR for IHCA vs. OHCA using multivariable logistic regression and propensity score methods. The study cohort was identified using ICD-10 diagnostic and procedural codes. Results: Of 4,365 patients treated with eCPR for cardiac arrest, 3,252 (74.5%) had OHCA and 1,113 (25.5%) had IHCA. During the study period, the proportion of patients with OHCA receiving eCPR significantly increased (p-trend<0.001). Patients with IHCA were older (54 vs. 53 years), more often female (37.8% vs. 33.1%) with a higher comorbidity burden, and less likely to have shockable rhythm. In-hospital mortality was higher in patients with IHCA compared to OHCA (66.5% vs. 56.4%, p<0.001). The length of hospital stay was longer, and the cost of hospitalization was higher for patients with IHCA vs. OHCA. After adjustment for comorbidities, IHCA was associated with higher mortality based on regression (odds ratio [OR], 1.56; 95% CI [confidence interval], 1.23-1.98) and propensity score-matched (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.25-2.10) analyses. IHCA was associated with less major bleeding (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.98) and less anoxic brain injury (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.95) but higher risk of sepsis (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.29-2.10). Conclusion: In patients with cardiac arrest treated with eCPR, IHCA was associated with increased in-hospital mortality compared to OHCA. These findings suggest a need for further studies to guide patient selection in clinical practice for eCPR in IHCA.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Cornell University (US), University of Minnesota System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.