Abstract Sat805: Six Month Follow-up after Community Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training with Traditional and Breasted Manikins

Introduction: Prior research has shown that females are less likely to receive CPR in an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Yet, many community CPR trainings do not use breasted manikins. We assessed 3 domains of community participants’ perceptions of performing bystander CPR: comfort, confidence, and willingness, 6 months after they completed a training with traditional and breasted manikins. Methods: In a crossover pilot study, participants were consented during a CPR training event for teachers at an urban public school. They were randomized to initial training using a traditional or breasted manikin. Participants then switched manikins and re-practiced CPR. An in-person survey was obtained post-training. Six months later, participants were emailed another survey to reassess their technical knowledge, comfort, confidence, and willingness to perform CPR in an emergent situation. Chi square and fisher’s exact tests were used to assess bivariate associations. Results: Of 114 total study participants, 79 participants (69%) completed the 6-month follow-up survey. Using a Likert scale (1-5, 1 being least comfortable and 5 being most comfortable), 61% reported a 5 (feeling very comfortable) and 30% a 4 (feeling fairly comfortable) performing CPR using traditional manikins while 22% reported a 5 and 60% a 4 using breasted manikins, showing reduced comfort for breasted manikins. There was also more neutrality or only somewhat comfort reported with breasted vs traditional manikins (17% vs 9%, respectively). 77% of participants reported that training on both the traditional manikin and the female-breasted manikin impacted their confidence in performing CPR. 81% of participants reported that training on a breasted manikin increased their comfort level for doing CPR on a real-life female in OHCA. 42% of participants reported a 5 (being very willing) and 49% a 4 (being fairly willing) to perform CPR irrespective of gender in a real-life OHCA. Conclusion: Our pilot study with a 6-month follow-up highlights a reduced comfort level in performing CPR using breasted vs traditional manikins. Yet, majority of participants reported increased comfort performing CPR in a real-life OHCA with a female after practicing on a breasted manikin Overall, there is high willingness to perform CPR on both male and female victims.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.sat805
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sat805: Six Month Follow-up after Community Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training with Traditional and Breasted Manikins

Pavitra Kotini‐Shah, Ahana Gupta, David A. Kellner, Shaveta Khosla et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract Sat805: Six Month Follow-up after Community Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training with Traditional and Breasted Manikins

Pavitra Kotini‐Shah, Ahana Gupta, David A. Kellner, Shaveta Khosla, Elizabeth Froelich, Courtney Schwerin O'Reilly
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Prior research has shown that females are less likely to receive CPR in an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Yet, many community CPR trainings do not use breasted manikins. We assessed 3 domains of community participants’ perceptions of performing bystander CPR: comfort, confidence, and willingness, 6 months after they completed a training with traditional and breasted manikins. Methods: In a crossover pilot study, participants were consented during a CPR training event for teachers at an urban public school. They were randomized to initial training using a traditional or breasted manikin. Participants then switched manikins and re-practiced CPR. An in-person survey was obtained post-training. Six months later, participants were emailed another survey to reassess their technical knowledge, comfort, confidence, and willingness to perform CPR in an emergent situation. Chi square and fisher’s exact tests were used to assess bivariate associations. Results: Of 114 total study participants, 79 participants (69%) completed the 6-month follow-up survey. Using a Likert scale (1-5, 1 being least comfortable and 5 being most comfortable), 61% reported a 5 (feeling very comfortable) and 30% a 4 (feeling fairly comfortable) performing CPR using traditional manikins while 22% reported a 5 and 60% a 4 using breasted manikins, showing reduced comfort for breasted manikins. There was also more neutrality or only somewhat comfort reported with breasted vs traditional manikins (17% vs 9%, respectively). 77% of participants reported that training on both the traditional manikin and the female-breasted manikin impacted their confidence in performing CPR. 81% of participants reported that training on a breasted manikin increased their comfort level for doing CPR on a real-life female in OHCA. 42% of participants reported a 5 (being very willing) and 49% a 4 (being fairly willing) to perform CPR irrespective of gender in a real-life OHCA. Conclusion: Our pilot study with a 6-month follow-up highlights a reduced comfort level in performing CPR using breasted vs traditional manikins. Yet, majority of participants reported increased comfort performing CPR in a real-life OHCA with a female after practicing on a breasted manikin Overall, there is high willingness to perform CPR on both male and female victims.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.