Abstract 4367620: One Size Doesn't Fit All: Age-Stratified Analysis of Digital Health Readiness and Patient Portal Use in US Adults with Cardiovascular Disease from 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey

Background: Patient portals can support cardiovascular disease (CVD) management, but disparities in digital health readiness, especially among older adults, may limit their use. Understanding age-specific digital health readiness gaps is key to promoting equitable engagement. Research Questions: How is digital health readiness associated with patient portal use among US adults with CVD, and how do these associations vary by age group (18–64 vs. ≥65)? Methods: Cross-sectional analysis was done using the 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey 7 among those with self-reported CVD (heart attack, angina, or congestive heart failure) and internet access (used internet on any device). Digital health readiness domains include: 1) digital access (internet satisfaction, smartphone, computer use), 2) digital usage (can use tech alone, social media use), 3) digital literacy (search skills), 4) digital health literacy (looking up health info, messaging providers, app and wearable use), and 5) learnability (tech frustration). The outcome was self-reported patient portal use in the past year (Yes/No). Education was identified as a covariate based on bivariate analysis. Weighted logistic regressions were stratified by age, controlling for education. Results: A total of 644 adults (weighted N, 20.7 million) were included (mean(SD) age: 60(21) years; 66% ≥65 years, and 73% Non-Hispanic White adults). Overall, 70% reported using patient portals in the past year (75% of adults aged 18-64 and 66% of adults aged ≥65). In adults aged 18–64, patient portal use was associated with ability to use tech alone (Adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 5.5, 95%CI: 2.0–15.2), looking up health info (AOR 4.3, 95%CI: 1.1–16.9), messaging providers (AOR 14.6, 95%CI: 4.3–49.4), and health app use (AOR 3.9, 95%CI: 1.1–13.2). For adults aged ≥65 years, patient portal use was associated with computer use (AOR 4.9, 95%CI: 2.3–10.6), satisfaction with internet (AOR 4.7, 95%CI: 1.5–14.6), looking up health info (AOR 4.7, 95%CI: 1.7–11.0), messaging providers (AOR 7.6, 95%CI: 3.0–19.4), and health app use (AOR 3.1, 95%CI: 1.0–9.2). Conclusions: Digital health readiness was associated with patient portal use, but relevant domains differ by age. Adults 18-64 years may benefit from enhancing tech independence and communication features, while adults ≥65 years may require improved access and digital health literacy support. Age-specific interventions are needed to bridge the digital divide in CVD management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367620
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367620: One Size Doesn't Fit All: Age-Stratified Analysis of Digital Health Readiness and Patient Portal Use in US Adults with Cardiovascular Disease from 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey

Soo Hyun Kim, Chitchanok Benjasirisan, Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb, Arum Lim et al.
Circulation
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Abstract 4367620: One Size Doesn't Fit All: Age-Stratified Analysis of Digital Health Readiness and Patient Portal Use in US Adults with Cardiovascular Disease from 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey

Soo Hyun Kim, Chitchanok Benjasirisan, Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb, Arum Lim, Binu Koirala, Yuling Chen
article en

Abstract

Background: Patient portals can support cardiovascular disease (CVD) management, but disparities in digital health readiness, especially among older adults, may limit their use. Understanding age-specific digital health readiness gaps is key to promoting equitable engagement. Research Questions: How is digital health readiness associated with patient portal use among US adults with CVD, and how do these associations vary by age group (18–64 vs. ≥65)? Methods: Cross-sectional analysis was done using the 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey 7 among those with self-reported CVD (heart attack, angina, or congestive heart failure) and internet access (used internet on any device). Digital health readiness domains include: 1) digital access (internet satisfaction, smartphone, computer use), 2) digital usage (can use tech alone, social media use), 3) digital literacy (search skills), 4) digital health literacy (looking up health info, messaging providers, app and wearable use), and 5) learnability (tech frustration). The outcome was self-reported patient portal use in the past year (Yes/No). Education was identified as a covariate based on bivariate analysis. Weighted logistic regressions were stratified by age, controlling for education. Results: A total of 644 adults (weighted N, 20.7 million) were included (mean(SD) age: 60(21) years; 66% ≥65 years, and 73% Non-Hispanic White adults). Overall, 70% reported using patient portals in the past year (75% of adults aged 18-64 and 66% of adults aged ≥65). In adults aged 18–64, patient portal use was associated with ability to use tech alone (Adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 5.5, 95%CI: 2.0–15.2), looking up health info (AOR 4.3, 95%CI: 1.1–16.9), messaging providers (AOR 14.6, 95%CI: 4.3–49.4), and health app use (AOR 3.9, 95%CI: 1.1–13.2). For adults aged ≥65 years, patient portal use was associated with computer use (AOR 4.9, 95%CI: 2.3–10.6), satisfaction with internet (AOR 4.7, 95%CI: 1.5–14.6), looking up health info (AOR 4.7, 95%CI: 1.7–11.0), messaging providers (AOR 7.6, 95%CI: 3.0–19.4), and health app use (AOR 3.1, 95%CI: 1.0–9.2). Conclusions: Digital health readiness was associated with patient portal use, but relevant domains differ by age. Adults 18-64 years may benefit from enhancing tech independence and communication features, while adults ≥65 years may require improved access and digital health literacy support. Age-specific interventions are needed to bridge the digital divide in CVD management.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.