Abstract 4365487: A Novel Classification of Heart Failure Derived from the Nationwide JROADHF Cohort Using Unsupervised Machine Learning

Introduction/Background: Heart failure (HF) care is still steered almost solely by left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), yet outcomes remain sub-optimal, suggesting that the HFrEF/HFmrEF/HFpEF scheme is too crude for precision therapy. Research Question/Hypothesis: We hypothesised that unsupervised machine learning (ML) applied to routinely collected variables could yield a more informative HF stratification than the conventional LVEF-based framework. Goals/Aims: To develop an ML-derived multidimensional HF classification, test its prognostic performance, and compare it with existing LVEF categories. Methods/Approach: We analysed 13,238 patients in the nationwide JROAD-HF registry in Japan. Forty-six clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic variables entered a latent-class model; the cohort was randomly split 1:1 into discovery and internal-validation sets to assess robustness. (Figure 1) Clinical endpoint defined as a composite of 5-year cardiovascular death and heart failure readmission. Results: The model identified three phenogroups by minimum Bayesian Information Criteria. Phenogroup 1 “Advanced Low-Output HF” (predominantly male, age 73.6 ± 12 years) showed severe systolic dysfunction (LVEF 35.5 %), renal impairment, and heavy burdens of ischemic heart disease (52 %) and cardiomyopathy (29%). Phenogroup 2 “Early Afterload-Mismatch HF” (predominantly male, age 68.8 ± 12 years) was the youngest, markedly hypertensive, with intermediate LVEF (41.9%) and diverse etiologies. Phenogroup 3 “Elderly HFpEF-like HF” (predominantly female, age 84.5 ± 7 years) was lean and anemic, with preserved LVEF 53.5%, atrial fibrillation (45%), and valvular disease (42%). The four most discriminative variables were age, total bilirubin, LV diastolic diameter, and serum hemoglobin rather than LVEF and yielded an adjusted Rand index of 0.94 in the validation set, indicating excellent reproducibility. Five-year Kaplan–Meier curves showed the lowest mortality in Phenogroup 2 and the highest in Phenogroup 1 (log-rank p < 0.001), whereas LVEF categories showed no significant separation (p = 0.267) (Figure 2 A and B). Conclusions: ML-driven phenomapping of routine hospital data delineated three distinct HF groups that outperformed the traditional LVEF classification in prognostic discrimination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4365487
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4365487: A Novel Classification of Heart Failure Derived from the Nationwide JROADHF Cohort Using Unsupervised Machine Learning

Tomomi Ide, Nobuyuki Enzan, Takeshi Tohyama, Yasuki Nakada et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4365487: A Novel Classification of Heart Failure Derived from the Nationwide JROADHF Cohort Using Unsupervised Machine Learning

Tomomi Ide, Nobuyuki Enzan, Takeshi Tohyama, Yasuki Nakada, Shungo Hikoso, Tomoya Ueda, Shouji Matsushima, Atsushi Kyodo, Kazutaka Nogi, Satomi Ishihara, Hiroyuki Tsutsui
article en

Abstract

Introduction/Background: Heart failure (HF) care is still steered almost solely by left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), yet outcomes remain sub-optimal, suggesting that the HFrEF/HFmrEF/HFpEF scheme is too crude for precision therapy. Research Question/Hypothesis: We hypothesised that unsupervised machine learning (ML) applied to routinely collected variables could yield a more informative HF stratification than the conventional LVEF-based framework. Goals/Aims: To develop an ML-derived multidimensional HF classification, test its prognostic performance, and compare it with existing LVEF categories. Methods/Approach: We analysed 13,238 patients in the nationwide JROAD-HF registry in Japan. Forty-six clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic variables entered a latent-class model; the cohort was randomly split 1:1 into discovery and internal-validation sets to assess robustness. (Figure 1) Clinical endpoint defined as a composite of 5-year cardiovascular death and heart failure readmission. Results: The model identified three phenogroups by minimum Bayesian Information Criteria. Phenogroup 1 “Advanced Low-Output HF” (predominantly male, age 73.6 ± 12 years) showed severe systolic dysfunction (LVEF 35.5 %), renal impairment, and heavy burdens of ischemic heart disease (52 %) and cardiomyopathy (29%). Phenogroup 2 “Early Afterload-Mismatch HF” (predominantly male, age 68.8 ± 12 years) was the youngest, markedly hypertensive, with intermediate LVEF (41.9%) and diverse etiologies. Phenogroup 3 “Elderly HFpEF-like HF” (predominantly female, age 84.5 ± 7 years) was lean and anemic, with preserved LVEF 53.5%, atrial fibrillation (45%), and valvular disease (42%). The four most discriminative variables were age, total bilirubin, LV diastolic diameter, and serum hemoglobin rather than LVEF and yielded an adjusted Rand index of 0.94 in the validation set, indicating excellent reproducibility. Five-year Kaplan–Meier curves showed the lowest mortality in Phenogroup 2 and the highest in Phenogroup 1 (log-rank p < 0.001), whereas LVEF categories showed no significant separation (p = 0.267) (Figure 2 A and B). Conclusions: ML-driven phenomapping of routine hospital data delineated three distinct HF groups that outperformed the traditional LVEF classification in prognostic discrimination.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Broad Institute (US), Kyushu University (JP), Kyushu University Hospital (JP), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Nara Medical University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.