Abstract 4343294: Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Improves Mortality and Heart Failure Outcomes Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing in Atrioventricular Block: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an emerging physiologic pacing strategy that may offer advantages over conventional right ventricular pacing (RVP) in patients with atrioventricular (AV) block. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the comparative safety and efficacy of LBBAP versus RVP. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were systematically searched to identify studies comparing LBBAP and RVP in patients with AV block. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Outcomes included paced QRS duration, all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVDD), and periprocedural complications. Results: The meta-analysis examined nine studies (6 observational and three randomized controlled trials). The analysis of pacing parameters demonstrated significantly reduced paced QRS duration with LBBAP compared to RVP (MD [95% CI]: -35.91 [-40.68, -31.15], p-value < 0.00001), and primary outcomes revealed a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR [95% CI]: 0.49 [0.34, 0.72], p-value: 0.0002), and heart failure hospitalization associated with LBBAP (RR [95% CI]: 0.35 [0.23, 0.53], p-value: < 0.00001). Secondary outcomes, including periprocedural complications and changes in LVEF and LVDD exhibited non-significant increases in complications (RR [95% CI]: 1.14 [0.66, 1.95], p-value: < 0.64) and significant improvements in LVEF (MD [95% CI]: 3.35 [0.29, 6.35], p-value: 0.03). At the same time, LVDD showed a non-significant decrease (MD [95% CI]: -2.28 [-4.94, 0.37], p-value: 0.09). Conclusion: LBBAP demonstrates superior clinical outcomes compared to RVP in patients with AV block, including reduced mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and improved LVEF and paced QRS duration. Larger randomized trials are warranted to confirm these findings and guide clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4343294
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4343294: Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Improves Mortality and Heart Failure Outcomes Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing in Atrioventricular Block: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Janish Kothari, Sohny Kotak, Mahima Khatri
Circulation
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Abstract 4343294: Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Improves Mortality and Heart Failure Outcomes Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing in Atrioventricular Block: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Janish Kothari, Sohny Kotak, Mahima Khatri
article en

Abstract

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an emerging physiologic pacing strategy that may offer advantages over conventional right ventricular pacing (RVP) in patients with atrioventricular (AV) block. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the comparative safety and efficacy of LBBAP versus RVP. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were systematically searched to identify studies comparing LBBAP and RVP in patients with AV block. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Outcomes included paced QRS duration, all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVDD), and periprocedural complications. Results: The meta-analysis examined nine studies (6 observational and three randomized controlled trials). The analysis of pacing parameters demonstrated significantly reduced paced QRS duration with LBBAP compared to RVP (MD [95% CI]: -35.91 [-40.68, -31.15], p-value < 0.00001), and primary outcomes revealed a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR [95% CI]: 0.49 [0.34, 0.72], p-value: 0.0002), and heart failure hospitalization associated with LBBAP (RR [95% CI]: 0.35 [0.23, 0.53], p-value: < 0.00001). Secondary outcomes, including periprocedural complications and changes in LVEF and LVDD exhibited non-significant increases in complications (RR [95% CI]: 1.14 [0.66, 1.95], p-value: < 0.64) and significant improvements in LVEF (MD [95% CI]: 3.35 [0.29, 6.35], p-value: 0.03). At the same time, LVDD showed a non-significant decrease (MD [95% CI]: -2.28 [-4.94, 0.37], p-value: 0.09). Conclusion: LBBAP demonstrates superior clinical outcomes compared to RVP in patients with AV block, including reduced mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and improved LVEF and paced QRS duration. Larger randomized trials are warranted to confirm these findings and guide clinical practice.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Jersey City Medical Center (US), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.