Abstract 4368593: Black Patients Have Higher Odds of Discharge with Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

Background: The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) is a an external, patient-controlled device that offers lifesaving protection against sudden cardiac death in patients with contraindications to immediate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement. Racial disparities in cardiovascular care are well documented, with Black patients undergoing invasive procedures at lower rates than White patients, despite similar or higher disease burdens. These disparities may partly reflect patient preferences, as studies show that Black patients have greater aversion to invasive treatments. We therefore hypothesized that Black patients would have a higher utilization of WCD therapy compared to White patients. Methods: We analyzed discharge encounters from the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2020) for patients with clinical indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement who did not receive the device during hospitalization. Survey-weighted logistic regression estimated odds of WCD discharge. Results: Among 3,298,524 patients eligible for WCD at discharge, 71% were White and 16% were Black. Only 0.26% of these were discharged with WCD. In multi-variable analysis adjusting for demographics, co-morbidities, and hospital characteristics, Black patients remained 79% more likely to receive WCD (adjusted OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.59-2.01, p<0.001). Hispanic patients had 22% higher odds (OR 1.22, CI 1.04-1.43, p=0.01). Male gender, larger hospitals, and urban teaching centers were independently associated with increased WCD use. Adjusted predicted probabilities of WCD at discharge from 2016 to 2020 revealed that Black patients had the highest probability of getting WCD, with a steady increase over the 5-year period. Conclusions: A higher proportion of ICD-eligible Black patients received WCD compared to Whites. This supports our hypothesis and may be additional evidence that Black patients tend to prefer less invasive interventions. Given that WCD effectiveness is critically dependent on continuous adherence and that racial disparities in medical device adherence are well-documented, these patients may face excess risk of sudden cardiac death during the vulnerable period when relying on WCD protection. Further research should investigate targeted interventions to improve adherence and examine whether the preference for WCD over ICD compromises survival outcomes in Black patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4368593
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4368593: Black Patients Have Higher Odds of Discharge with Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

Bryce D. Beutler, Tokunbo David Gbadebo, Daniel Antwi Amoabeng, Samuel Governor et al.
Circulation
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Abstract 4368593: Black Patients Have Higher Odds of Discharge with Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

Bryce D. Beutler, Tokunbo David Gbadebo, Daniel Antwi Amoabeng, Samuel Governor, Ikpemosi Sado
article en

Abstract

Background: The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) is a an external, patient-controlled device that offers lifesaving protection against sudden cardiac death in patients with contraindications to immediate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement. Racial disparities in cardiovascular care are well documented, with Black patients undergoing invasive procedures at lower rates than White patients, despite similar or higher disease burdens. These disparities may partly reflect patient preferences, as studies show that Black patients have greater aversion to invasive treatments. We therefore hypothesized that Black patients would have a higher utilization of WCD therapy compared to White patients. Methods: We analyzed discharge encounters from the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2020) for patients with clinical indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement who did not receive the device during hospitalization. Survey-weighted logistic regression estimated odds of WCD discharge. Results: Among 3,298,524 patients eligible for WCD at discharge, 71% were White and 16% were Black. Only 0.26% of these were discharged with WCD. In multi-variable analysis adjusting for demographics, co-morbidities, and hospital characteristics, Black patients remained 79% more likely to receive WCD (adjusted OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.59-2.01, p<0.001). Hispanic patients had 22% higher odds (OR 1.22, CI 1.04-1.43, p=0.01). Male gender, larger hospitals, and urban teaching centers were independently associated with increased WCD use. Adjusted predicted probabilities of WCD at discharge from 2016 to 2020 revealed that Black patients had the highest probability of getting WCD, with a steady increase over the 5-year period. Conclusions: A higher proportion of ICD-eligible Black patients received WCD compared to Whites. This supports our hypothesis and may be additional evidence that Black patients tend to prefer less invasive interventions. Given that WCD effectiveness is critically dependent on continuous adherence and that racial disparities in medical device adherence are well-documented, these patients may face excess risk of sudden cardiac death during the vulnerable period when relying on WCD protection. Further research should investigate targeted interventions to improve adherence and examine whether the preference for WCD over ICD compromises survival outcomes in Black patients.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
McNeese State University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Heart Foundation (US), Decatur Memorial Hospital (US), Rockaway Waterfront Alliance (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.