Abstract 4370837: WE CHATT: A Pilot Study to Improve Physician-Youth Communication and Medical Decision-Making in Pediatric Advanced Heart Disease

Background: Despite increased survival rates for children with congenital heart disease (CHD), they still face high morbidity, mortality, and complex medical decision-making, particularly when living with advanced disease, such as heart failure. There are identified gaps in meeting the communication and medical decision-making needs of these young patients. Additionally, clinicians report many barriers and lack of training specific to communication about difficult topics, such as prognostication and advance care planning, with their young patients. Patient-centered communication tools are needed to address these gaps. Research Question: This single-center pilot study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the WE CHATT communication tool which was designed via mixed-methods research with adolescents/young adults (AYA; ages 12-24) with advanced heart disease and their caregivers. The 2-page tool facilitates discussions on medical communication preferences, medical decision-making preferences, and support needs between clinicians, AYAs, and caregivers. Methods: Participants included twenty pediatric cardiologists (N=13) / fellows (N=7) randomized to the intervention (N=10) or control (N=10) arms. The intervention included a 1-hour training and WE CHATT tool usage in an AYA new patient encounter. Physicians completed baseline and post-intervention surveys assessing comfort and barriers specific to AYA communication and medical decision making. The comfort scale ranged from 15-75 with higher scores indicating greater comfort. Feedback on the WE CHATT tool in practice was also gathered from AYAs (N=10) and caregivers (N=9) via surveys, including a 0-10 (10=highest) satisfaction scale. Results: Baseline comfort in discussing difficult topics with AYAs was M=52.1 (SD=14.2) in the control arm and M=54.1 (SD=9.3) in the intervention arm. Post-intervention, comfort increased to M=58.4 (SD=9.0) in the intervention arm, with a Cohen’s d small-medium effect size of 0.33. The median time spent using the WE CHATT tool was 15 minutes (IQR 15-25). Satisfaction scores were high, with median ratings of 9 from physicians, and 9 and 10 from AYAs and caregivers, respectively. Conclusion: Pediatric cardiologists face challenges in communicating with AYAs about their advanced heart disease. WE CHATT is a feasible, well-received tool that enhances physician comfort in engaging with young patients, effectively aligning with the communication needs of AYAs and their caregivers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370837
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370837: WE CHATT: A Pilot Study to Improve Physician-Youth Communication and Medical Decision-Making in Pediatric Advanced Heart Disease

Ray Lowery, Melissa K. Cousino, Sunkyung Yu, Kurt R. Schumacher et al.
Circulation
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
article

Abstract 4370837: WE CHATT: A Pilot Study to Improve Physician-Youth Communication and Medical Decision-Making in Pediatric Advanced Heart Disease

Ray Lowery, Melissa K. Cousino, Sunkyung Yu, Kurt R. Schumacher, Carolyn Vitale, Cynthia C. Smith
article en

Abstract

Background: Despite increased survival rates for children with congenital heart disease (CHD), they still face high morbidity, mortality, and complex medical decision-making, particularly when living with advanced disease, such as heart failure. There are identified gaps in meeting the communication and medical decision-making needs of these young patients. Additionally, clinicians report many barriers and lack of training specific to communication about difficult topics, such as prognostication and advance care planning, with their young patients. Patient-centered communication tools are needed to address these gaps. Research Question: This single-center pilot study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the WE CHATT communication tool which was designed via mixed-methods research with adolescents/young adults (AYA; ages 12-24) with advanced heart disease and their caregivers. The 2-page tool facilitates discussions on medical communication preferences, medical decision-making preferences, and support needs between clinicians, AYAs, and caregivers. Methods: Participants included twenty pediatric cardiologists (N=13) / fellows (N=7) randomized to the intervention (N=10) or control (N=10) arms. The intervention included a 1-hour training and WE CHATT tool usage in an AYA new patient encounter. Physicians completed baseline and post-intervention surveys assessing comfort and barriers specific to AYA communication and medical decision making. The comfort scale ranged from 15-75 with higher scores indicating greater comfort. Feedback on the WE CHATT tool in practice was also gathered from AYAs (N=10) and caregivers (N=9) via surveys, including a 0-10 (10=highest) satisfaction scale. Results: Baseline comfort in discussing difficult topics with AYAs was M=52.1 (SD=14.2) in the control arm and M=54.1 (SD=9.3) in the intervention arm. Post-intervention, comfort increased to M=58.4 (SD=9.0) in the intervention arm, with a Cohen’s d small-medium effect size of 0.33. The median time spent using the WE CHATT tool was 15 minutes (IQR 15-25). Satisfaction scores were high, with median ratings of 9 from physicians, and 9 and 10 from AYAs and caregivers, respectively. Conclusion: Pediatric cardiologists face challenges in communicating with AYAs about their advanced heart disease. WE CHATT is a feasible, well-received tool that enhances physician comfort in engaging with young patients, effectively aligning with the communication needs of AYAs and their caregivers.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Michigan (US), Michigan United (US), C. S. Mott Children's Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.