Abstract 4368589: Impact of Single-Pill Combination Therapy on Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping in Indian Patients: A Subanalysis from the TOPSPIN Trial

Background: Non-dipping and reverse-dipping of nocturnal blood pressure (BP) are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Data on dipping status and its modulation by Single-Pill Combination (SPC) therapy in Indian or South Asian populations is sparse. Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence and predictors of nocturnal BP dipping patterns in Indian hypertensive patients and the efficacy of three SPCs on restoring dipping status. Methods: TOPSPIN was a multicenter, randomized, single-blind trial of 1981 Indian adults with hypertension, treated with three SPCs: amlodipine–perindopril, perindopril–indapamide, and amlodipine–indapamide. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed at baseline (n=1980) and 6 months (n=1624). Dipping was defined by percent nocturnal systolic BP fall: extreme dipper (≥20%), dipper (10 - 20%), non-dipper (<10%), and reverse dipper (no fall or a paradoxical rise). Logistic regression identified predictors of non-dipping. Results: Among the 1980 participants with baseline ABPM data, 53.1% were classified as non-dippers, including 15.8% with a reverse-dipping pattern. Compared to dippers, non-dippers were older (53.2 vs. 50.8 years, p<0.001), more likely to be female (46.2% vs. 37.4%, p<0.001), have diabetes (20.8% vs. 16.3%, p=0.010) and have lower eGFR (92.5 vs 96.1 ml/min, p<0.001). Non-dippers had significantly higher mean 24-hr ambulatory SBP, DBP, mean night-time SBP and DBP. Multivariable logistic regression showed that non-dipping was independently associated with age >55 years (OR 1.42; 95% CI: 1.17–1.72), female sex (OR 1.44; 95% CI: 1.19–1.74), diabetes (OR 1.40; 95% CI: 1.10–1.79), current smoking (OR 1.66; 95% CI:1.12–2.46), and serum sodium >140 mmol/L (OR 1.24; 95% CI: 1.02–1.52). For the patients (n = 1624) with complete baseline and 6-month ABPM data, the prevalence of non-dippers (non and reverse dippers) modestly declined from 53.1% to 49.5% (p=0.024). However, when stratified by treatment arm, the proportion of non-dippers at 6 months was 51.4% in the amlodipine–perindopril group, 47.8% in the perindopril–indapamide group, and 49.1% in the amlodipine–indapamide group with no significant between-group difference (p = 0.49). Conclusions: Non-dipping is highly prevalent among Indian hypertensive patients. Six months of SPC reduced overall BP but had a clinically minimal impact on restoring nocturnal dipping, with no significant differences across treatment arms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4368589
Primary Topic
Heart rate and cardiovascular health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4368589: Impact of Single-Pill Combination Therapy on Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping in Indian Patients: A Subanalysis from the TOPSPIN Trial

Vinod K. Abichandani, Amit Malviya, Dimple Kondal, Ambalam M. Chandrasekaran et al.
Circulation
Heart rate and cardiovascular health
article

Abstract 4368589: Impact of Single-Pill Combination Therapy on Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping in Indian Patients: A Subanalysis from the TOPSPIN Trial

Vinod K. Abichandani, Amit Malviya, Dimple Kondal, Ambalam M. Chandrasekaran, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, T Network Investigators, Gaia Kiru, Kavita Singh, Somnath Mukherjee, Kiran Aithal, Bhupinder Singh, Ambuj Roy, Mohsin Raj Mantoo, Aman Khanna, António Lobo, Edmin Christa Sobitharaj, Bishav Mohan, Balkishan Gupta, Neil Poulter, Hyndavi Salwa
article en

Abstract

Background: Non-dipping and reverse-dipping of nocturnal blood pressure (BP) are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Data on dipping status and its modulation by Single-Pill Combination (SPC) therapy in Indian or South Asian populations is sparse. Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence and predictors of nocturnal BP dipping patterns in Indian hypertensive patients and the efficacy of three SPCs on restoring dipping status. Methods: TOPSPIN was a multicenter, randomized, single-blind trial of 1981 Indian adults with hypertension, treated with three SPCs: amlodipine–perindopril, perindopril–indapamide, and amlodipine–indapamide. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed at baseline (n=1980) and 6 months (n=1624). Dipping was defined by percent nocturnal systolic BP fall: extreme dipper (≥20%), dipper (10 - 20%), non-dipper (<10%), and reverse dipper (no fall or a paradoxical rise). Logistic regression identified predictors of non-dipping. Results: Among the 1980 participants with baseline ABPM data, 53.1% were classified as non-dippers, including 15.8% with a reverse-dipping pattern. Compared to dippers, non-dippers were older (53.2 vs. 50.8 years, p<0.001), more likely to be female (46.2% vs. 37.4%, p<0.001), have diabetes (20.8% vs. 16.3%, p=0.010) and have lower eGFR (92.5 vs 96.1 ml/min, p<0.001). Non-dippers had significantly higher mean 24-hr ambulatory SBP, DBP, mean night-time SBP and DBP. Multivariable logistic regression showed that non-dipping was independently associated with age >55 years (OR 1.42; 95% CI: 1.17–1.72), female sex (OR 1.44; 95% CI: 1.19–1.74), diabetes (OR 1.40; 95% CI: 1.10–1.79), current smoking (OR 1.66; 95% CI:1.12–2.46), and serum sodium >140 mmol/L (OR 1.24; 95% CI: 1.02–1.52). For the patients (n = 1624) with complete baseline and 6-month ABPM data, the prevalence of non-dippers (non and reverse dippers) modestly declined from 53.1% to 49.5% (p=0.024). However, when stratified by treatment arm, the proportion of non-dippers at 6 months was 51.4% in the amlodipine–perindopril group, 47.8% in the perindopril–indapamide group, and 49.1% in the amlodipine–indapamide group with no significant between-group difference (p = 0.49). Conclusions: Non-dipping is highly prevalent among Indian hypertensive patients. Six months of SPC reduced overall BP but had a clinically minimal impact on restoring nocturnal dipping, with no significant differences across treatment arms.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Central University of Punjab (IN), North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (IN), Sardar Patel Medical College (IN), Ahmedabad Civil Hospital (IN), Rashtriya Raksha University (IN), Dayanand Medical College & Hospital (IN), Indian Institute of Information Technology Vadodara (IN), Centre for Chronic Disease Control (IN), SDM College of Medical Science and Hospital (IN), Imperial College London (GB), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Heart rate and cardiovascular health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.