Abstract 4368573: The Implication of Sex on Clinical Long-Term Outcomes After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Introduction: Previous research has found that women have higher mortality after cardiac surgery compared to men. However, research on the impact of sex on clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement is sparse. In addition, loss of life expectancy or net-survival measures should be used to adjust for the difference in general population life expectancy when examining sex differences. The aim of this study was to analyze clinical long-term outcomes in men versus women after surgical aortic valve replacement. Material and Methods: This observational, nationwide cohort study included all adult patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement between 1997 and 2022 in Sweden. Regression standardization was used to account for baseline differences. Flexible parametric survival models were used to estimate loss of life expectancy and net mortality, net mortality being a metric which can be interpreted as if the population under study could only die of the cause of interest. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and loss of life expectancy, and secondary outcomes were aortic valve reintervention and heart failure hospitalization. Results: In total, 38,342 patients (men: 25,253, women: 13,109) were included. The mean age was 68 years and 34% of the patients were women. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, male patients had a higher mortality than female patients (cumulative incidence difference at 15 years: 7.1%, 95% CI 6.1%–8.1%). The loss of life expectancy was higher in women, where the largest loss-in-life-expectancy was observed in 50-year old women operated year 2002 (12.1 years, 95% CI 10.1–14.1 years). There was a higher regression standardized cumulative incidence of net-mortality in men at 15 years compared to women (difference 2.3%, 95% CI: 0.4% to 4.1%). At 15 years, there was no difference in the cumulative incidence of reintervention (0.6%, 95% CI -0.2–1.4%) or heart failure hospitalization (-1.1%, 95% CI -2.2–0.1%) between men and women. Conclusions: Men had a higher long-term all-cause mortality after aortic valve replacement than women. However, women had a higher loss of life expectancy compared to men. The difference in loss of life expectancy between the sexes decreased during the study period. After multivariable adjustment, men had a higher net-mortality compared to women. No differences were found in reintervention or heart failure hospitalization between the sexes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4368573
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4368573: The Implication of Sex on Clinical Long-Term Outcomes After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Christian Reitan, Michael Dismorr, Anders Franco‐Cereceda, Ulrik Sartipy et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Abstract 4368573: The Implication of Sex on Clinical Long-Term Outcomes After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Christian Reitan, Michael Dismorr, Anders Franco‐Cereceda, Ulrik Sartipy, Natalie Glaser, Malin Granbom Koski
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Previous research has found that women have higher mortality after cardiac surgery compared to men. However, research on the impact of sex on clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement is sparse. In addition, loss of life expectancy or net-survival measures should be used to adjust for the difference in general population life expectancy when examining sex differences. The aim of this study was to analyze clinical long-term outcomes in men versus women after surgical aortic valve replacement. Material and Methods: This observational, nationwide cohort study included all adult patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement between 1997 and 2022 in Sweden. Regression standardization was used to account for baseline differences. Flexible parametric survival models were used to estimate loss of life expectancy and net mortality, net mortality being a metric which can be interpreted as if the population under study could only die of the cause of interest. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and loss of life expectancy, and secondary outcomes were aortic valve reintervention and heart failure hospitalization. Results: In total, 38,342 patients (men: 25,253, women: 13,109) were included. The mean age was 68 years and 34% of the patients were women. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, male patients had a higher mortality than female patients (cumulative incidence difference at 15 years: 7.1%, 95% CI 6.1%–8.1%). The loss of life expectancy was higher in women, where the largest loss-in-life-expectancy was observed in 50-year old women operated year 2002 (12.1 years, 95% CI 10.1–14.1 years). There was a higher regression standardized cumulative incidence of net-mortality in men at 15 years compared to women (difference 2.3%, 95% CI: 0.4% to 4.1%). At 15 years, there was no difference in the cumulative incidence of reintervention (0.6%, 95% CI -0.2–1.4%) or heart failure hospitalization (-1.1%, 95% CI -2.2–0.1%) between men and women. Conclusions: Men had a higher long-term all-cause mortality after aortic valve replacement than women. However, women had a higher loss of life expectancy compared to men. The difference in loss of life expectancy between the sexes decreased during the study period. After multivariable adjustment, men had a higher net-mortality compared to women. No differences were found in reintervention or heart failure hospitalization between the sexes.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.