Abstract 4367243: Comparative Effects of Tirzepatide vs Semaglutide on 1-Year Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in T2DM Patients with HFpEF

Background: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are at increased risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) such as Semaglutide, and dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and GLP-1 RAs such as Tirzepatide, have both demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in patients with T2DM and HFpEF. However, direct comparative data between Tirzepatide and Semaglutide in this high-risk population remain limited. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that among patients with T2DM and HFpEF, treatment with Tirzepatide would be associated with improved 1-year outcomes compared to semaglutide. Methods: Using the TriNetX network, we identified adults (≥18 years) with T2DM and HFpEF who were initiated on Tirzepatide or Semaglutide. The index date was defined by therapy initiation, and outcomes were assessed over 1 year of follow-up. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, heart failure exacerbation, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and atrial fibrillation/flutter. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed on demographics, body mass index, comorbidities, baseline HbA1c, and concurrent medications to balance the cohorts. The final matched sample consisted of 3,757 patients in each group. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values were reported for each outcome. Results: After matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced between the Tirzepatide and Semaglutide groups. At 1-year follow-up, Tirzepatide was associated with significantly lower odds of all-cause mortality (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48–0.91; p<0.01), all-cause hospitalization (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69–0.83; p<0.01), heart failure exacerbation (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61–0.84; p<0.01) and CVA (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66–0.99; p=0.04) compared with semaglutide. There was no significant difference in atrial fibrillation/flutter between the groups (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81–1.01; p=0.07) (Figure 1). Conclusion: In adults with T2DM and HFpEF, treatment with Tirzepatide was associated with better 1-year mortality and cardiovascular outcomes than semaglutide. These findings suggest that Tirzepatide may confer additional cardiovascular benefits over semaglutide in this high-risk population, warranting further investigation in prospective trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367243
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367243: Comparative Effects of Tirzepatide vs Semaglutide on 1-Year Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in T2DM Patients with HFpEF

Shiva Sah, Vishal Busa, Aravinthan Vignarajah, Nishanthi Vigneswaramoorthy
Circulation
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Abstract 4367243: Comparative Effects of Tirzepatide vs Semaglutide on 1-Year Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in T2DM Patients with HFpEF

Shiva Sah, Vishal Busa, Aravinthan Vignarajah, Nishanthi Vigneswaramoorthy
article en

Abstract

Background: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are at increased risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) such as Semaglutide, and dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and GLP-1 RAs such as Tirzepatide, have both demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in patients with T2DM and HFpEF. However, direct comparative data between Tirzepatide and Semaglutide in this high-risk population remain limited. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that among patients with T2DM and HFpEF, treatment with Tirzepatide would be associated with improved 1-year outcomes compared to semaglutide. Methods: Using the TriNetX network, we identified adults (≥18 years) with T2DM and HFpEF who were initiated on Tirzepatide or Semaglutide. The index date was defined by therapy initiation, and outcomes were assessed over 1 year of follow-up. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, heart failure exacerbation, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and atrial fibrillation/flutter. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed on demographics, body mass index, comorbidities, baseline HbA1c, and concurrent medications to balance the cohorts. The final matched sample consisted of 3,757 patients in each group. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values were reported for each outcome. Results: After matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced between the Tirzepatide and Semaglutide groups. At 1-year follow-up, Tirzepatide was associated with significantly lower odds of all-cause mortality (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48–0.91; p<0.01), all-cause hospitalization (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69–0.83; p<0.01), heart failure exacerbation (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61–0.84; p<0.01) and CVA (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66–0.99; p=0.04) compared with semaglutide. There was no significant difference in atrial fibrillation/flutter between the groups (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81–1.01; p=0.07) (Figure 1). Conclusion: In adults with T2DM and HFpEF, treatment with Tirzepatide was associated with better 1-year mortality and cardiovascular outcomes than semaglutide. These findings suggest that Tirzepatide may confer additional cardiovascular benefits over semaglutide in this high-risk population, warranting further investigation in prospective trials.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Cleveland Clinic (US), SUNY Upstate Medical University (US), Upstate University Hospital (US), Fairview Southdale Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.