Abstract 4346313: Unprocessed Red and Processed Meat and Alternative Protein Sources in Relation to Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: A Pooled Analysis of 1.7 million Participants

Background: The association between unprocessed red and processed meat intake and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) remains controversial, particularly for unprocessed red meat. Moreover, few studies have evaluated the health effects of replacing these meats with different protein sources. Methods: We examined associations between intakes of unprocessed red and processed (red and non-red) meat and CHD risk in a pooled analysis of 25 international prospective cohorts including 1,090,325 women and 673,694 men. Dietary intake was assessed at baseline within each cohort using a food frequency questionnaire. We calculated cohort- and sex-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using proportional hazards regression and pooled estimates using random-effects models. We further conducted isocaloric substitution analyses by comparing coefficients for unprocessed red and processed meat with those of alternative animal- and plant-based protein sources. Results: Over a maximum follow-up ranging from 7 to 30 years across cohorts, we documented 62,336 CHD death. After multivariable adjustment for body mass index, demographic, lifestyle, and medical factors, greater intakes of unprocessed red meat and processed meat were associated with a higher risk of fatal CHD, with stronger associations observed among women (p for heterogeneity due to sex <0.001). The HRs comparing extreme intake categories (≥125 vs. <10 g/d) of unprocessed red meat were 1.34 (95% CI: 1.15, 1.55; p for trend=0.003) for women and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.17; p for trend=0.009) for men. For processed meat, the corresponding HRs (comparing ≥50 vs. <2 g/d) were 1.39 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.59; p for trend<0.001) for women and 1.13 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.25; p for trend<0.001) for men. Isocaloric replacement of unprocessed red meat or processed meat with nuts and seeds was associated with a lower fatal CHD risk in both sexes. Additionally, in women, the replacement of processed meat with soy products, poultry, seafood, or dairy products, while the replacement of unprocessed red meat with soy products and dairy products was associated with a lower risk. Conclusions: These findings support global dietary recommendations to limit the intake of unprocessed red meat and processed meat for cardiovascular health, highlighting the benefits of replacing these meats with plant protein sources, particularly among women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4346313
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4346313: Unprocessed Red and Processed Meat and Alternative Protein Sources in Relation to Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: A Pooled Analysis of 1.7 million Participants

Stephanie A. Smith‐Warner, You Wu, Timothy J. Key, Laila Al‐Shaar et al.
Circulation
Nutritional Studies and Diet
article

Abstract 4346313: Unprocessed Red and Processed Meat and Alternative Protein Sources in Relation to Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: A Pooled Analysis of 1.7 million Participants

Stephanie A. Smith‐Warner, You Wu, Timothy J. Key, Laila Al‐Shaar, Walter Churchill Willett, Fenglei Wang, Tammy Y. N. Tong, Molin Wang
article en

Abstract

Background: The association between unprocessed red and processed meat intake and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) remains controversial, particularly for unprocessed red meat. Moreover, few studies have evaluated the health effects of replacing these meats with different protein sources. Methods: We examined associations between intakes of unprocessed red and processed (red and non-red) meat and CHD risk in a pooled analysis of 25 international prospective cohorts including 1,090,325 women and 673,694 men. Dietary intake was assessed at baseline within each cohort using a food frequency questionnaire. We calculated cohort- and sex-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using proportional hazards regression and pooled estimates using random-effects models. We further conducted isocaloric substitution analyses by comparing coefficients for unprocessed red and processed meat with those of alternative animal- and plant-based protein sources. Results: Over a maximum follow-up ranging from 7 to 30 years across cohorts, we documented 62,336 CHD death. After multivariable adjustment for body mass index, demographic, lifestyle, and medical factors, greater intakes of unprocessed red meat and processed meat were associated with a higher risk of fatal CHD, with stronger associations observed among women (p for heterogeneity due to sex <0.001). The HRs comparing extreme intake categories (≥125 vs. <10 g/d) of unprocessed red meat were 1.34 (95% CI: 1.15, 1.55; p for trend=0.003) for women and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.17; p for trend=0.009) for men. For processed meat, the corresponding HRs (comparing ≥50 vs. <2 g/d) were 1.39 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.59; p for trend<0.001) for women and 1.13 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.25; p for trend<0.001) for men. Isocaloric replacement of unprocessed red meat or processed meat with nuts and seeds was associated with a lower fatal CHD risk in both sexes. Additionally, in women, the replacement of processed meat with soy products, poultry, seafood, or dairy products, while the replacement of unprocessed red meat with soy products and dairy products was associated with a lower risk. Conclusions: These findings support global dietary recommendations to limit the intake of unprocessed red meat and processed meat for cardiovascular health, highlighting the benefits of replacing these meats with plant protein sources, particularly among women.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Harvard University (US), University of Oxford (GB), Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.