Role of root canal sealers and dentin surface pretreatment on pull-out strength of customized resilient ceramic posts-and-cores

This study evaluated the role of different root canal sealers and dentin conditioning protocols on Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network (PICN) post-and-core pull-out strength Eighty single-rooted endodontically treated teeth were divided into 2 main groups based on sealer type (resin-based or calcium silicate-based). Further, 4 subgroups were assigned based on different irrigation protocols: no conditioning (control; ), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 10% tannic acid, and 10% ascorbic acid. Milled PICN post-and-core specimens were air particle abraded and luted with self-adhesive resin cement. Pull-out strength was evaluated with a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was conducted using two-way ANOVA α ≤ 0.05. Dentin conditioning showed enhancement in pull-out strength of PICN post-and cores (P˂0.001). Different sealers showed different pull-out strengths in all groups, with the superiority of calcium silicate-based over resin-based sealers. The mean pull-out strength of conditioned dentin groups ranged from 166.20 ± 14.74 to 233.50 ± 16.55 N, the highest values associated with ascorbic acid and tannic acid, while EDTA groups were the lowest among conditioned dentin groups. All were significantly higher than the control: 132.00 ± 14.75 N for resin-based sealer and 141.60 ± 19.96 for silica-based sealer. Dentin surface conditioning enhances the pull-out strength of customized PICN post-and-core. Ascorbic and tannic acids with 10% concentrations are preferred over EDTA surface conditioning. Different sealers didn’t show a great difference in the pull-out strength; however, calcium silicate-based sealers exhibited superior results to resin-based sealers. It is crucial to understand the role of dentin conditioning in the retention of customizedPICN post-and-core. Although all non-eugenol sealers are preferred for adhesive root canalposts, silica-based sealers might be preferred to resin-based sealers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-07093-w
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of root canal sealers and dentin surface pretreatment on pull-out strength of customized resilient ceramic posts-and-cores

Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi, Samah Saker, Mohamed Ellayeh, Mohammed Ahmed Alghauli et al.
BMC Oral Health
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Role of root canal sealers and dentin surface pretreatment on pull-out strength of customized resilient ceramic posts-and-cores

Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi, Samah Saker, Mohamed Ellayeh, Mohammed Ahmed Alghauli, Marwa Saad Alzemei, Ahmed E. Farghal
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the role of different root canal sealers and dentin conditioning protocols on Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network (PICN) post-and-core pull-out strength Eighty single-rooted endodontically treated teeth were divided into 2 main groups based on sealer type (resin-based or calcium silicate-based). Further, 4 subgroups were assigned based on different irrigation protocols: no conditioning (control; ), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 10% tannic acid, and 10% ascorbic acid. Milled PICN post-and-core specimens were air particle abraded and luted with self-adhesive resin cement. Pull-out strength was evaluated with a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was conducted using two-way ANOVA α ≤ 0.05. Dentin conditioning showed enhancement in pull-out strength of PICN post-and cores (P˂0.001). Different sealers showed different pull-out strengths in all groups, with the superiority of calcium silicate-based over resin-based sealers. The mean pull-out strength of conditioned dentin groups ranged from 166.20 ± 14.74 to 233.50 ± 16.55 N, the highest values associated with ascorbic acid and tannic acid, while EDTA groups were the lowest among conditioned dentin groups. All were significantly higher than the control: 132.00 ± 14.75 N for resin-based sealer and 141.60 ± 19.96 for silica-based sealer. Dentin surface conditioning enhances the pull-out strength of customized PICN post-and-core. Ascorbic and tannic acids with 10% concentrations are preferred over EDTA surface conditioning. Different sealers didn’t show a great difference in the pull-out strength; however, calcium silicate-based sealers exhibited superior results to resin-based sealers. It is crucial to understand the role of dentin conditioning in the retention of customizedPICN post-and-core. Although all non-eugenol sealers are preferred for adhesive root canalposts, silica-based sealers might be preferred to resin-based sealers.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 25(1)
Mansoura University (EG), Taibah University (SA), Ibb University (YE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.