Abstract 4370864: Point-of-care Non-invasive Classification of Elevated Intracardiac Filling Pressures for Congestion Assessment

Background: Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) provides an objective assessment of congestion status in heart failure (HF) patients, but its use is limited by the need for an invasive procedure, trained personnel, and specialized equipment to obtain a measurement. Cardiosense (Chicago, IL) has developed a machine learning (ML) algorithm that detects elevated PCWP non-invasively from data acquired by a chest-worn wearable device (CardioTag). We present data for a potential in-clinic point-of-care tool that improves the identification of hemodynamic congestion, with a focus on outpatient and low-acuity settings. Methods: The ePCWP System is a ML model developed to identify elevated PCWP (>18 mmHg) using non-invasive physiological biosignals from the CardioTag device, which simultaneously collects electrocardiogram, seismocardiogram, and photoplethysmogram data. Concurrent CardioTag and right-heart catheterization (RHC) data were collected prospectively in an observational study across 15 US sites from 1,116 patients undergoing standard-of-care RHC. Patients were either diagnosed with HFrEF, HFpEF, HFmrEF, or were suspected of HF before the RHC procedure. Standard of care physical examination, used to evaluate congestion status, was captured and used for comparative analysis. The training dataset contained 726 subjects and the validation dataset contained 153 subjects. Results: Five-fold cross-validation of the training dataset showed an overall accuracy of 0.79, sensitivity of 0.75 (CI: [0.69, 0.80]), and a specificity of 0.81 (CI: [0.77, 0.78]). The validation dataset showed an overall accuracy of 0.81, sensitivity of 0.76 (CI: [0.63, 0.86]), and a specificity of 0.82 (CI: [0.66, 0.89]). Figure 1 shows the overall classification performance of the ePCWP System (left) and a comparison to standard-of-care physical exam (right). Conclusion: We developed a non-invasive point-of-care tool that is capable of providing rapid, accurate assessments of congestion for patients with HF. This tool might be used to support convenient, frequent inpatient monitoring to augment discharge decisions and guide post-discharge follow-up care towards timely interventions and improvements in patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370864
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370864: Point-of-care Non-invasive Classification of Elevated Intracardiac Filling Pressures for Congestion Assessment

Andrew M. Carek, Anjan Tibrewala, David Lin, Nihar Desai et al.
Circulation
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
article

Abstract 4370864: Point-of-care Non-invasive Classification of Elevated Intracardiac Filling Pressures for Congestion Assessment

Andrew M. Carek, Anjan Tibrewala, David Lin, Nihar Desai, Jaime Hernández-Montfort, Robert Gordon, Patrick J. McCann, Omer T. Inan, Marat Fudim, Liviu Klein
article en

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) provides an objective assessment of congestion status in heart failure (HF) patients, but its use is limited by the need for an invasive procedure, trained personnel, and specialized equipment to obtain a measurement. Cardiosense (Chicago, IL) has developed a machine learning (ML) algorithm that detects elevated PCWP non-invasively from data acquired by a chest-worn wearable device (CardioTag). We present data for a potential in-clinic point-of-care tool that improves the identification of hemodynamic congestion, with a focus on outpatient and low-acuity settings. Methods: The ePCWP System is a ML model developed to identify elevated PCWP (>18 mmHg) using non-invasive physiological biosignals from the CardioTag device, which simultaneously collects electrocardiogram, seismocardiogram, and photoplethysmogram data. Concurrent CardioTag and right-heart catheterization (RHC) data were collected prospectively in an observational study across 15 US sites from 1,116 patients undergoing standard-of-care RHC. Patients were either diagnosed with HFrEF, HFpEF, HFmrEF, or were suspected of HF before the RHC procedure. Standard of care physical examination, used to evaluate congestion status, was captured and used for comparative analysis. The training dataset contained 726 subjects and the validation dataset contained 153 subjects. Results: Five-fold cross-validation of the training dataset showed an overall accuracy of 0.79, sensitivity of 0.75 (CI: [0.69, 0.80]), and a specificity of 0.81 (CI: [0.77, 0.78]). The validation dataset showed an overall accuracy of 0.81, sensitivity of 0.76 (CI: [0.63, 0.86]), and a specificity of 0.82 (CI: [0.66, 0.89]). Figure 1 shows the overall classification performance of the ePCWP System (left) and a comparison to standard-of-care physical exam (right). Conclusion: We developed a non-invasive point-of-care tool that is capable of providing rapid, accurate assessments of congestion for patients with HF. This tool might be used to support convenient, frequent inpatient monitoring to augment discharge decisions and guide post-discharge follow-up care towards timely interventions and improvements in patient outcomes.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Northwestern University (US), South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (US), Prisma Health (US), Georgia Institute of Technology (US), NorthShore University HealthSystem (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Yale University (US), Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.