Abstract 4370885: Outcomes of Tirzepatide vs Semaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Background: Semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, has demonstrated benefit in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Tirzepatide, a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist with superior metabolic effects including weight loss, may provide additional advantages. Given limited head-to-head data, we evaluated clinical outcomes associated with Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and HFpEF. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted using TriNetX, a federated network of deidentified electronic health records from over 180 healthcare organizations. Adults with T2D and HFpEF (defined as left ventricular ejection fraction >40%) who initiated either Tirzepatide or Semaglutide between June 2022 and April 2024 were identified. After assessing baseline characteristics, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to balance cohorts. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter, hospitalizations, episodes of acute-on-chronic diastolic heart failure, and intravenous diuretic use. Results: Among 14,157 patients on Semaglutide and 2,222 on Tirzepatide, 2,222 matched pairs were analyzed. All-cause mortality occurred in 81 patients treated with Tirzepatide versus 108 in the Semaglutide group (3.7% vs. 4.9%; risk difference -1.2%; 95% CI, -2.4 to -0.0; p =0.046). There were no significant differences in new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter (3.3% vs. 3.4%; p =0.908), hospitalizations (3.1% vs. 3.0%; p =0.574), acute-on-chronic diastolic HF episodes (3.3% vs. 3.3%; p =0.944), or intravenous diuretic use (4.4% vs. 5.4%; p =0.116). Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of patients with T2D and HFpEF, Tirzepatide was associated with a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality compared to Semaglutide, without significant differences in other clinical outcomes. These findings support the potential cardiovascular benefit of Tirzepatide in this population and highlight the need for prospective studies to validate its long-term effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370885
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370885: Outcomes of Tirzepatide vs Semaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Syed Muzzammil Ahmad, Harshith Thyagaturu, Maan Awad, Saud Alawad et al.
Circulation
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Abstract 4370885: Outcomes of Tirzepatide vs Semaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Syed Muzzammil Ahmad, Harshith Thyagaturu, Maan Awad, Saud Alawad, Abdulrahman Murshid
article en

Abstract

Background: Semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, has demonstrated benefit in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Tirzepatide, a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist with superior metabolic effects including weight loss, may provide additional advantages. Given limited head-to-head data, we evaluated clinical outcomes associated with Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and HFpEF. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted using TriNetX, a federated network of deidentified electronic health records from over 180 healthcare organizations. Adults with T2D and HFpEF (defined as left ventricular ejection fraction >40%) who initiated either Tirzepatide or Semaglutide between June 2022 and April 2024 were identified. After assessing baseline characteristics, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to balance cohorts. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter, hospitalizations, episodes of acute-on-chronic diastolic heart failure, and intravenous diuretic use. Results: Among 14,157 patients on Semaglutide and 2,222 on Tirzepatide, 2,222 matched pairs were analyzed. All-cause mortality occurred in 81 patients treated with Tirzepatide versus 108 in the Semaglutide group (3.7% vs. 4.9%; risk difference -1.2%; 95% CI, -2.4 to -0.0; p =0.046). There were no significant differences in new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter (3.3% vs. 3.4%; p =0.908), hospitalizations (3.1% vs. 3.0%; p =0.574), acute-on-chronic diastolic HF episodes (3.3% vs. 3.3%; p =0.944), or intravenous diuretic use (4.4% vs. 5.4%; p =0.116). Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of patients with T2D and HFpEF, Tirzepatide was associated with a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality compared to Semaglutide, without significant differences in other clinical outcomes. These findings support the potential cardiovascular benefit of Tirzepatide in this population and highlight the need for prospective studies to validate its long-term effects.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
West Virginia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.