Abstract 4367206: Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes With Metoprolol vs Carvedilol in Women With Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Background: Beta-adrenergic blockers are commonly prescribed in the management of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) during the postpartum period. However, real-world data directly comparing the long-term clinical outcomes of metoprolol versus carvedilol in this population remains limited. Methods: Using the TriNetX network, we identified women diagnosed with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) after delivery. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on beta-blocker therapy received within 6 months after the diagnosis of PPCM: those treated with metoprolol and those treated with carvedilol. Individuals with a history of heart failure before pregnancy were excluded. Clinical outcomes, including all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, heart failure hospitalization, and proportions of patients with LVEF ≥50%, were evaluated at 1-year and 5-year follow-up intervals. Cohorts were propensity score-matched based on medical comorbidities and medications received. Results: Among 1,438 eligible patients, propensity score matching yielded two balanced cohorts of 517 patients each: one treated with metoprolol (mean age 31.5 ± 6.9 years; 41.6% Black; 35.6% White) and the other with carvedilol (mean age 31.5 ± 6.1 years; 41.2% Black; 37.3% White). At 1-year follow-up, the metoprolol group had a significantly lower risk of heart failure hospitalization compared to the carvedilol group (22.4% vs. 28.8%; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59–0.95; p = 0.02). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in all-cause mortality (1.9% vs. 1.9%; HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.62–4.68; p = 0.30), all-cause hospitalization (55.1% vs. 55.1%; HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.85–1.18; p = 0.99), or proportions of patients with LVEF ≥50% (9.1% vs. 7.9%; HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.78–1.81; p = 0.42). Similar trends were observed at the 5-year follow-up. Conclusion: Among women with PPCM, metoprolol use was associated with a lower risk of heart failure hospitalization compared to carvedilol at both 1-year and 5-year follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367206
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367206: Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes With Metoprolol vs Carvedilol in Women With Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Melinda B. Davis, Kamala Tamirisa, Yong Hao Yeo, Helen Wong et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
article

Abstract 4367206: Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes With Metoprolol vs Carvedilol in Women With Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Melinda B. Davis, Kamala Tamirisa, Yong Hao Yeo, Helen Wong, Tze Ern Ong, Aravinthan Vignarajah
article en

Abstract

Background: Beta-adrenergic blockers are commonly prescribed in the management of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) during the postpartum period. However, real-world data directly comparing the long-term clinical outcomes of metoprolol versus carvedilol in this population remains limited. Methods: Using the TriNetX network, we identified women diagnosed with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) after delivery. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on beta-blocker therapy received within 6 months after the diagnosis of PPCM: those treated with metoprolol and those treated with carvedilol. Individuals with a history of heart failure before pregnancy were excluded. Clinical outcomes, including all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, heart failure hospitalization, and proportions of patients with LVEF ≥50%, were evaluated at 1-year and 5-year follow-up intervals. Cohorts were propensity score-matched based on medical comorbidities and medications received. Results: Among 1,438 eligible patients, propensity score matching yielded two balanced cohorts of 517 patients each: one treated with metoprolol (mean age 31.5 ± 6.9 years; 41.6% Black; 35.6% White) and the other with carvedilol (mean age 31.5 ± 6.1 years; 41.2% Black; 37.3% White). At 1-year follow-up, the metoprolol group had a significantly lower risk of heart failure hospitalization compared to the carvedilol group (22.4% vs. 28.8%; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59–0.95; p = 0.02). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in all-cause mortality (1.9% vs. 1.9%; HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.62–4.68; p = 0.30), all-cause hospitalization (55.1% vs. 55.1%; HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.85–1.18; p = 0.99), or proportions of patients with LVEF ≥50% (9.1% vs. 7.9%; HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.78–1.81; p = 0.42). Similar trends were observed at the 5-year follow-up. Conclusion: Among women with PPCM, metoprolol use was associated with a lower risk of heart failure hospitalization compared to carvedilol at both 1-year and 5-year follow-up.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Universiti of Malaysia Sabah (MY), University of Michigan (US), Interfaith Medical Center (US), Newcastle University Medicine Malaysia (MY), Michigan United (US), Fairview Southdale Hospital (US), Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak (US), Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.