Abstract 4370887: Post-COVID-19 Patterns of Telehealth Utilization by Cardiovascular Risk Profile in the United States

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a lasting increase in telehealth use in the U.S., with 37% of adults reporting use in 2021. This shift has implications for managing cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs), which are prevalent and contribute to growing healthcare burdens. In this population-based study, we examined the association between a composite measure of CRF control and telehealth use, as well as demographic differences and reported reasons for telehealth use by CRF status. Methods: We analyzed data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey, including adults aged 18+ without prior cardiovascular disease and with complete CRF and telehealth data. A composite CRF score (range 0–7) calculated using the presence of seven risk factors: hypertension, diabetes, smoking, obesity, heavy alcohol use, insufficient physical activity, and sleep. CRF profiles classified as Poor (≥3 risk factors), Average (1–2), or Optimal (0). Weighted logistic regression models estimated the association between CRF status and (1) any telehealth use in the past 12 months, (2) mode and reasons for use among users. Results: Adults with poor CRF profiles had greater odds of using telehealth than those with optimal profiles (AOR=1.22; 95%CI: 1.03–1.44). Telehealth use was also more likely among females (AOR=1.57; 95%CI: 1.28–1.94), college graduates (AOR=1.91; 95%CI: 1.04–3.48), and insured individuals (AOR=2.52; 95%CI: 1.59–4.00). Those in the Midwest were less likely to use telehealth than Northeastern residents (AOR=0.49; 95%CI: 0.36–0.68). Use increased with CRF burden: 35.7% (optimal), 38.3% (average), and 41.3% (poor). Among users, video visits were more common in those with optimal CRF (74.3% vs. 70.1%) than poor CRF. Minor illness (31.5%) and annual checkups (22.3%) were the most cited reasons among adults with optimal CRF, while chronic illness management (31.7%) was more common in those with poor CRF. Among adults with optimal CRF, education (AOR=2.12; 95%CI: 1.04–4.30) and insurance (AOR=3.18; 95%CI: 1.46–6.90) were strong predictors of use. Females with moderate or poor CRF profiles had higher odds of using telehealth than their male counterparts (AOR=1.65; 95%CI: 1.30–2.09). Conclusion: Telehealth use is more common among individuals with poor cardiovascular profiles, particularly for chronic condition management, while those with optimal profiles more often used it for preventive care—highlighting telehealth's evolving role in chronic disease management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370887
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370887: Post-COVID-19 Patterns of Telehealth Utilization by Cardiovascular Risk Profile in the United States

Tarang Parekh, Ericka Johnson
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4370887: Post-COVID-19 Patterns of Telehealth Utilization by Cardiovascular Risk Profile in the United States

Tarang Parekh, Ericka Johnson
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a lasting increase in telehealth use in the U.S., with 37% of adults reporting use in 2021. This shift has implications for managing cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs), which are prevalent and contribute to growing healthcare burdens. In this population-based study, we examined the association between a composite measure of CRF control and telehealth use, as well as demographic differences and reported reasons for telehealth use by CRF status. Methods: We analyzed data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey, including adults aged 18+ without prior cardiovascular disease and with complete CRF and telehealth data. A composite CRF score (range 0–7) calculated using the presence of seven risk factors: hypertension, diabetes, smoking, obesity, heavy alcohol use, insufficient physical activity, and sleep. CRF profiles classified as Poor (≥3 risk factors), Average (1–2), or Optimal (0). Weighted logistic regression models estimated the association between CRF status and (1) any telehealth use in the past 12 months, (2) mode and reasons for use among users. Results: Adults with poor CRF profiles had greater odds of using telehealth than those with optimal profiles (AOR=1.22; 95%CI: 1.03–1.44). Telehealth use was also more likely among females (AOR=1.57; 95%CI: 1.28–1.94), college graduates (AOR=1.91; 95%CI: 1.04–3.48), and insured individuals (AOR=2.52; 95%CI: 1.59–4.00). Those in the Midwest were less likely to use telehealth than Northeastern residents (AOR=0.49; 95%CI: 0.36–0.68). Use increased with CRF burden: 35.7% (optimal), 38.3% (average), and 41.3% (poor). Among users, video visits were more common in those with optimal CRF (74.3% vs. 70.1%) than poor CRF. Minor illness (31.5%) and annual checkups (22.3%) were the most cited reasons among adults with optimal CRF, while chronic illness management (31.7%) was more common in those with poor CRF. Among adults with optimal CRF, education (AOR=2.12; 95%CI: 1.04–4.30) and insurance (AOR=3.18; 95%CI: 1.46–6.90) were strong predictors of use. Females with moderate or poor CRF profiles had higher odds of using telehealth than their male counterparts (AOR=1.65; 95%CI: 1.30–2.09). Conclusion: Telehealth use is more common among individuals with poor cardiovascular profiles, particularly for chronic condition management, while those with optimal profiles more often used it for preventive care—highlighting telehealth's evolving role in chronic disease management.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Delaware (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.