Abstract 4369025: Impact of New Heart Transplant Centers on Regional Transplant Volume and Outcomes

Introduction: Heart transplantation (HT) is a critical therapy for patients with end stage heart failure. HT volumes have increased since 2010, but the demand for this therapy continues to surpass the supply of donor organs. Although initiation of new transplant centers may increase access to HT, their impact on regional transplant volume and subsequent clinical outcomes remain unclear. Research Question: What is the impact of starting a new or reactivating a closed HT center on regional transplant volume and patient outcomes of waitlist time, waitlist mortality, and 1-year post-transplant mortality? Methods: Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), which includes data on all transplant candidates and recipients in the United States, were analyzed. New centers and re-opened centers (defined as 2 years of no transplants before restarting) from 2010 to 2023 were included. We used multivariable-adjusted Poisson mixed effects, competing risk, and Cox models to assess associations between center activity and volume, waitlist outcomes, and post-transplant mortality. Results: Seventeen new centers launched and five re-opened from 2010-2023, representing all 11 OPTN regions. In a majority of new center openings, total regional transplant volume increased without decrease in existing center volume (Figure 1). Addition of a new center did not significantly increase regional transplant volume or decrease waitlist time in the year after initiation. Reactivated centers were associated with an increased chance of receiving a transplant (HR 1.20, 95% CI [1.11, 1.28]) and lower waitlist mortality (HR 0.88, 95% CI [0.81, 0.86]). New centers were associated with higher waitlist mortality (HR 1.03, 95% CI [1.01, 1.05]), although a higher percentage of these patients had been in ICU prior to transplant. There was no difference in 1-year post-transplant mortality with either new or re-opened centers. Conclusions: Regional volume of transplants was higher following initiation of a new or reactivation of a closed HT center but this increase was not statistically significant after controlling for important variables. Similar post-transplant outcomes were observed, allaying concerns that center addition might negatively impact outcomes. Notably, re-opened centers were associated with improvement in wait time and waitlist mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4369025
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4369025: Impact of New Heart Transplant Centers on Regional Transplant Volume and Outcomes

Pablo Quintero, Andrew S. Oseran, Rishi K. Wadhera, Alvaro Delgado et al.
Circulation
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4369025: Impact of New Heart Transplant Centers on Regional Transplant Volume and Outcomes

Pablo Quintero, Andrew S. Oseran, Rishi K. Wadhera, Alvaro Delgado, A.R. Garan, Masashi Kai, Amy Xian Zhang, Yusuke Tsukioka, Laura K. Aguilar, L. Fleming, Marwa Sabe, Cara Guardino, Patrick M Hyland, L Goncalves, Jennifer Ho, Edward Wilson Grandin, Jenica Upshaw, Cancan Zhang
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Heart transplantation (HT) is a critical therapy for patients with end stage heart failure. HT volumes have increased since 2010, but the demand for this therapy continues to surpass the supply of donor organs. Although initiation of new transplant centers may increase access to HT, their impact on regional transplant volume and subsequent clinical outcomes remain unclear. Research Question: What is the impact of starting a new or reactivating a closed HT center on regional transplant volume and patient outcomes of waitlist time, waitlist mortality, and 1-year post-transplant mortality? Methods: Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), which includes data on all transplant candidates and recipients in the United States, were analyzed. New centers and re-opened centers (defined as 2 years of no transplants before restarting) from 2010 to 2023 were included. We used multivariable-adjusted Poisson mixed effects, competing risk, and Cox models to assess associations between center activity and volume, waitlist outcomes, and post-transplant mortality. Results: Seventeen new centers launched and five re-opened from 2010-2023, representing all 11 OPTN regions. In a majority of new center openings, total regional transplant volume increased without decrease in existing center volume (Figure 1). Addition of a new center did not significantly increase regional transplant volume or decrease waitlist time in the year after initiation. Reactivated centers were associated with an increased chance of receiving a transplant (HR 1.20, 95% CI [1.11, 1.28]) and lower waitlist mortality (HR 0.88, 95% CI [0.81, 0.86]). New centers were associated with higher waitlist mortality (HR 1.03, 95% CI [1.01, 1.05]), although a higher percentage of these patients had been in ICU prior to transplant. There was no difference in 1-year post-transplant mortality with either new or re-opened centers. Conclusions: Regional volume of transplants was higher following initiation of a new or reactivation of a closed HT center but this increase was not statistically significant after controlling for important variables. Similar post-transplant outcomes were observed, allaying concerns that center addition might negatively impact outcomes. Notably, re-opened centers were associated with improvement in wait time and waitlist mortality.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.