Abstract 4371345: Contemporary Use Of Parenteral Prostacyclin Administration In Pulmonary Artery Hypertension

Background: Group 1 pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) is treated with three main drug classes: prostacyclin analogs (PCAs), endothelin receptor antagonists, and nitric oxide pathway drugs. PCAs may be administered via parenteral (intravenous (IV), subcutaneous (SQ)) or oral/inhaled routes. The role of parenteral versus non-parenteral PCAs in contemporary PH practice remains unclear. Objectives: To compare contemporary hemodynamic and survival outcomes between parenteral and non-parenteral PCA use. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with WHO Group 1 PAH, who underwent a right heart catheterization (RHC) at Mayo Clinic. Diagnosis required mPAP was ≥25 mm Hg, documented chart diagnosis and initiation of PAH therapy. Echocardiographic and repeat RHC parameters were collected and only patients started on PCA therapy were included. Patients were grouped based on intiiated PCA route: parenteral (IV/SQ) vs non-parenteral routes (oral/inhaled). Hemodynamic changes (post-pretreatment) were compared using t-tests and ANOVA for parenteral vs non-parenteral PCA. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Of 144 patients initiated on PCA after the first RHC, 89 (62%) received parenteral and 55 (38%) non-parenteral PCA.. At baseline, patients who started on parenteral PCA had more severe disease with higher mean PAP, RAP and PVR. On follow-up, parenteral PCAs led to greater reductions in mean PAP and RAP, with no differences in PVR, TPR, or CO changes. Survival was worse with parenteral PCA use even after adjusting for comorbidities and baseline hemodynamics (HR 1.93; 95% CI 1.17-3.18; p=0.009). Discussion: Parenteral PCAs were more often used in patients with more severe pulmonary vascular disease. Despite greater hemodynamic improvements, parenteral PCAs were associated with worse survival, likely due to more severe disease at baseline. Further research is needed to understand the role of PCA route in guiding treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4371345
Primary Topic
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4371345: Contemporary Use Of Parenteral Prostacyclin Administration In Pulmonary Artery Hypertension

Revati Varma, Yogesh Reddy
Circulation
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
article

Abstract 4371345: Contemporary Use Of Parenteral Prostacyclin Administration In Pulmonary Artery Hypertension

Revati Varma, Yogesh Reddy
article en

Abstract

Background: Group 1 pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) is treated with three main drug classes: prostacyclin analogs (PCAs), endothelin receptor antagonists, and nitric oxide pathway drugs. PCAs may be administered via parenteral (intravenous (IV), subcutaneous (SQ)) or oral/inhaled routes. The role of parenteral versus non-parenteral PCAs in contemporary PH practice remains unclear. Objectives: To compare contemporary hemodynamic and survival outcomes between parenteral and non-parenteral PCA use. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with WHO Group 1 PAH, who underwent a right heart catheterization (RHC) at Mayo Clinic. Diagnosis required mPAP was ≥25 mm Hg, documented chart diagnosis and initiation of PAH therapy. Echocardiographic and repeat RHC parameters were collected and only patients started on PCA therapy were included. Patients were grouped based on intiiated PCA route: parenteral (IV/SQ) vs non-parenteral routes (oral/inhaled). Hemodynamic changes (post-pretreatment) were compared using t-tests and ANOVA for parenteral vs non-parenteral PCA. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Of 144 patients initiated on PCA after the first RHC, 89 (62%) received parenteral and 55 (38%) non-parenteral PCA.. At baseline, patients who started on parenteral PCA had more severe disease with higher mean PAP, RAP and PVR. On follow-up, parenteral PCAs led to greater reductions in mean PAP and RAP, with no differences in PVR, TPR, or CO changes. Survival was worse with parenteral PCA use even after adjusting for comorbidities and baseline hemodynamics (HR 1.93; 95% CI 1.17-3.18; p=0.009). Discussion: Parenteral PCAs were more often used in patients with more severe pulmonary vascular disease. Despite greater hemodynamic improvements, parenteral PCAs were associated with worse survival, likely due to more severe disease at baseline. Further research is needed to understand the role of PCA route in guiding treatment strategies.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Mayo Clinic (US), John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Abstract 4371345: Contemporary Use Of Parenteral Prostacyclin Administration In Pulmonary Artery Hypertension — Revati Varma, Yogesh Reddy · Circulation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS