Abstract 4370001: Outcomes of Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis

Background: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has emerged as an important therapeutic option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR), even in the challenging context of cardiogenic shock (CS). However, real-world data on the outcomes of TEER in this high-risk population are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of mortality, procedural complications, and heart failure hospitalizations following TEER in patients with MR and CS. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used TriNetX, a federated health research network including data from 101 healthcare organizations across the U.S. Adult patients diagnosed with CS (ICD-10 R57.0) and nonrheumatic MR (ICD-10 I34.0) who underwent TEER (ICD-10-PCS 02UG3JZ) between 2005 and 2025 were included. Outcomes assessed up to one year post-procedure included all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, pacemaker implantation, stroke, valve thrombosis, recurrent MR, and mechanical complications. Statistical analyses included risk proportions, hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Among 1,463 patients undergoing TEER for MR in the setting of CS, all-cause mortality at one year was 28.9% (n=424), reflecting the high-risk nature of this population (HR not available). Heart failure hospitalizations were documented in 11.2% (n=27/241 evaluable patients; HR not calculated due to limited cohort size). Pacemaker implantation occurred in 1.4% (n=20), stroke in 4.4% (n=58/1,314 evaluable patients; HR not available), valve thrombosis in 0.7% (n=10), recurrent MR in 0.9% (n=13), and mechanical complications in 1.0% (n=14). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated a survival probability of 68.6% at one year post-TEER. Conclusions: In this large, real-world cohort of patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing TEER, nearly one-third experienced mortality within one year, underscoring the critical prognosis in this population. Although procedural complications such as valve thrombosis, device-related issues, and pacemaker implantation were infrequent, heart failure hospitalizations remained a notable concern. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection and aggressive post-procedural management strategies to optimize outcomes in this high-risk group. Future studies should explore mechanisms of heart failure exacerbations and refine strategies to identify patients who may derive the greatest benefit from TEER in the setting of CS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370001
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370001: Outcomes of Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis

Anas Atrash, Anjali Pradhan, Pallavi Matai, Silvana Ellen Ribeiro Papp et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Abstract 4370001: Outcomes of Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis

Anas Atrash, Anjali Pradhan, Pallavi Matai, Silvana Ellen Ribeiro Papp, Rishay Patel
article en

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has emerged as an important therapeutic option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR), even in the challenging context of cardiogenic shock (CS). However, real-world data on the outcomes of TEER in this high-risk population are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of mortality, procedural complications, and heart failure hospitalizations following TEER in patients with MR and CS. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used TriNetX, a federated health research network including data from 101 healthcare organizations across the U.S. Adult patients diagnosed with CS (ICD-10 R57.0) and nonrheumatic MR (ICD-10 I34.0) who underwent TEER (ICD-10-PCS 02UG3JZ) between 2005 and 2025 were included. Outcomes assessed up to one year post-procedure included all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, pacemaker implantation, stroke, valve thrombosis, recurrent MR, and mechanical complications. Statistical analyses included risk proportions, hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Among 1,463 patients undergoing TEER for MR in the setting of CS, all-cause mortality at one year was 28.9% (n=424), reflecting the high-risk nature of this population (HR not available). Heart failure hospitalizations were documented in 11.2% (n=27/241 evaluable patients; HR not calculated due to limited cohort size). Pacemaker implantation occurred in 1.4% (n=20), stroke in 4.4% (n=58/1,314 evaluable patients; HR not available), valve thrombosis in 0.7% (n=10), recurrent MR in 0.9% (n=13), and mechanical complications in 1.0% (n=14). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated a survival probability of 68.6% at one year post-TEER. Conclusions: In this large, real-world cohort of patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing TEER, nearly one-third experienced mortality within one year, underscoring the critical prognosis in this population. Although procedural complications such as valve thrombosis, device-related issues, and pacemaker implantation were infrequent, heart failure hospitalizations remained a notable concern. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection and aggressive post-procedural management strategies to optimize outcomes in this high-risk group. Future studies should explore mechanisms of heart failure exacerbations and refine strategies to identify patients who may derive the greatest benefit from TEER in the setting of CS.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
UPMC Central Pa (US), Drexel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.