Abstract 4369028: Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Redefines Physiological Stimulation Standards in High-Risk Cardiac Populations

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a physiological alternative to conventional right ventricular pacing, yet its efficacy across diverse cardiac pathologies remains incompletely characterized. Methods: We conducted analysis of 47 cases documenting LBBAP implementation across various cardiac conditions, including congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy, and post-surgical scenarios. Primary endpoints included QRS duration reduction, left ventricular ejection fraction improvement, and procedural success rates. Results: LBBAP demonstrated remarkable versatility with 94% procedural success rate across all cardiac anatomies, including the most challenging cases. Mean QRS duration decreased from 168±24 ms to 118±18 ms (p<0.001), representing a 30% reduction in ventricular activation time. Left ventricular ejection fraction improved by an average of 12±8 percentage points over 6-month follow-up (p<0.001), with 78% of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvement exceeding 10 percentage points. LBBAP proved effective even in previously considered contraindicated scenarios including congenitally corrected transposition (3 cases with 100% success), cardiac amyloidosis with septal thickening >15mm (3 cases), post-TAVR complete heart block (4 cases), and patients with prior failed conventional pacing attempts (6 cases). In patients with established pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, LBBAP restoration achieved near-complete recovery of ventricular function in 89% of cases within 3 months, with mean ejection fraction improvement from 32±8% to 51±7%. Complications occurred in only 6.4% of cases, predominantly related to lead repositioning without permanent sequelae. Conclusions: LBBAP demonstrates superior outcomes with minimal complications, supporting expanded utilization as first-line therapy for physiological pacing across all cardiac conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4369028
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4369028: Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Redefines Physiological Stimulation Standards in High-Risk Cardiac Populations

Carly Bowser, Sudhanva Hegde, Shree Laya Vemula, Marc Sukhoo-Pertab et al.
Circulation
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Abstract 4369028: Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Redefines Physiological Stimulation Standards in High-Risk Cardiac Populations

Carly Bowser, Sudhanva Hegde, Shree Laya Vemula, Marc Sukhoo-Pertab, Allison Foster, Hrag Khodaverdian, Ashok Khanna, Dawid Ozga, NICOLAS SCHAEFFER
article en

Abstract

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a physiological alternative to conventional right ventricular pacing, yet its efficacy across diverse cardiac pathologies remains incompletely characterized. Methods: We conducted analysis of 47 cases documenting LBBAP implementation across various cardiac conditions, including congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy, and post-surgical scenarios. Primary endpoints included QRS duration reduction, left ventricular ejection fraction improvement, and procedural success rates. Results: LBBAP demonstrated remarkable versatility with 94% procedural success rate across all cardiac anatomies, including the most challenging cases. Mean QRS duration decreased from 168±24 ms to 118±18 ms (p<0.001), representing a 30% reduction in ventricular activation time. Left ventricular ejection fraction improved by an average of 12±8 percentage points over 6-month follow-up (p<0.001), with 78% of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvement exceeding 10 percentage points. LBBAP proved effective even in previously considered contraindicated scenarios including congenitally corrected transposition (3 cases with 100% success), cardiac amyloidosis with septal thickening >15mm (3 cases), post-TAVR complete heart block (4 cases), and patients with prior failed conventional pacing attempts (6 cases). In patients with established pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, LBBAP restoration achieved near-complete recovery of ventricular function in 89% of cases within 3 months, with mean ejection fraction improvement from 32±8% to 51±7%. Complications occurred in only 6.4% of cases, predominantly related to lead repositioning without permanent sequelae. Conclusions: LBBAP demonstrates superior outcomes with minimal complications, supporting expanded utilization as first-line therapy for physiological pacing across all cardiac conditions.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Center for Brooklyn History (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.