Abstract 4369071: Produce Prescription Delivery and Vouchers Are Feasible and Improve Nutrition Security and Diet Quality in Adults with Overweight and Obesity

Introduction/Background: Adults with overweight/obesity who face barriers to healthy food access are at increased risk of CVD. Produce prescription programs (PPP) may improve nutrition security and diet quality, but evidence on how PPP modality impacts short-term outcomes is limited. Objectives: We evaluated the feasibility of engaging adults with overweight/obesity and nutrition insecurity in an 8-week PPP and assessed 4-week changes in nutrition security, dietary quality, and self-efficacy within each PPP modality (home delivery and market voucher). Methods/Approach: We conducted an 8-week, 2-arm pilot intervention at a community market in Baltimore, MD (NCT06751563). Participants (randomized 1:1, stratified by transportation access) received weekly produce and behavioral support via text, either via home-delivered boxes or $20 market vouchers. We assessed nutrition security with the 4-item Nutrition Security Scale (range 0-4), diet quality with the Mini-EAT (range 0-100, >69=healthy, 61-69=intermediate, <61=unhealthy), and self-efficacy with the Healthy Eating and Weight Self-Efficacy Scale (range 5-55) at baseline and 4 weeks. Within-arm 4-week changes were explored using Wilcoxon Signed-rank test due to deviation from normality. Effect sizes were evaluated by Rank-Biserial Correlation. Results/Data: Of 48 adults enrolled (23 assigned to delivery and 25 to vouchers), mean age (SD) was 50(16) years, most identified as women (65%), Black or African American (83%), and not Hispanic or Latino (92%) (Table 1). Median (Q1, Q3) dietary quality at baseline was 58(54, 60), nutrition security was 2.0(1.7, 2.5), and self-efficacy was 33(29.5, 37.5). Median intake levels were 3-4 servings/week for fruits (35%) and vegetables (42%). Four-week survey completion was 92%. Both arms had significant improvements, with large effect sizes, in diet (voucher: 4.8, r=0.58; delivery: +3.8 r=0.57), representing a shift from unhealthy to intermediate diet quality. Both arms also had improvements in fruit intake (voucher: +2, r=0.67; delivery: +1, r=0.76) and nutrition security (voucher: +0.25, r=0.71; delivery: +0.5, r=0.53). The voucher arm had improvements in self-efficacy (+5, r=0.69). Vegetable intake improved overall, but not by arm (Table 2). Conclusion(s): In a community PPP pilot, both home delivery and market vouchers were feasible and improved nutrition insecurity and dietary quality in adults with overweight/obesity. Larger trials are needed to compare PPP modalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4369071
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4369071: Produce Prescription Delivery and Vouchers Are Feasible and Improve Nutrition Security and Diet Quality in Adults with Overweight and Obesity

Joyline Chepkorir, Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb, Hailey Miller, Abraham Lee et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4369071: Produce Prescription Delivery and Vouchers Are Feasible and Improve Nutrition Security and Diet Quality in Adults with Overweight and Obesity

Joyline Chepkorir, Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb, Hailey Miller, Abraham Lee, Wuraola Olawole, Prosper Okonkwo, Azuka Amaka Ngige
article en

Abstract

Introduction/Background: Adults with overweight/obesity who face barriers to healthy food access are at increased risk of CVD. Produce prescription programs (PPP) may improve nutrition security and diet quality, but evidence on how PPP modality impacts short-term outcomes is limited. Objectives: We evaluated the feasibility of engaging adults with overweight/obesity and nutrition insecurity in an 8-week PPP and assessed 4-week changes in nutrition security, dietary quality, and self-efficacy within each PPP modality (home delivery and market voucher). Methods/Approach: We conducted an 8-week, 2-arm pilot intervention at a community market in Baltimore, MD (NCT06751563). Participants (randomized 1:1, stratified by transportation access) received weekly produce and behavioral support via text, either via home-delivered boxes or $20 market vouchers. We assessed nutrition security with the 4-item Nutrition Security Scale (range 0-4), diet quality with the Mini-EAT (range 0-100, >69=healthy, 61-69=intermediate, <61=unhealthy), and self-efficacy with the Healthy Eating and Weight Self-Efficacy Scale (range 5-55) at baseline and 4 weeks. Within-arm 4-week changes were explored using Wilcoxon Signed-rank test due to deviation from normality. Effect sizes were evaluated by Rank-Biserial Correlation. Results/Data: Of 48 adults enrolled (23 assigned to delivery and 25 to vouchers), mean age (SD) was 50(16) years, most identified as women (65%), Black or African American (83%), and not Hispanic or Latino (92%) (Table 1). Median (Q1, Q3) dietary quality at baseline was 58(54, 60), nutrition security was 2.0(1.7, 2.5), and self-efficacy was 33(29.5, 37.5). Median intake levels were 3-4 servings/week for fruits (35%) and vegetables (42%). Four-week survey completion was 92%. Both arms had significant improvements, with large effect sizes, in diet (voucher: 4.8, r=0.58; delivery: +3.8 r=0.57), representing a shift from unhealthy to intermediate diet quality. Both arms also had improvements in fruit intake (voucher: +2, r=0.67; delivery: +1, r=0.76) and nutrition security (voucher: +0.25, r=0.71; delivery: +0.5, r=0.53). The voucher arm had improvements in self-efficacy (+5, r=0.69). Vegetable intake improved overall, but not by arm (Table 2). Conclusion(s): In a community PPP pilot, both home delivery and market vouchers were feasible and improved nutrition insecurity and dietary quality in adults with overweight/obesity. Larger trials are needed to compare PPP modalities.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.