Abstract 4370902: Sex Differences in Latent Profiles of Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage: A UK Biobank Analysis

Background: Hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) can develop concurrently in the heart, the brain, the kidneys and the vasculature, yet most research still relies on counting the number of affected systems or recording the presence versus absence of multi-organ damage, approaches that overlook the complex, multisystem nature of HMOD. Objective: To identify HMOD profiles in adults with hypertension and to quantify sex-specific differences. Methods: We analyzed 4,787 UK Biobank participants with physician-diagnosed or self-reported hypertension (mean ± SD age 57.4 ± 6.8 years; 41.6 % women). Twenty-two continuous indicators, assessed at baseline or first follow-up and spanning cardiac structure and function, vascular stiffness, brain integrity (white-matter hyperintensity volume and fractional anisotropy), and renal function, were log-transformed and entered into latent profile analysis (LPA). Sex differences in profile membership were subsequently examined. Results: A four-profile solution (entropy = 0.86) best balanced statistical fit with clinical interpretability. The largest profile, comprising 38.0% participants, showed modest arterial stiffness and mild concentric left-ventricular remodeling with largely preserved cerebral and renal integrity; males were more common in this group (17% females vs 53.2% males, p < 0.001). A second profile (37.6%) was marked by heightened autonomic tone, micro-albuminuria and subtle micro-structural brain changes without overt cardiac dysfunction (65.4% females vs 17.6% males, p < 0.001). The third profile (22.1 %) combined QRS prolongation, elevated cystatin-C and albumin-creatinine ratio, and a higher burden of white-matter hyperintensities, indicating a cardio-neuro-renal stress pattern (15.3% females vs 27.1% males, p < 0.001). The smallest profile (2.2 %) exhibited pronounced ventricular dilatation, reduced ejection fraction, rapid ventricular rate and marked QRS widening, consistent with cardiac overload and dysfunction; (2.4 % females vs 2.0% males). Conclusion: LPA identifies four biologically coherent HMOD profiles. Most males fall into a mild vascular–cardiac strain profile, underscoring the need for optimized blood pressure control and arterial stiffness monitoring. Most females cluster in an autonomic–renal–cerebral stress profile with preserved cardiac function, indicating that early renal and neurovascular surveillance should be prioritized for them even when conventional cardiac indices appear normal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370902
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370902: Sex Differences in Latent Profiles of Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage: A UK Biobank Analysis

Abhinav Sharma, Hassan Behlouli, Natasha Rajah, Colin Berry et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4370902: Sex Differences in Latent Profiles of Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage: A UK Biobank Analysis

Abhinav Sharma, Hassan Behlouli, Natasha Rajah, Colin Berry, Adriana Angarita Fonseca, Thomas A. Mavrakanas, Amanpreet Kaur, Louise Pilote
article en

Abstract

Background: Hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) can develop concurrently in the heart, the brain, the kidneys and the vasculature, yet most research still relies on counting the number of affected systems or recording the presence versus absence of multi-organ damage, approaches that overlook the complex, multisystem nature of HMOD. Objective: To identify HMOD profiles in adults with hypertension and to quantify sex-specific differences. Methods: We analyzed 4,787 UK Biobank participants with physician-diagnosed or self-reported hypertension (mean ± SD age 57.4 ± 6.8 years; 41.6 % women). Twenty-two continuous indicators, assessed at baseline or first follow-up and spanning cardiac structure and function, vascular stiffness, brain integrity (white-matter hyperintensity volume and fractional anisotropy), and renal function, were log-transformed and entered into latent profile analysis (LPA). Sex differences in profile membership were subsequently examined. Results: A four-profile solution (entropy = 0.86) best balanced statistical fit with clinical interpretability. The largest profile, comprising 38.0% participants, showed modest arterial stiffness and mild concentric left-ventricular remodeling with largely preserved cerebral and renal integrity; males were more common in this group (17% females vs 53.2% males, p < 0.001). A second profile (37.6%) was marked by heightened autonomic tone, micro-albuminuria and subtle micro-structural brain changes without overt cardiac dysfunction (65.4% females vs 17.6% males, p < 0.001). The third profile (22.1 %) combined QRS prolongation, elevated cystatin-C and albumin-creatinine ratio, and a higher burden of white-matter hyperintensities, indicating a cardio-neuro-renal stress pattern (15.3% females vs 27.1% males, p < 0.001). The smallest profile (2.2 %) exhibited pronounced ventricular dilatation, reduced ejection fraction, rapid ventricular rate and marked QRS widening, consistent with cardiac overload and dysfunction; (2.4 % females vs 2.0% males). Conclusion: LPA identifies four biologically coherent HMOD profiles. Most males fall into a mild vascular–cardiac strain profile, underscoring the need for optimized blood pressure control and arterial stiffness monitoring. Most females cluster in an autonomic–renal–cerebral stress profile with preserved cardiac function, indicating that early renal and neurovascular surveillance should be prioritized for them even when conventional cardiac indices appear normal.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
McGill University Health Centre (CA), McGill University (CA), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.