Abstract 4366828: Does Qualitative Coronary Artery Calcium on Prior Chest CT Add to Risk Stratification of Chest Pain in the Emergency Room?

Background: Chest pain patients with moderate elevations of high sensitivity troponins (i.e., between the 99th percentile and what is considered “positive”) benefit from additional risk stratification modalities to improve discharge decision-making. In the present study we evaluated the benefit of adding qualitative coronary calcium (qCAC) from prior routine chest CT to both high sensitivity troponin T(hsTnT) series and determination of the Heart Score (HS) Methods: This single-centre retrospective study analysed 1,500 patients evaluated for chest pain with moderate peak hsTnT (12-51ng/L). Thirty-day major adverse outcomes(MACE) were assessed based on peak hsTnT alone and with the addition of the HS and qCAC on chest CT performed within 5 years of CP presentation. A multivariate logistic regression was performed on patients with available qCAC data (n=1,037) to assess the independent predictive value of qCAC presence, age, and sex. For a more comprehensive model, a sub-cohort of 627 patients with complete data for MACE, qCAC, peak hsTnT, and a dichotomized HEART score (<3 vs. >3) was isolated and Firth’s penalized logistic regression was employed to assess the combined predictive power of these variables Results: The median age of the cohort was 69yrs , 59% were male, 81% had qCAC on review of routine chest CT scans. Dichotomized HS (OR=9.27 (95% CI=2.21-38.86) p<0.001) and qCAC (6.83 (1.57-29.80) p=0.011) were independent predictors of 30-day MACE. The absence of qCAC demonstrated a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.1% for ruling out 30-day MACE. A Firth’s penalized regression model including peak hsTnT, HS and qCAC was successfully fitted (model p=0.002) and revealed that peak hsTnT was the most robust predictor of MACE (OR 1.05/unit increase, 95% CI 1.02-1.09, p=0.005). A HEART score >3 had borderline-significant association (OR 14.71, 95% CI 0.88-246.19, p=0.061). In this final comprehensive model, the direct statistical effect of qCAC was attenuated (p=0.111) Conclusion: The presence of qCAC on routine chest CT is an independent predictor of 30-day MACE, its absence is also clinically significant, with a high negative predictive value. However, qCAC does not add incremental risk stratification to a risk algorithm including hsTnT and HS. It should be noted that our cohort was older and had high rate of qCAC- further study should examine the incremental benefit of adding qCAC to a risk stratification strategy among younger patients with less prevalent qCAC

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4366828
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4366828: Does Qualitative Coronary Artery Calcium on Prior Chest CT Add to Risk Stratification of Chest Pain in the Emergency Room?

Aradhya Abrol, Martin E. Matsumura, Rafla Hassan, Smith Frimpong et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 4366828: Does Qualitative Coronary Artery Calcium on Prior Chest CT Add to Risk Stratification of Chest Pain in the Emergency Room?

Aradhya Abrol, Martin E. Matsumura, Rafla Hassan, Smith Frimpong, Dima Khalil
article en

Abstract

Background: Chest pain patients with moderate elevations of high sensitivity troponins (i.e., between the 99th percentile and what is considered “positive”) benefit from additional risk stratification modalities to improve discharge decision-making. In the present study we evaluated the benefit of adding qualitative coronary calcium (qCAC) from prior routine chest CT to both high sensitivity troponin T(hsTnT) series and determination of the Heart Score (HS) Methods: This single-centre retrospective study analysed 1,500 patients evaluated for chest pain with moderate peak hsTnT (12-51ng/L). Thirty-day major adverse outcomes(MACE) were assessed based on peak hsTnT alone and with the addition of the HS and qCAC on chest CT performed within 5 years of CP presentation. A multivariate logistic regression was performed on patients with available qCAC data (n=1,037) to assess the independent predictive value of qCAC presence, age, and sex. For a more comprehensive model, a sub-cohort of 627 patients with complete data for MACE, qCAC, peak hsTnT, and a dichotomized HEART score (<3 vs. >3) was isolated and Firth’s penalized logistic regression was employed to assess the combined predictive power of these variables Results: The median age of the cohort was 69yrs , 59% were male, 81% had qCAC on review of routine chest CT scans. Dichotomized HS (OR=9.27 (95% CI=2.21-38.86) p<0.001) and qCAC (6.83 (1.57-29.80) p=0.011) were independent predictors of 30-day MACE. The absence of qCAC demonstrated a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.1% for ruling out 30-day MACE. A Firth’s penalized regression model including peak hsTnT, HS and qCAC was successfully fitted (model p=0.002) and revealed that peak hsTnT was the most robust predictor of MACE (OR 1.05/unit increase, 95% CI 1.02-1.09, p=0.005). A HEART score >3 had borderline-significant association (OR 14.71, 95% CI 0.88-246.19, p=0.061). In this final comprehensive model, the direct statistical effect of qCAC was attenuated (p=0.111) Conclusion: The presence of qCAC on routine chest CT is an independent predictor of 30-day MACE, its absence is also clinically significant, with a high negative predictive value. However, qCAC does not add incremental risk stratification to a risk algorithm including hsTnT and HS. It should be noted that our cohort was older and had high rate of qCAC- further study should examine the incremental benefit of adding qCAC to a risk stratification strategy among younger patients with less prevalent qCAC

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Geisinger Health System (US), Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.