Abstract 4370047: Creation of U.S. Population-Based, Age- and Sex-Specific Percentile Reference Standards for Atherogenic Lipid Measurements

Background: Atherogenic lipid concentrations (non-HDL-C, LDL-C, and apoB) typically increase during young adulthood. However, “normal” ranges used in clinical care are derived from distributions from middle-aged populations, potentially underestimating lipid burden in young adults. Age- and sex-specific percentiles may provide a more accurate understanding of lipid burden across the life course. Methods: We used National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 1999-August 2023, including adults aged 18 to 79 years with non-missing non-HDL-C, LDL-C, or apoB. For participants reporting treatment with statins, we imputed underlying lipid measures using censored data methods. We created age- and sex-specific lipid percentiles in a “healthy” cohort, defined as body mass index >18.5 and <30 kg/m 2 , glucose <126 mg/dL, no diabetes, and no ASCVD, using a modified LMS estimation procedure as done for the 2000 CDC Pediatric Growth Charts. Results: We included 4,723, 4,596, and 2,979 participants in our healthy non-HDL-C, LDL-C, and apoB participant samples, respectively, for the creation of percentiles; 52% were female. Estimated treatment effects assuming imputed underlying lipids in treated adults corresponded to mean percent reductions of 28%, 31%, and 26% for non-HDL-C, LDL-C, and apoB, respectively. As expected, the absolute lipid levels reflected in age-specific percentiles were higher in middle age than in young adulthood (Figure). For men, the median (IQR) lipid values (in mg/dL) for ages 18-40, 41-60, and 61-79y were 137 (119-151), 168 (166-169), and 159 (154-163) for non-HDL-C; 115 (101-125), 139 (137-139), and 134 (131-136) for LDL-C; and 89 (79-97), 108 (106-109), and 107 (106-108) for apoB, respectively. For women, the median values for ages 18-40, 41-60, and 61-79y were 117 (108-127), 152 (145-158), and 172 (168-174) for non-HDL-C; 100 (90-109), 132 (126-136), and 145 (143-145) for LDL-C; and 78 (73-83), 99 (95-103), and 111 (109-111) for apoB, respectively. Conclusion: The lipid levels represented by age- and sex-specific percentiles vary substantially across adulthood, indicating that percentile-based assessments may better reflect lipid burden across the adult life course than absolute values obtained from middle-aged adults. Further research is needed to evaluate their predictive value for cumulative lipid exposure and ASCVD risk, as well as their interpretability and acceptance in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370047
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370047: Creation of U.S. Population-Based, Age- and Sex-Specific Percentile Reference Standards for Atherogenic Lipid Measurements

John T. Wilkins, Norrina B. Allen, Lucia C. Petito, Abigail Gauen
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4370047: Creation of U.S. Population-Based, Age- and Sex-Specific Percentile Reference Standards for Atherogenic Lipid Measurements

John T. Wilkins, Norrina B. Allen, Lucia C. Petito, Abigail Gauen
article en

Abstract

Background: Atherogenic lipid concentrations (non-HDL-C, LDL-C, and apoB) typically increase during young adulthood. However, “normal” ranges used in clinical care are derived from distributions from middle-aged populations, potentially underestimating lipid burden in young adults. Age- and sex-specific percentiles may provide a more accurate understanding of lipid burden across the life course. Methods: We used National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 1999-August 2023, including adults aged 18 to 79 years with non-missing non-HDL-C, LDL-C, or apoB. For participants reporting treatment with statins, we imputed underlying lipid measures using censored data methods. We created age- and sex-specific lipid percentiles in a “healthy” cohort, defined as body mass index >18.5 and <30 kg/m 2 , glucose <126 mg/dL, no diabetes, and no ASCVD, using a modified LMS estimation procedure as done for the 2000 CDC Pediatric Growth Charts. Results: We included 4,723, 4,596, and 2,979 participants in our healthy non-HDL-C, LDL-C, and apoB participant samples, respectively, for the creation of percentiles; 52% were female. Estimated treatment effects assuming imputed underlying lipids in treated adults corresponded to mean percent reductions of 28%, 31%, and 26% for non-HDL-C, LDL-C, and apoB, respectively. As expected, the absolute lipid levels reflected in age-specific percentiles were higher in middle age than in young adulthood (Figure). For men, the median (IQR) lipid values (in mg/dL) for ages 18-40, 41-60, and 61-79y were 137 (119-151), 168 (166-169), and 159 (154-163) for non-HDL-C; 115 (101-125), 139 (137-139), and 134 (131-136) for LDL-C; and 89 (79-97), 108 (106-109), and 107 (106-108) for apoB, respectively. For women, the median values for ages 18-40, 41-60, and 61-79y were 117 (108-127), 152 (145-158), and 172 (168-174) for non-HDL-C; 100 (90-109), 132 (126-136), and 145 (143-145) for LDL-C; and 78 (73-83), 99 (95-103), and 111 (109-111) for apoB, respectively. Conclusion: The lipid levels represented by age- and sex-specific percentiles vary substantially across adulthood, indicating that percentile-based assessments may better reflect lipid burden across the adult life course than absolute values obtained from middle-aged adults. Further research is needed to evaluate their predictive value for cumulative lipid exposure and ASCVD risk, as well as their interpretability and acceptance in clinical practice.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Northwestern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.