Abstract Sat904: A Recalled Experience of Death Among Cardiac Arrest Survivors Is Associated with Improved Psychological Outcomes

Background: Cardiac Arrest (CA) studies report negative psychological outcomes (anxiety (13-61%), depression (14-45%), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (19-27%)) among survivors. In contrast, ~10% of survivors report unique positive experiences of a purposeful review of life events, a perception of lucidity with external visual awareness, and transformation with greater meaning, referred to as a recalled experience of death (RED). Hypothesis: Undergoing a recalled experience of death during CA may protect against negative psychological outcomes, and increase positive psychological outcomes among survivors. Methods: We established an ongoing cross-sectional study to examine psychological outcomes of CA survivors. Inclusion: CA history; age ≥ 18. We collected demographics and utilized validated scales: GAD-7 (anxiety), PHQ-9 (depression), SSS-PTSD, EQ-8 (empathy), Benefit Finding scale, Prosocial Altruistic Personality scale, SCBCS (compassion), SHS (happiness), GQ-6 (gratitude), SFI (life-satisfaction), DSES (spirituality), TFS (forgiveness), MCSDS (social desirability), LOT-R (optimism), and PTGI-SF (post-traumatic growth). RED was identified with a validated scale (near death scale) and interview confirmation. Outcomes were tested with bivariate analyses, controlled for false-discovery rate. A regression model was fitted to control for significant covariates. Results: Among 135 CA survivors, 26 (19%) had a RED. No reported differences in anxiety or depression were found. However, PTSD was higher in those with RED vs. No-RED (65% vs. 32%; p =0.03), with 98% reporting PTSD only after CA. Among positive psychological outcomes, those with RED had higher scores in benefit finding ( Mdn =65 vs. 57; p =0.03), altruism ( Mdn =46 vs. 35; p =0.04), spirituality ( Mdn =25 vs. 16; p =0.02), and PTGI ( Mdn =37 vs. 27; p =0.02) vs. No-RED. Bivariate analyses between PTSD and positive psychological outcomes showed a difference only in PTGI ( p =0.014). Even after adjusting for PTSD, those with RED demonstrated significantly greater PTGI vs. No-RED (β=6.98, SE =2.7, 95% CI [1.6, 12.4], p =0.012). Conclusion: PTSD may occur more frequently in CA survivors who undergo a RED, however, RED is itself associated with greater positive psychological outcomes (altruism, benefit finding, spirituality, growth). Studies are needed to evaluate the mechanism underlying RED, PTSD and positive psychological outcomes and establish future clinical trials targeting improvements in psychological outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.sat904
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sat904: A Recalled Experience of Death Among Cardiac Arrest Survivors Is Associated with Improved Psychological Outcomes

Anelly Gonzales, Tao He, Sam Parnia, C. Ingram et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract Sat904: A Recalled Experience of Death Among Cardiac Arrest Survivors Is Associated with Improved Psychological Outcomes

Anelly Gonzales, Tao He, Sam Parnia, C. Ingram, Sacha Moore, Liang Wei, Imani Goins
article en

Abstract

Background: Cardiac Arrest (CA) studies report negative psychological outcomes (anxiety (13-61%), depression (14-45%), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (19-27%)) among survivors. In contrast, ~10% of survivors report unique positive experiences of a purposeful review of life events, a perception of lucidity with external visual awareness, and transformation with greater meaning, referred to as a recalled experience of death (RED). Hypothesis: Undergoing a recalled experience of death during CA may protect against negative psychological outcomes, and increase positive psychological outcomes among survivors. Methods: We established an ongoing cross-sectional study to examine psychological outcomes of CA survivors. Inclusion: CA history; age ≥ 18. We collected demographics and utilized validated scales: GAD-7 (anxiety), PHQ-9 (depression), SSS-PTSD, EQ-8 (empathy), Benefit Finding scale, Prosocial Altruistic Personality scale, SCBCS (compassion), SHS (happiness), GQ-6 (gratitude), SFI (life-satisfaction), DSES (spirituality), TFS (forgiveness), MCSDS (social desirability), LOT-R (optimism), and PTGI-SF (post-traumatic growth). RED was identified with a validated scale (near death scale) and interview confirmation. Outcomes were tested with bivariate analyses, controlled for false-discovery rate. A regression model was fitted to control for significant covariates. Results: Among 135 CA survivors, 26 (19%) had a RED. No reported differences in anxiety or depression were found. However, PTSD was higher in those with RED vs. No-RED (65% vs. 32%; p =0.03), with 98% reporting PTSD only after CA. Among positive psychological outcomes, those with RED had higher scores in benefit finding ( Mdn =65 vs. 57; p =0.03), altruism ( Mdn =46 vs. 35; p =0.04), spirituality ( Mdn =25 vs. 16; p =0.02), and PTGI ( Mdn =37 vs. 27; p =0.02) vs. No-RED. Bivariate analyses between PTSD and positive psychological outcomes showed a difference only in PTGI ( p =0.014). Even after adjusting for PTSD, those with RED demonstrated significantly greater PTGI vs. No-RED (β=6.98, SE =2.7, 95% CI [1.6, 12.4], p =0.012). Conclusion: PTSD may occur more frequently in CA survivors who undergo a RED, however, RED is itself associated with greater positive psychological outcomes (altruism, benefit finding, spirituality, growth). Studies are needed to evaluate the mechanism underlying RED, PTSD and positive psychological outcomes and establish future clinical trials targeting improvements in psychological outcomes.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
NYU Langone Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.