Abstract 4361536: Diverging Trends in Cardiovascular Mortality: A Comparative Analysis of GBD and CDC WONDER for Five Conditions (1999–2020)

Background: Understanding cardiovascular mortality is key for shaping public health priorities. Two major sources in the U.S.—CDC WONDER and the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study—report mortality differently. While CDC WONDER reflects death certificate data, GBD employs modeling techniques and redistributes ill-defined ("garbage") codes to improve cause of death attribution. Prior comparisons have focused on ischemic heart disease and stroke, but other cardiovascular conditions remain understudied. Methods: We examined trends in valvular heart disease (I34.0-I37.9), hypertensive heart disease (I11.0, I11.9), peripheral arterial disease (I70.2), infective endocarditis (I38), and aortic aneurysm (I71) using both databases from 1999–2020. Annual U.S. mortality data from GBD and CDC WONDER were analyzed. For each condition, absolute deaths and crude mortality rates (CMRs) per 100,000 population were extracted. Percent change from 1999 to 2020 was calculated. CMRs were reported with 95% uncertainty intervals (UI) for GBD and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CDC WONDER. Results: Substantial differences were found between the databases. Valvular heart disease deaths rose by 38.8% (GBD) and 32.2% (CDC). CMRs increased from 7.15 (UI: 7.62–6.18) to 8.33 (9.12–6.74) in GBD and from 11.8 (CI: 11.7–11.9) to 13.2 (13.1–13.4) in CDC. Hypertensive heart disease exhibited the most pronounced increase where deaths rose by 147.2% (GBD) and 474.7% (CDC). GBD CMRs rose from 10.6 (11.2–9.46) to 22.0 (23.62–19.21); CDC from 8.9 (9.2–8.9) to 43.8 (44.3–43.8). Peripheral arterial disease deaths rose 20.9% (GBD) but fell 50.4% (CDC). CMRs changed from 3.21 (3.45–2.82) to 3.26 (3.55–2.78) in GBD and from 0.6 (0.6–0.7) to 0.3 (0.3–0.3) in CDC. Infective endocarditis deaths increased by 41.9% (GBD) and 36.4% (CDC). CMRs rose from 2.4 (2.53–2.17) to 2.86 (3.07–2.50) in GBD and from 3.3 (3.4–3.3) to 3.8 (3.9–3.8) in CDC. Aortic aneurysm deaths declined 31.6% (GBD) and 18.9% (CDC). GBD CMRs fell from 6.19 (6.45–5.63) to 3.55 (3.76–3.15); CDC from 7.9 (8.0–7.8) to 5.4 (5.5–5.3). Conclusion: Cardiovascular mortality trends varied significantly between GBD and CDC WONDER. Differences were especially striking in hypertensive heart disease and peripheral arterial disease, likely due to methodological variation in death coding and redistribution. Awareness of these discrepancies is crucial for interpreting national mortality data and informing policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4361536
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4361536: Diverging Trends in Cardiovascular Mortality: A Comparative Analysis of GBD and CDC WONDER for Five Conditions (1999–2020)

Adluri Ram Sudheer, Rohan Deo, Hrushikesh Reddy Pamreddy, Kyle Gobeil et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4361536: Diverging Trends in Cardiovascular Mortality: A Comparative Analysis of GBD and CDC WONDER for Five Conditions (1999–2020)

Adluri Ram Sudheer, Rohan Deo, Hrushikesh Reddy Pamreddy, Kyle Gobeil, Aishwarya Yamparala, Warren Fernandes, Ajitha Ganesan, Rhea Bohra, Vidit Majmundar, Bolivia Fernandes
article en

Abstract

Background: Understanding cardiovascular mortality is key for shaping public health priorities. Two major sources in the U.S.—CDC WONDER and the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study—report mortality differently. While CDC WONDER reflects death certificate data, GBD employs modeling techniques and redistributes ill-defined ("garbage") codes to improve cause of death attribution. Prior comparisons have focused on ischemic heart disease and stroke, but other cardiovascular conditions remain understudied. Methods: We examined trends in valvular heart disease (I34.0-I37.9), hypertensive heart disease (I11.0, I11.9), peripheral arterial disease (I70.2), infective endocarditis (I38), and aortic aneurysm (I71) using both databases from 1999–2020. Annual U.S. mortality data from GBD and CDC WONDER were analyzed. For each condition, absolute deaths and crude mortality rates (CMRs) per 100,000 population were extracted. Percent change from 1999 to 2020 was calculated. CMRs were reported with 95% uncertainty intervals (UI) for GBD and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CDC WONDER. Results: Substantial differences were found between the databases. Valvular heart disease deaths rose by 38.8% (GBD) and 32.2% (CDC). CMRs increased from 7.15 (UI: 7.62–6.18) to 8.33 (9.12–6.74) in GBD and from 11.8 (CI: 11.7–11.9) to 13.2 (13.1–13.4) in CDC. Hypertensive heart disease exhibited the most pronounced increase where deaths rose by 147.2% (GBD) and 474.7% (CDC). GBD CMRs rose from 10.6 (11.2–9.46) to 22.0 (23.62–19.21); CDC from 8.9 (9.2–8.9) to 43.8 (44.3–43.8). Peripheral arterial disease deaths rose 20.9% (GBD) but fell 50.4% (CDC). CMRs changed from 3.21 (3.45–2.82) to 3.26 (3.55–2.78) in GBD and from 0.6 (0.6–0.7) to 0.3 (0.3–0.3) in CDC. Infective endocarditis deaths increased by 41.9% (GBD) and 36.4% (CDC). CMRs rose from 2.4 (2.53–2.17) to 2.86 (3.07–2.50) in GBD and from 3.3 (3.4–3.3) to 3.8 (3.9–3.8) in CDC. Aortic aneurysm deaths declined 31.6% (GBD) and 18.9% (CDC). GBD CMRs fell from 6.19 (6.45–5.63) to 3.55 (3.76–3.15); CDC from 7.9 (8.0–7.8) to 5.4 (5.5–5.3). Conclusion: Cardiovascular mortality trends varied significantly between GBD and CDC WONDER. Differences were especially striking in hypertensive heart disease and peripheral arterial disease, likely due to methodological variation in death coding and redistribution. Awareness of these discrepancies is crucial for interpreting national mortality data and informing policy.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Baystate Medical Center (US), Saint Vincent Hospital (US), University of Saint Mary (US), Baystate Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.