Abstract 4359241: Cholesterol Management in US Individuals with ASCVD within the Family Heart Database <sup>®</sup> during 2022/23: Current State of Care and Opportunities for Improvement

Background: Individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) have increased risk of recurrent events and need optimized low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering therapy, yet the factors contributing to LDL-C management, including clinician prescribing patterns, are not well understood. Objective: To characterize the current state of LDL-C management in US individuals with ASCVD and prescribing patterns of clinicians providing care. Methods: A cohort study of the national Family Heart Database during 2022-23 was conducted in individuals with ASCVD and ≥1 medication claim in both years and an LDL-C measure. Clinicians writing ≥5 LDL-C lowering prescriptions were included. The lowest achieved LDL-C level (&lt;55 mg/dL; 55-69 mg/dL; ≥70 mg/dL); highest intensity LDL-C lowering therapy prescribed (high intensity; low/moderate intensity; none); and duration of dispensed LDL-C lowering therapy (&gt;20 of 24 months; 13 to 20 months; &gt;0 to &lt; 13 months; none) were characterized. Corresponding percent of clinicians prescribing statin monotherapy and non-statin LDL-C therapies was assessed. Results: The database included adults (n=3,593,954) with ASCVD, mean age 67 years, 48% women, 11% Black individuals, and 7% aged &lt;50 years. Of these, 41% had an LDL-C &lt;70 mg/dL, 41% received high intensity LDL-C lowering therapy, and 35% were dispensed LDL-C lowering therapy for &gt;20 of 24 months; only 13% were found to have LDL-C management across all three of these components. According to multivariable logistic regression models, women, Black individuals, those &lt;50 years old, and those with peripheral arterial and cerebrovascular disease were less well managed (see table). Of 247,318 clinicians, 50% prescribed only statin monotherapy, including 8% who prescribed only low/moderate intensity statins. Only 7308 clinicians (3%) were responsible for prescribing half (50%) of all non-statins; within this group of predominantly cardiologists, the ratio of statin to non-statin prescriptions was 3:1. Conclusions: In this cohort of 3.6 million US individuals with ASCVD there was a substantial gap between guideline recommended LDL-C management and clinical care. Several modifiable factors contributed to this gap including low use of non-statin LDL-C therapies in this high risk population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4359241
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4359241: Cholesterol Management in US Individuals with ASCVD within the Family Heart Database ® during 2022/23: Current State of Care and Opportunities for Improvement

Laurence S. Sperling, Katherine Wilemon, Diane MacDougall, Keith C. Ferdinand et al.
Circulation
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Abstract 4359241: Cholesterol Management in US Individuals with ASCVD within the Family Heart Database ® during 2022/23: Current State of Care and Opportunities for Improvement

Laurence S. Sperling, Katherine Wilemon, Diane MacDougall, Keith C. Ferdinand, Seth J. Baum, Steven E. Nissen, Bonnie Hartsuff
article en

Abstract

Background: Individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) have increased risk of recurrent events and need optimized low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering therapy, yet the factors contributing to LDL-C management, including clinician prescribing patterns, are not well understood. Objective: To characterize the current state of LDL-C management in US individuals with ASCVD and prescribing patterns of clinicians providing care. Methods: A cohort study of the national Family Heart Database during 2022-23 was conducted in individuals with ASCVD and ≥1 medication claim in both years and an LDL-C measure. Clinicians writing ≥5 LDL-C lowering prescriptions were included. The lowest achieved LDL-C level (&lt;55 mg/dL; 55-69 mg/dL; ≥70 mg/dL); highest intensity LDL-C lowering therapy prescribed (high intensity; low/moderate intensity; none); and duration of dispensed LDL-C lowering therapy (&gt;20 of 24 months; 13 to 20 months; &gt;0 to &lt; 13 months; none) were characterized. Corresponding percent of clinicians prescribing statin monotherapy and non-statin LDL-C therapies was assessed. Results: The database included adults (n=3,593,954) with ASCVD, mean age 67 years, 48% women, 11% Black individuals, and 7% aged &lt;50 years. Of these, 41% had an LDL-C &lt;70 mg/dL, 41% received high intensity LDL-C lowering therapy, and 35% were dispensed LDL-C lowering therapy for &gt;20 of 24 months; only 13% were found to have LDL-C management across all three of these components. According to multivariable logistic regression models, women, Black individuals, those &lt;50 years old, and those with peripheral arterial and cerebrovascular disease were less well managed (see table). Of 247,318 clinicians, 50% prescribed only statin monotherapy, including 8% who prescribed only low/moderate intensity statins. Only 7308 clinicians (3%) were responsible for prescribing half (50%) of all non-statins; within this group of predominantly cardiologists, the ratio of statin to non-statin prescriptions was 3:1. Conclusions: In this cohort of 3.6 million US individuals with ASCVD there was a substantial gap between guideline recommended LDL-C management and clinical care. Several modifiable factors contributed to this gap including low use of non-statin LDL-C therapies in this high risk population.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Tulane University (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Boca Raton Regional Hospital (US), Heart Foundation (US), Chelsea Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.