Abstract 4339644: Early Versus Late Initiation of Oral Anticoagulants After Ischemic Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is present in approximately 20% of ischemic stroke patients. While oral anticoagulants (OACs) are effective in reducing stroke risk, the optimal timing for initiating OACs after acute ischemic stroke remains uncertain, with varying recommendations across guidelines. Hypothesis: Early initiation of OACs following ischemic stroke in patients with AF is as safe and effective as late initiation in preventing recurrent ischemic events. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early versus late OAC initiation in adults with AF and recent ischemic stroke. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed through October 2024. The primary outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke. Secondary outcomes included major extracranial bleeding, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), non-major bleeding, systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Three RCTs involving 6,522 patients were included. No significant difference was observed in recurrent ischemic stroke between early and late OAC initiation (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.61–1.11; P=0.19). Similarly, no significant differences were seen in major extracranial bleeding (RR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.22–1.01; P=0.05), sICH (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.44–1.96; P=0.84), non-major bleeding (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.79–1.45; P=0.65), systemic embolism (RR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.16–1.11; P=0.08), or all-cause mortality (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.50–1.24; P=0.30). Conclusion: Early initiation of OACs after ischemic stroke in patients with AF appears to be as safe as delayed initiation, with no increased risk of bleeding or mortality. Although the difference in efficacy was not statistically significant, the trend toward reduced stroke recurrence with early therapy supports further investigation. These findings may inform individualized decision-making in the acute stroke setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4339644
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4339644: Early Versus Late Initiation of Oral Anticoagulants After Ischemic Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Mohamed Abuelazm, AlMothana Manasrah, Ahmed Mazen Amin, Maram Albandak et al.
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4339644: Early Versus Late Initiation of Oral Anticoagulants After Ischemic Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Mohamed Abuelazm, AlMothana Manasrah, Ahmed Mazen Amin, Maram Albandak, Mohammad Tanashat, Afzal Rehman
article en

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is present in approximately 20% of ischemic stroke patients. While oral anticoagulants (OACs) are effective in reducing stroke risk, the optimal timing for initiating OACs after acute ischemic stroke remains uncertain, with varying recommendations across guidelines. Hypothesis: Early initiation of OACs following ischemic stroke in patients with AF is as safe and effective as late initiation in preventing recurrent ischemic events. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early versus late OAC initiation in adults with AF and recent ischemic stroke. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed through October 2024. The primary outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke. Secondary outcomes included major extracranial bleeding, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), non-major bleeding, systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Three RCTs involving 6,522 patients were included. No significant difference was observed in recurrent ischemic stroke between early and late OAC initiation (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.61–1.11; P=0.19). Similarly, no significant differences were seen in major extracranial bleeding (RR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.22–1.01; P=0.05), sICH (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.44–1.96; P=0.84), non-major bleeding (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.79–1.45; P=0.65), systemic embolism (RR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.16–1.11; P=0.08), or all-cause mortality (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.50–1.24; P=0.30). Conclusion: Early initiation of OACs after ischemic stroke in patients with AF appears to be as safe as delayed initiation, with no increased risk of bleeding or mortality. Although the difference in efficacy was not statistically significant, the trend toward reduced stroke recurrence with early therapy supports further investigation. These findings may inform individualized decision-making in the acute stroke setting.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Mansoura University (EG), Tanta University (EG), Yarmouk University (JO), University of Toledo (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.