Abstract 4363309: Association of Biologic Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Risk of Cardiac Arrhythmias: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Introduction/Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk for cardiac arrhythmias due to chronic systemic inflammation. The potential protective effects of biologic therapy against arrhythmias have not been well established in large population data. Research Question/Hypothesis: We hypothesized that IBD patients treated with biologic agents have a lower risk of developing cardiac arrhythmias compared to IBD patients who have not received biologics. Goals/Aims: To compare the incidence and burden of atrial fibrillation (AF), supraventricular tachycardias (SVT), bradyarrhythmias, and other arrhythmias in IBD patients with vs. without biologic therapy, using a propensity score–matched analysis. Methods/Approach: Using the TriNetX Research USA network, we identified two cohorts of IBD patients: those exposed to biologic therapy (n=101,711) and those who have not received biologics (n=486,879). IBD was defined using ICD-10 codes for Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed based on demographics and clinical variables to balance baseline characteristics. Patients with arrhythmias prior to the index event were excluded. Outcomes included AF (I48), SVT (I47–I49), bradyarrhythmias (I44–R00), and other arrhythmias (I45–I49), assessed using risk difference, odds ratios (OR), Kaplan-Meier survival, and event frequency analyses. Results/Data: Post-matching, the biologics and non-biologics cohorts were well balanced (n=98,543 each for AF analysis). The biologics cohort had a significantly lower risk of AF (2.7% vs. 4.3%; OR 0.619, 95% CI: 0.594–0.645, p<0.001), SVT (2.2% vs. 3.0%; OR 0.742, 95% CI: 0.710–0.777), bradyarrhythmias (3.7% vs. 5.1%; OR 0.703), and other arrhythmias (5.3% vs. 6.8%; OR 0.766). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed higher arrhythmia-free survival in the biologics cohort across all arrhythmia subtypes (p<0.001). The number of arrhythmia events was also lower in the biologics group for AF (mean 10.9 vs. 12.2, p=0.016) and bradyarrhythmias (2.6 vs. 2.8, p=0.025). Conclusion(s): In a large propensity-matched real-world cohort of IBD patients, biologic therapy was associated with a significantly reduced risk and burden of cardiac arrhythmias. These findings suggest a possible cardioprotective role for biologics in chronic inflammatory diseases and warrant prospective validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4363309
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4363309: Association of Biologic Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Risk of Cardiac Arrhythmias: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Nirmal Kaur, Birsukhman Singh, Birgurman Singh, Anmol Singh et al.
Circulation
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Abstract 4363309: Association of Biologic Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Risk of Cardiac Arrhythmias: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Nirmal Kaur, Birsukhman Singh, Birgurman Singh, Anmol Singh, Umesh Bhagat, Archit Garg
article en

Abstract

Introduction/Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk for cardiac arrhythmias due to chronic systemic inflammation. The potential protective effects of biologic therapy against arrhythmias have not been well established in large population data. Research Question/Hypothesis: We hypothesized that IBD patients treated with biologic agents have a lower risk of developing cardiac arrhythmias compared to IBD patients who have not received biologics. Goals/Aims: To compare the incidence and burden of atrial fibrillation (AF), supraventricular tachycardias (SVT), bradyarrhythmias, and other arrhythmias in IBD patients with vs. without biologic therapy, using a propensity score–matched analysis. Methods/Approach: Using the TriNetX Research USA network, we identified two cohorts of IBD patients: those exposed to biologic therapy (n=101,711) and those who have not received biologics (n=486,879). IBD was defined using ICD-10 codes for Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed based on demographics and clinical variables to balance baseline characteristics. Patients with arrhythmias prior to the index event were excluded. Outcomes included AF (I48), SVT (I47–I49), bradyarrhythmias (I44–R00), and other arrhythmias (I45–I49), assessed using risk difference, odds ratios (OR), Kaplan-Meier survival, and event frequency analyses. Results/Data: Post-matching, the biologics and non-biologics cohorts were well balanced (n=98,543 each for AF analysis). The biologics cohort had a significantly lower risk of AF (2.7% vs. 4.3%; OR 0.619, 95% CI: 0.594–0.645, p<0.001), SVT (2.2% vs. 3.0%; OR 0.742, 95% CI: 0.710–0.777), bradyarrhythmias (3.7% vs. 5.1%; OR 0.703), and other arrhythmias (5.3% vs. 6.8%; OR 0.766). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed higher arrhythmia-free survival in the biologics cohort across all arrhythmia subtypes (p<0.001). The number of arrhythmia events was also lower in the biologics group for AF (mean 10.9 vs. 12.2, p=0.016) and bradyarrhythmias (2.6 vs. 2.8, p=0.025). Conclusion(s): In a large propensity-matched real-world cohort of IBD patients, biologic therapy was associated with a significantly reduced risk and burden of cardiac arrhythmias. These findings suggest a possible cardioprotective role for biologics in chronic inflammatory diseases and warrant prospective validation.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Saint Peter's University Hospital (US), University of Hartford (US), Indira Gandhi Medical College (IN), Connecticut Science Center (US), Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.