Abstract 4368127: Multi-Center Validation of an AI-Enhanced ECG Model for Predicting Echocardiographic Abnormalities: A Large-Scale Study Across 14 Tertiary Care Centers

Background: While numerous AI models leverage ECGs to predict specific cardiac abnormalities, few have been validated at scale across diverse populations and echocardiographic pathologies. This study evaluates the external performance of a deep learning ensemble that predicts a composite of major echocardiographic abnormalities —including reduced ejection fraction (≤35%), valvular disease (mild to severe stenosis and/or moderate to severe regurgitation of Mitral, Aortic and/or Tricuspid valves), and elevated pulmonary artery pressure—from standard 12-lead ECG images. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 44,403 ECGs from 43,346 patients (≥15 years) across 14 centers between July and September 2024. The data was split into two cohorts: Co1 included 28,509 ECGs paired with same-day echocardiograms; Co2 included 15,894 ECGs (from 15,401 patients) without same-day echocardiograms. The ensemble model—comprising two InceptionNetV3 and one ResNet50 networks trained on DICOM ECG images—classified ECGs as positive or negative for any one of eight echocardiographic dysfunctions based on the Youden index threshold (0.27) calculated during model development. Results: On Co1, the model achieved an ROCAUC of 84% , PR-AUC of 45% , sensitivity 74% , specificity 79% , PPV 34% , NPV 96% , and overall accuracy of 80% . A robust performance was observed in all subsets (Fig. 1). In the subset of false positives (5,127 patients), 932 patients who had follow-up echocardiograms within a median of 54 days revealed that 28% eventually showed echocardiographic dysfunction. In Co2, out of the 15,401 patients, 2,185 patients underwent at least one echocardiogram within 6 months post-ECG. Among those, of the 830 patients who were previously flagged positive for dysfunction by the model, 49% were found to have dysfunction, with a median interval of 28 days between the initial ECG and echo. Conclusion: This AI-enhanced ECG model demonstrates strong generalizability and clinical utility for early identification of echocardiographic abnormalities, offering a scalable solution to triage echocardiography referrals across varied clinical settings, requiring about 2.9 echos to confirm 1 case flagged as dysfunction by the model. Prospective validation is underway to further evaluate its impact on diagnostic workflows and patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4368127
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4368127: Multi-Center Validation of an AI-Enhanced ECG Model for Predicting Echocardiographic Abnormalities: A Large-Scale Study Across 14 Tertiary Care Centers

Abhyuday Kumara Swamy, Pradeep Narayan, Santhosh Rathnam Palani, Vivek Rajagopal et al.
Circulation
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
article

Abstract 4368127: Multi-Center Validation of an AI-Enhanced ECG Model for Predicting Echocardiographic Abnormalities: A Large-Scale Study Across 14 Tertiary Care Centers

Abhyuday Kumara Swamy, Pradeep Narayan, Santhosh Rathnam Palani, Vivek Rajagopal, Deepak G. Krishnan, Deepak Padmanabhan, Pranay Umredkar, Aditya Suyal
article en

Abstract

Background: While numerous AI models leverage ECGs to predict specific cardiac abnormalities, few have been validated at scale across diverse populations and echocardiographic pathologies. This study evaluates the external performance of a deep learning ensemble that predicts a composite of major echocardiographic abnormalities —including reduced ejection fraction (≤35%), valvular disease (mild to severe stenosis and/or moderate to severe regurgitation of Mitral, Aortic and/or Tricuspid valves), and elevated pulmonary artery pressure—from standard 12-lead ECG images. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 44,403 ECGs from 43,346 patients (≥15 years) across 14 centers between July and September 2024. The data was split into two cohorts: Co1 included 28,509 ECGs paired with same-day echocardiograms; Co2 included 15,894 ECGs (from 15,401 patients) without same-day echocardiograms. The ensemble model—comprising two InceptionNetV3 and one ResNet50 networks trained on DICOM ECG images—classified ECGs as positive or negative for any one of eight echocardiographic dysfunctions based on the Youden index threshold (0.27) calculated during model development. Results: On Co1, the model achieved an ROCAUC of 84% , PR-AUC of 45% , sensitivity 74% , specificity 79% , PPV 34% , NPV 96% , and overall accuracy of 80% . A robust performance was observed in all subsets (Fig. 1). In the subset of false positives (5,127 patients), 932 patients who had follow-up echocardiograms within a median of 54 days revealed that 28% eventually showed echocardiographic dysfunction. In Co2, out of the 15,401 patients, 2,185 patients underwent at least one echocardiogram within 6 months post-ECG. Among those, of the 830 patients who were previously flagged positive for dysfunction by the model, 49% were found to have dysfunction, with a median interval of 28 days between the initial ECG and echo. Conclusion: This AI-enhanced ECG model demonstrates strong generalizability and clinical utility for early identification of echocardiographic abnormalities, offering a scalable solution to triage echocardiography referrals across varied clinical settings, requiring about 2.9 echos to confirm 1 case flagged as dysfunction by the model. Prospective validation is underway to further evaluate its impact on diagnostic workflows and patient outcomes.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Narayana Health (IN), Rabindranath Tagore International Institute of Cardiac Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.