Abstract 4367767: Implementation of Cardiac Monitoring in ARDS: A Systematic Review and Implementation Framework

Background: ARDS affects 200,000 patients annually with 35-60% mortality. Cardiac dysfunction occurs in 60-78% of patients, yet systematic monitoring exists in <30% of ICUs despite point-of-care echo availability in 85% of facilities. This represents a critical quality gap with immediate improvement opportunity using existing technologies. Objective: Systematically evaluate cardiac monitoring evidence in ARDS and develop practical implementation framework for immediate deployment across diverse ICU settings using currently available technologies. Methods: Systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane through November 2024 for studies evaluating cardiac monitoring in ARDS using standard ICU equipment. Included RCTs and observational studies (≥20 patients) assessing cardiovascular effects of ventilation strategies. Evidence quality assessed using GRADE methodology. Surveyed technology availability and developed tiered protocols based on resource capabilities. Results: Seven studies (892 patients, low-moderate evidence quality) demonstrated cardiac dysfunction associated with increased mortality (OR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.6-3.2) but significant implementation gaps. Point-of-care echo available in 85% of ICUs, cardiac biomarkers in 98% of hospitals, yet protocols exist in <30%. Developed three-tier framework: Tier 1 (basic assessment, >95% ICUs, 6-12 months, <$50,000), Tier 2 (enhanced monitoring, 60-70% ICUs), Tier 3 (advanced centers). Barriers were organizational rather than technological. Conclusions: Despite limited evidence, immediate systematic cardiac monitoring implementation is feasible using existing technologies. Three-tier framework addresses resource limitations through scalable protocols. Pilot implementation in motivated centers could demonstrate feasibility while generating real-world evidence, transforming evidence limitations into quality improvement opportunities. Impact: Could improve recognition in 140,000 ARDS patients annually, potentially reducing mortality and ICU length of stay while establishing infrastructure for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367767
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367767: Implementation of Cardiac Monitoring in ARDS: A Systematic Review and Implementation Framework

Omesh Prathiraja, Younghwa Kwon, Anirudh Jain, Khalid Elhassan
Circulation
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Abstract 4367767: Implementation of Cardiac Monitoring in ARDS: A Systematic Review and Implementation Framework

Omesh Prathiraja, Younghwa Kwon, Anirudh Jain, Khalid Elhassan
article en

Abstract

Background: ARDS affects 200,000 patients annually with 35-60% mortality. Cardiac dysfunction occurs in 60-78% of patients, yet systematic monitoring exists in <30% of ICUs despite point-of-care echo availability in 85% of facilities. This represents a critical quality gap with immediate improvement opportunity using existing technologies. Objective: Systematically evaluate cardiac monitoring evidence in ARDS and develop practical implementation framework for immediate deployment across diverse ICU settings using currently available technologies. Methods: Systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane through November 2024 for studies evaluating cardiac monitoring in ARDS using standard ICU equipment. Included RCTs and observational studies (≥20 patients) assessing cardiovascular effects of ventilation strategies. Evidence quality assessed using GRADE methodology. Surveyed technology availability and developed tiered protocols based on resource capabilities. Results: Seven studies (892 patients, low-moderate evidence quality) demonstrated cardiac dysfunction associated with increased mortality (OR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.6-3.2) but significant implementation gaps. Point-of-care echo available in 85% of ICUs, cardiac biomarkers in 98% of hospitals, yet protocols exist in <30%. Developed three-tier framework: Tier 1 (basic assessment, >95% ICUs, 6-12 months, <$50,000), Tier 2 (enhanced monitoring, 60-70% ICUs), Tier 3 (advanced centers). Barriers were organizational rather than technological. Conclusions: Despite limited evidence, immediate systematic cardiac monitoring implementation is feasible using existing technologies. Three-tier framework addresses resource limitations through scalable protocols. Pilot implementation in motivated centers could demonstrate feasibility while generating real-world evidence, transforming evidence limitations into quality improvement opportunities. Impact: Could improve recognition in 140,000 ARDS patients annually, potentially reducing mortality and ICU length of stay while establishing infrastructure for future research.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Bay College (US), McLaren Northern Michigan (US), Great Lakes Research Group (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.