Abstract 4338384: Cardiovascular and Kidney Events Associated with Hypertension Screening Algorithms Among Young and Middle-Aged Adults

Introduction: Multiple screening algorithms exist for detecting undiagnosed hypertension, but hypertension-related outcomes across algorithms are unexplored, limiting universal implementation. Research Question: What is the association between different hypertension screening algorithms and increased risks of cardiovascular and kidney events among young and middle-aged adults without a prior hypertension diagnosis? Methods: We identified young (18-39 years) and middle-aged (40-64 years) individuals without prior hypertension diagnosis from Kaiser Permanente Southern California from 2009 to 2019. We applied three hypertension screening algorithms based on outpatient blood pressure (BP) measurements from separate visits that met high BP criteria (≥140/90 mm Hg) within 2 years: (1) the average of two BPs, (2) the average of three BPs, and (3) two consecutive BPs. If individuals had multiple BP measures during the same visit, the lowest BP recorded was used in the primary analysis; a sensitivity analysis used the average BP per visit. We used a composite outcome of cardiovascular and kidney events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and macroalbuminuria. Cox proportional hazard models identified associations between each hypertension screening algorithm and the composite outcome, adjusting for covariates in young and middle-aged adults. Results: Of the 300,892 young adults included, 1.9-5.3% met the screening algorithm criteria, compared to 4.3-13.1% of 271,045 middle-aged adults (Table). All algorithms were associated with an increased risk of the composite outcome, with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) ranging from 2.7 to 3.9 in young adults and 1.5 to 1.9 in middle-aged adults, though confidence intervals overlapped across algorithms. Among young adults, the algorithm using two consecutive high BPs and the lowest BP per visit was associated with the highest risk (aHR 3.9, 95% CI 3.2, 4.7), whereas among middle-aged adults, the average of three BPs using the lowest BP per visit was associated with the highest risk (aHR 1.9, 95% CI 1.8, 2.1). Conclusion: Despite identifying varying numbers of individuals with high BP, all screening algorithms were associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and kidney events with similar magnitudes of risk in young and middle-aged adults. These findings support using these algorithms for risk monitoring and timely diagnosis of hypertension to prevent future cardiovascular and kidney events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4338384
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4338384: Cardiovascular and Kidney Events Associated with Hypertension Screening Algorithms Among Young and Middle-Aged Adults

Yiyi Zhang, Kavenpreet Bal, Kristi Reynolds, Jeff Brettler et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4338384: Cardiovascular and Kidney Events Associated with Hypertension Screening Algorithms Among Young and Middle-Aged Adults

Yiyi Zhang, Kavenpreet Bal, Kristi Reynolds, Jeff Brettler, Kerresa Morrissette, Seulggie Choi, Katherine Pak, Stanley Xu, Heidi Fischer, Jaejin An, Liang Ni
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Multiple screening algorithms exist for detecting undiagnosed hypertension, but hypertension-related outcomes across algorithms are unexplored, limiting universal implementation. Research Question: What is the association between different hypertension screening algorithms and increased risks of cardiovascular and kidney events among young and middle-aged adults without a prior hypertension diagnosis? Methods: We identified young (18-39 years) and middle-aged (40-64 years) individuals without prior hypertension diagnosis from Kaiser Permanente Southern California from 2009 to 2019. We applied three hypertension screening algorithms based on outpatient blood pressure (BP) measurements from separate visits that met high BP criteria (≥140/90 mm Hg) within 2 years: (1) the average of two BPs, (2) the average of three BPs, and (3) two consecutive BPs. If individuals had multiple BP measures during the same visit, the lowest BP recorded was used in the primary analysis; a sensitivity analysis used the average BP per visit. We used a composite outcome of cardiovascular and kidney events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and macroalbuminuria. Cox proportional hazard models identified associations between each hypertension screening algorithm and the composite outcome, adjusting for covariates in young and middle-aged adults. Results: Of the 300,892 young adults included, 1.9-5.3% met the screening algorithm criteria, compared to 4.3-13.1% of 271,045 middle-aged adults (Table). All algorithms were associated with an increased risk of the composite outcome, with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) ranging from 2.7 to 3.9 in young adults and 1.5 to 1.9 in middle-aged adults, though confidence intervals overlapped across algorithms. Among young adults, the algorithm using two consecutive high BPs and the lowest BP per visit was associated with the highest risk (aHR 3.9, 95% CI 3.2, 4.7), whereas among middle-aged adults, the average of three BPs using the lowest BP per visit was associated with the highest risk (aHR 1.9, 95% CI 1.8, 2.1). Conclusion: Despite identifying varying numbers of individuals with high BP, all screening algorithms were associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and kidney events with similar magnitudes of risk in young and middle-aged adults. These findings support using these algorithms for risk monitoring and timely diagnosis of hypertension to prevent future cardiovascular and kidney events.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Kaiser Permanente (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.