Abstract 4366400: Malnutrition Attenuates the Protective Obesity Paradox in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Background: Obesity is associated with lower mortality in individuals with established ASCVD, a phenomenon known as the obesity paradox. Malnutrition is a robust and consistent predictor of poor outcomes in nearly all clinical settings and may often coexist with obesity. It is unknown if malnutrition modifies the survival advantage attributable to obesity in this population. Research Question: We determine whether obesity and malnutrition independently predict all-cause mortality in adults with ASCVD, and how their coexistence alters mortality risk. Methods: We analyzed adults with prevalent ASCVD from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey 2011-2018, with survey-weighted Cox regression analyses for nationally representative estimates. Obesity was defined using ethnic specific cut-offs of BMI, and malnutrition using the prognostic nutritional index (lowest quartile <48). We used interaction analyses to examine whether malnutrition attenuated the protective association of obesity with mortality, and whether the prognostic impact of malnutrition varied by obesity status. Results: The final weighted sample included 17.1 million adults with ASCVD, of whom 1.9 million (11.5%) were both obese and malnourished. In fully adjusted models, malnutrition and obesity were independent predictors of all-cause mortality (Figure). Malnutrition was associated with increased hazards 1.73 [1.26–2.37], while obesity was associated with lower hazards 0.69 [0.49-0.96]. The effects of obesity on mortality differed significantly by nutritional status in interaction analyses ( P -int = 0.004). Malnutrition was strongly associated with mortality among obese individuals 2.57 [1.53-4.33], but not among non-obese individuals 1.42 [0.93-2.16]. Conversely, the protective association of obesity was observed only among well-nourished individuals 0.61 [0.40–0.93], but was somewhat attenuated in malnourished 0.68 [0.38-1.24]. In a combined analysis, those who were both obese and malnourished did not demonstrate the protective association observed in the obese-only group. Conclusion: Obesity was associated with lower mortality in ASCVD, but this benefit was absent in the presence of malnutrition. Malnutrition conferred higher risk among obese individuals than among the non-obese. The obesity paradox may at least partially reflect preserved nutritional reserve. Clinical obesity assessment should incorporate objective measures of nutritional status to accurately characterize risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4366400
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4366400: Malnutrition Attenuates the Protective Obesity Paradox in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Lorenzo J. Olivero, Michael G. Nanna, Zafer Akman, Sridhar Mangalesh et al.
Circulation
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Abstract 4366400: Malnutrition Attenuates the Protective Obesity Paradox in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Lorenzo J. Olivero, Michael G. Nanna, Zafer Akman, Sridhar Mangalesh, Raiza Rossi, Kuan Yu
article en

Abstract

Background: Obesity is associated with lower mortality in individuals with established ASCVD, a phenomenon known as the obesity paradox. Malnutrition is a robust and consistent predictor of poor outcomes in nearly all clinical settings and may often coexist with obesity. It is unknown if malnutrition modifies the survival advantage attributable to obesity in this population. Research Question: We determine whether obesity and malnutrition independently predict all-cause mortality in adults with ASCVD, and how their coexistence alters mortality risk. Methods: We analyzed adults with prevalent ASCVD from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey 2011-2018, with survey-weighted Cox regression analyses for nationally representative estimates. Obesity was defined using ethnic specific cut-offs of BMI, and malnutrition using the prognostic nutritional index (lowest quartile <48). We used interaction analyses to examine whether malnutrition attenuated the protective association of obesity with mortality, and whether the prognostic impact of malnutrition varied by obesity status. Results: The final weighted sample included 17.1 million adults with ASCVD, of whom 1.9 million (11.5%) were both obese and malnourished. In fully adjusted models, malnutrition and obesity were independent predictors of all-cause mortality (Figure). Malnutrition was associated with increased hazards 1.73 [1.26–2.37], while obesity was associated with lower hazards 0.69 [0.49-0.96]. The effects of obesity on mortality differed significantly by nutritional status in interaction analyses ( P -int = 0.004). Malnutrition was strongly associated with mortality among obese individuals 2.57 [1.53-4.33], but not among non-obese individuals 1.42 [0.93-2.16]. Conversely, the protective association of obesity was observed only among well-nourished individuals 0.61 [0.40–0.93], but was somewhat attenuated in malnourished 0.68 [0.38-1.24]. In a combined analysis, those who were both obese and malnourished did not demonstrate the protective association observed in the obese-only group. Conclusion: Obesity was associated with lower mortality in ASCVD, but this benefit was absent in the presence of malnutrition. Malnutrition conferred higher risk among obese individuals than among the non-obese. The obesity paradox may at least partially reflect preserved nutritional reserve. Clinical obesity assessment should incorporate objective measures of nutritional status to accurately characterize risk.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Jacobi Medical Center (US), Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.