Abstract 4363341: Troponin Testing Trends in US Emergency Departments

Introduction: Little is known regarding recent temporal trends in troponin testing in US EDs. While insufficient testing risks overlooking MIs, excessive testing may contribute to diagnostic inaccuracies, extended hospitalizations, and unnecessary downstream investigations. Method: We conducted a pooled cross-sectional analysis of troponin testing trends in US EDs from 1/2019 to 12/2024 using EHRs from Epic Cosmos database which includes more than 290 million patients across the US. ED encounters and corresponding number of patients (≥18 years) were identified. Using reason for visit, tested patients were classified into 3 groups: chest pain (CP), non–chest pain anginal equivalent (NCPAE) (SOB, diaphoresis, nausea, dizziness), and no anginal symptoms. ED diagnosis (1st or 2nd), admitting diagnosis, and/or discharge diagnosis were used to identify ACS. Primary outcome was the proportion of ED visits with troponin testing and subsequent ACS diagnosis. Testing trends over time were analyzed. Results: 231,544,395 ED encounters accounting for 83,157,740 patients were identified. Among these, 27,514,437 patients (33.1%) underwent quantitative troponin testing. Patients undergoing troponin testing were older (60 ± 20 vs 44 ± 25 yrs), more likely to be female (54.4% vs 51.4%), and white (72.3% vs 67.8%). They had a higher prevalence of HTN (65.0% vs 40.0%), HLD (55.9% vs 34.6%), CKD (20.2% vs 5.0%), and smoking history (10.5% vs 5.3%). Of those tested, 32.8% presented with CP, 20.1% presented with NCPAE, and 47.1% had no anginal symptoms. Abnormal troponin levels were observed in 21.3% of patients (n = 5,860,575; 95% CI: 21.25%–21.35%). A diagnosis of ACS was made in 2.2% of patients who underwent troponin testing (n = 605,166; 95% CI: 2.19%–2.20%). The incidence of ACS was highest in those presenting with CP (3.6%), followed by those with NCPAE (1.12%), and was lowest in patients with nonanginal symptoms (0.84%). On trend analysis, troponin testing rates increased during the COVID-19 pandemic years, followed by a subsequent decline (P trend = 0.03; Fig 1A ). From 2019 to 2024, there was a steady decrease in the use of Trop I—and to a lesser extent, Trop T—in favor of hsTroponins ( Fig 1B ). Conclusions: Nearly one in three patients presenting to US EDs underwent troponin testing. Among those tested, around one in five patients had abnormal troponins, but only 2.2% were diagnosed with ACS. Refinements in cardiac biomarker testing strategies are needed to optimize ACS diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4363341
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4363341: Troponin Testing Trends in US Emergency Departments

Serge C. Harb, Joseph Kassab, Samir Kapadia
Circulation
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
article

Abstract 4363341: Troponin Testing Trends in US Emergency Departments

Serge C. Harb, Joseph Kassab, Samir Kapadia
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Little is known regarding recent temporal trends in troponin testing in US EDs. While insufficient testing risks overlooking MIs, excessive testing may contribute to diagnostic inaccuracies, extended hospitalizations, and unnecessary downstream investigations. Method: We conducted a pooled cross-sectional analysis of troponin testing trends in US EDs from 1/2019 to 12/2024 using EHRs from Epic Cosmos database which includes more than 290 million patients across the US. ED encounters and corresponding number of patients (≥18 years) were identified. Using reason for visit, tested patients were classified into 3 groups: chest pain (CP), non–chest pain anginal equivalent (NCPAE) (SOB, diaphoresis, nausea, dizziness), and no anginal symptoms. ED diagnosis (1st or 2nd), admitting diagnosis, and/or discharge diagnosis were used to identify ACS. Primary outcome was the proportion of ED visits with troponin testing and subsequent ACS diagnosis. Testing trends over time were analyzed. Results: 231,544,395 ED encounters accounting for 83,157,740 patients were identified. Among these, 27,514,437 patients (33.1%) underwent quantitative troponin testing. Patients undergoing troponin testing were older (60 ± 20 vs 44 ± 25 yrs), more likely to be female (54.4% vs 51.4%), and white (72.3% vs 67.8%). They had a higher prevalence of HTN (65.0% vs 40.0%), HLD (55.9% vs 34.6%), CKD (20.2% vs 5.0%), and smoking history (10.5% vs 5.3%). Of those tested, 32.8% presented with CP, 20.1% presented with NCPAE, and 47.1% had no anginal symptoms. Abnormal troponin levels were observed in 21.3% of patients (n = 5,860,575; 95% CI: 21.25%–21.35%). A diagnosis of ACS was made in 2.2% of patients who underwent troponin testing (n = 605,166; 95% CI: 2.19%–2.20%). The incidence of ACS was highest in those presenting with CP (3.6%), followed by those with NCPAE (1.12%), and was lowest in patients with nonanginal symptoms (0.84%). On trend analysis, troponin testing rates increased during the COVID-19 pandemic years, followed by a subsequent decline (P trend = 0.03; Fig 1A ). From 2019 to 2024, there was a steady decrease in the use of Trop I—and to a lesser extent, Trop T—in favor of hsTroponins ( Fig 1B ). Conclusions: Nearly one in three patients presenting to US EDs underwent troponin testing. Among those tested, around one in five patients had abnormal troponins, but only 2.2% were diagnosed with ACS. Refinements in cardiac biomarker testing strategies are needed to optimize ACS diagnosis.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Cleveland Clinic (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.