Abstract 4363382: Increased Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement for Cardiac Electrophysiology Procedures from 2013 to 2022

Introduction: Medicare is the largest health care payer in the U.S., and private-payer reimbursement is often influenced by Medicare rates. Thus, trends in Medicare reimbursement have implications for specialty practice patterns. However, literature on Medicare trends for cardiac electrophysiology (EP) procedures is limited. Medicare sets rates by assigning relative value units (RVUs) to services, each linked to a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code. RVUs are multiplied by a conversion factor to calculate reimbursement. Research Question: What are the inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement trends for EP procedures for 2013-2022? Methods: The Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners by Geography and Service Dataset was queried for EP CPT codes. Medicare Part B reimbursements were compiled and averaged for 2013-2022, limited to facility settings. All rates and conversion factors were adjusted for inflation to 2022 dollars using the Consumer Price Index. Aggregate reimbursement rates were weighted by each CPT code’s share of annual Medicare expenditures. Codes were categorized by procedure type as EP studies/ablations or implantable electronic devices. Results: Inflation-adjusted average reimbursement for all EP procedures increased 16.9% from 2013 to 2022. EP studies/ablations saw a 0.7% decrease, while implantable devices increased 31.7%. Over the same period, the Medicare RVU conversion factor declined by 16.6% (Figure 1). EP studies/ablations grew as a share of Medicare EP expenditures from 37.4% in 2013 to 47.6% in 2022, while implantable devices declined from 62.6% to 52.4%. Volumes for EP studies/ablations rose by 48.1%, while implantable devices declined by 27.8%. Among devices, pacemaker expenditure fell 14.6% with a 25.7% volume drop, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator expenditure fell 12.2% with a 40.5% volume drop. Among EP studies/ablations, ventricular tachycardia ablation expenditure rose 38.2% with a 59.7% volume increase, supraventricular tachycardia ablation expenditure fell 17.3% with a 4.5% volume drop, and atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation expenditure increased 169.5% and volume grew 210.0%. Conclusions: From 2013 to 2022, inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for EP procedures grew despite a declining RVU conversion factor. This trend was driven by increased implantable devices reimbursement and rising EP studies/ablation volume, particularly AF ablation, which may reflect expanding evidence favoring ablation for AF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4363382
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4363382: Increased Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement for Cardiac Electrophysiology Procedures from 2013 to 2022

Pranav Puri, Paari Dominic, Dennis Moe, Peter Farjo
Circulation
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Abstract 4363382: Increased Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement for Cardiac Electrophysiology Procedures from 2013 to 2022

Pranav Puri, Paari Dominic, Dennis Moe, Peter Farjo
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Medicare is the largest health care payer in the U.S., and private-payer reimbursement is often influenced by Medicare rates. Thus, trends in Medicare reimbursement have implications for specialty practice patterns. However, literature on Medicare trends for cardiac electrophysiology (EP) procedures is limited. Medicare sets rates by assigning relative value units (RVUs) to services, each linked to a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code. RVUs are multiplied by a conversion factor to calculate reimbursement. Research Question: What are the inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement trends for EP procedures for 2013-2022? Methods: The Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners by Geography and Service Dataset was queried for EP CPT codes. Medicare Part B reimbursements were compiled and averaged for 2013-2022, limited to facility settings. All rates and conversion factors were adjusted for inflation to 2022 dollars using the Consumer Price Index. Aggregate reimbursement rates were weighted by each CPT code’s share of annual Medicare expenditures. Codes were categorized by procedure type as EP studies/ablations or implantable electronic devices. Results: Inflation-adjusted average reimbursement for all EP procedures increased 16.9% from 2013 to 2022. EP studies/ablations saw a 0.7% decrease, while implantable devices increased 31.7%. Over the same period, the Medicare RVU conversion factor declined by 16.6% (Figure 1). EP studies/ablations grew as a share of Medicare EP expenditures from 37.4% in 2013 to 47.6% in 2022, while implantable devices declined from 62.6% to 52.4%. Volumes for EP studies/ablations rose by 48.1%, while implantable devices declined by 27.8%. Among devices, pacemaker expenditure fell 14.6% with a 25.7% volume drop, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator expenditure fell 12.2% with a 40.5% volume drop. Among EP studies/ablations, ventricular tachycardia ablation expenditure rose 38.2% with a 59.7% volume increase, supraventricular tachycardia ablation expenditure fell 17.3% with a 4.5% volume drop, and atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation expenditure increased 169.5% and volume grew 210.0%. Conclusions: From 2013 to 2022, inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for EP procedures grew despite a declining RVU conversion factor. This trend was driven by increased implantable devices reimbursement and rising EP studies/ablation volume, particularly AF ablation, which may reflect expanding evidence favoring ablation for AF.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Iowa (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.